Cargando…

COVID-19 preparedness and response in rural and remote areas: A scoping review

This scoping review used the Arksey and O’Malley approach to explore COVID-19 preparedness and response in rural and remote areas to identify lessons to inform future health preparedness and response planning. A search of scientific and grey literature for rural COVID-19 preparedness and responses i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dudley, Lilian, Couper, Ian, Kannangarage, Niluka Wijekoon, Naidoo, Selvan, Ribas, Clara Rodriguez, Koller, Theadora Swift, Young, Taryn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37967067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002602
_version_ 1785147593660039168
author Dudley, Lilian
Couper, Ian
Kannangarage, Niluka Wijekoon
Naidoo, Selvan
Ribas, Clara Rodriguez
Koller, Theadora Swift
Young, Taryn
author_facet Dudley, Lilian
Couper, Ian
Kannangarage, Niluka Wijekoon
Naidoo, Selvan
Ribas, Clara Rodriguez
Koller, Theadora Swift
Young, Taryn
author_sort Dudley, Lilian
collection PubMed
description This scoping review used the Arksey and O’Malley approach to explore COVID-19 preparedness and response in rural and remote areas to identify lessons to inform future health preparedness and response planning. A search of scientific and grey literature for rural COVID-19 preparedness and responses identified 5 668 articles published between 2019 and early 2022. A total of 293 articles were included, of which 160 (54.5%) were from high income countries and 106 (36.2%) from middle income countries. Studies focused mostly on the Maintenance of Essential Health Services (63; 21.5%), Surveillance, epidemiological investigation, contact tracing and adjustment of public health and social measures (60; 20.5%), Coordination and Planning (32; 10.9%); Case Management (30; 10.2%), Social Determinants of Health (29; 10%) and Risk Communication (22; 7.5%). Rural health systems were less prepared and national COVID-19 responses were often not adequately tailored to rural areas. Promising COVID-19 responses involved local leaders and communities, were collaborative and multisectoral, and engaged local cultures. Non-pharmaceutical interventions were applied less, support for access to water and sanitation at scale was weak, and more targeted approaches to the isolation of cases and quarantine of contacts were preferable to blanket lockdowns. Rural pharmacists, community health workers and agricultural extension workers assisted in overcoming shortages of health professionals. Vaccination coverage was hindered by weaker rural health systems. Digital technology enabled better coordination, communication, and access to health services, yet for some was inaccessible. Rural livelihoods and food security were affected through disruptions to local labour markets, farm produce markets and input supply chains. Important lessons include the need for rural proofing national health preparedness and response and optimizing synergies between top-down planning with localised planning and coordination. Equity-oriented rural health systems strengthening and action on rural social determinants is essential to better prepare for and respond to future outbreaks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10651055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106510552023-11-15 COVID-19 preparedness and response in rural and remote areas: A scoping review Dudley, Lilian Couper, Ian Kannangarage, Niluka Wijekoon Naidoo, Selvan Ribas, Clara Rodriguez Koller, Theadora Swift Young, Taryn PLOS Glob Public Health Research Article This scoping review used the Arksey and O’Malley approach to explore COVID-19 preparedness and response in rural and remote areas to identify lessons to inform future health preparedness and response planning. A search of scientific and grey literature for rural COVID-19 preparedness and responses identified 5 668 articles published between 2019 and early 2022. A total of 293 articles were included, of which 160 (54.5%) were from high income countries and 106 (36.2%) from middle income countries. Studies focused mostly on the Maintenance of Essential Health Services (63; 21.5%), Surveillance, epidemiological investigation, contact tracing and adjustment of public health and social measures (60; 20.5%), Coordination and Planning (32; 10.9%); Case Management (30; 10.2%), Social Determinants of Health (29; 10%) and Risk Communication (22; 7.5%). Rural health systems were less prepared and national COVID-19 responses were often not adequately tailored to rural areas. Promising COVID-19 responses involved local leaders and communities, were collaborative and multisectoral, and engaged local cultures. Non-pharmaceutical interventions were applied less, support for access to water and sanitation at scale was weak, and more targeted approaches to the isolation of cases and quarantine of contacts were preferable to blanket lockdowns. Rural pharmacists, community health workers and agricultural extension workers assisted in overcoming shortages of health professionals. Vaccination coverage was hindered by weaker rural health systems. Digital technology enabled better coordination, communication, and access to health services, yet for some was inaccessible. Rural livelihoods and food security were affected through disruptions to local labour markets, farm produce markets and input supply chains. Important lessons include the need for rural proofing national health preparedness and response and optimizing synergies between top-down planning with localised planning and coordination. Equity-oriented rural health systems strengthening and action on rural social determinants is essential to better prepare for and respond to future outbreaks. Public Library of Science 2023-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10651055/ /pubmed/37967067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002602 Text en © 2023 Dudley et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dudley, Lilian
Couper, Ian
Kannangarage, Niluka Wijekoon
Naidoo, Selvan
Ribas, Clara Rodriguez
Koller, Theadora Swift
Young, Taryn
COVID-19 preparedness and response in rural and remote areas: A scoping review
title COVID-19 preparedness and response in rural and remote areas: A scoping review
title_full COVID-19 preparedness and response in rural and remote areas: A scoping review
title_fullStr COVID-19 preparedness and response in rural and remote areas: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 preparedness and response in rural and remote areas: A scoping review
title_short COVID-19 preparedness and response in rural and remote areas: A scoping review
title_sort covid-19 preparedness and response in rural and remote areas: a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37967067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002602
work_keys_str_mv AT dudleylilian covid19preparednessandresponseinruralandremoteareasascopingreview
AT couperian covid19preparednessandresponseinruralandremoteareasascopingreview
AT kannangaragenilukawijekoon covid19preparednessandresponseinruralandremoteareasascopingreview
AT naidooselvan covid19preparednessandresponseinruralandremoteareasascopingreview
AT ribasclararodriguez covid19preparednessandresponseinruralandremoteareasascopingreview
AT kollertheadoraswift covid19preparednessandresponseinruralandremoteareasascopingreview
AT youngtaryn covid19preparednessandresponseinruralandremoteareasascopingreview