Cargando…

Determinants of the cuff-leak test: a physiological study

INTRODUCTION: The cuff-leak test has been proposed as a simple method to predict the occurrence of post-extubation stridor. The test is performed by cuff deflation and measuring the expired tidal volume a few breaths later (V(T)). The leak is calculated as the difference between V(T )with and withou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prinianakis, George, Alexopoulou, Christina, Mamidakis, Eutichis, Kondili, Eumorfia, Georgopoulos, Dimitris
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1065107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15693963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3012
_version_ 1782123351707222016
author Prinianakis, George
Alexopoulou, Christina
Mamidakis, Eutichis
Kondili, Eumorfia
Georgopoulos, Dimitris
author_facet Prinianakis, George
Alexopoulou, Christina
Mamidakis, Eutichis
Kondili, Eumorfia
Georgopoulos, Dimitris
author_sort Prinianakis, George
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The cuff-leak test has been proposed as a simple method to predict the occurrence of post-extubation stridor. The test is performed by cuff deflation and measuring the expired tidal volume a few breaths later (V(T)). The leak is calculated as the difference between V(T )with and without a deflated cuff. However, because the cuff remains deflated throughout the respiratory cycle a volume of gas may also leak during inspiration and therefore this method (conventional) measures the total leak consisting of an inspiratory and expiratory component. The aims of this physiological study were, first, to examine the effects of various variables on total leak and, second, to compare the total leak with that obtained when the inspiratory component was eliminated, leaving only the expiratory leak. METHODS: In 15 critically ill patients mechanically ventilated on volume control mode, the cuff-leak volume was measured randomly either by the conventional method (Leak(conv)) or by deflating the cuff at the end of inspiration and measuring the V(T )of the following expiration (Leak(pause)). To investigate the effects of respiratory system mechanics and inspiratory flow, cuff-leak volume was studied by using a lung model, varying the cross-sectional area around the endotracheal tube and model mechanics. RESULTS: In patients Leak(conv )was significantly higher than Leak(pause), averaging 188 ± 159 ml (mean ± SD) and 61 ± 75 ml, respectively. In the model study Leak(conv )increased significantly with decreasing inspiratory flow and model compliance. Leak(pause )and Leak(conv )increased slightly with increasing model resistance, the difference being significant only for Leak(pause). The difference between Leak(conv )and Leak(pause )increased significantly with decreasing inspiratory flow (V'(I)) and model compliance and increasing cross-sectional area around the tube. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the cross-sectional area around the endotracheal tube is not the only determinant of the cuff-leak test. System compliance and inspiratory flow significantly affect the test, mainly through an effect on the inspiratory component of the total leak. The expiratory component is slightly influenced by respiratory system resistance.
format Text
id pubmed-1065107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-10651072005-03-16 Determinants of the cuff-leak test: a physiological study Prinianakis, George Alexopoulou, Christina Mamidakis, Eutichis Kondili, Eumorfia Georgopoulos, Dimitris Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The cuff-leak test has been proposed as a simple method to predict the occurrence of post-extubation stridor. The test is performed by cuff deflation and measuring the expired tidal volume a few breaths later (V(T)). The leak is calculated as the difference between V(T )with and without a deflated cuff. However, because the cuff remains deflated throughout the respiratory cycle a volume of gas may also leak during inspiration and therefore this method (conventional) measures the total leak consisting of an inspiratory and expiratory component. The aims of this physiological study were, first, to examine the effects of various variables on total leak and, second, to compare the total leak with that obtained when the inspiratory component was eliminated, leaving only the expiratory leak. METHODS: In 15 critically ill patients mechanically ventilated on volume control mode, the cuff-leak volume was measured randomly either by the conventional method (Leak(conv)) or by deflating the cuff at the end of inspiration and measuring the V(T )of the following expiration (Leak(pause)). To investigate the effects of respiratory system mechanics and inspiratory flow, cuff-leak volume was studied by using a lung model, varying the cross-sectional area around the endotracheal tube and model mechanics. RESULTS: In patients Leak(conv )was significantly higher than Leak(pause), averaging 188 ± 159 ml (mean ± SD) and 61 ± 75 ml, respectively. In the model study Leak(conv )increased significantly with decreasing inspiratory flow and model compliance. Leak(pause )and Leak(conv )increased slightly with increasing model resistance, the difference being significant only for Leak(pause). The difference between Leak(conv )and Leak(pause )increased significantly with decreasing inspiratory flow (V'(I)) and model compliance and increasing cross-sectional area around the tube. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the cross-sectional area around the endotracheal tube is not the only determinant of the cuff-leak test. System compliance and inspiratory flow significantly affect the test, mainly through an effect on the inspiratory component of the total leak. The expiratory component is slightly influenced by respiratory system resistance. BioMed Central 2005 2004-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC1065107/ /pubmed/15693963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3012 Text en Copyright © 2004 Prinianakis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research
Prinianakis, George
Alexopoulou, Christina
Mamidakis, Eutichis
Kondili, Eumorfia
Georgopoulos, Dimitris
Determinants of the cuff-leak test: a physiological study
title Determinants of the cuff-leak test: a physiological study
title_full Determinants of the cuff-leak test: a physiological study
title_fullStr Determinants of the cuff-leak test: a physiological study
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of the cuff-leak test: a physiological study
title_short Determinants of the cuff-leak test: a physiological study
title_sort determinants of the cuff-leak test: a physiological study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1065107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15693963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3012
work_keys_str_mv AT prinianakisgeorge determinantsofthecuffleaktestaphysiologicalstudy
AT alexopoulouchristina determinantsofthecuffleaktestaphysiologicalstudy
AT mamidakiseutichis determinantsofthecuffleaktestaphysiologicalstudy
AT kondilieumorfia determinantsofthecuffleaktestaphysiologicalstudy
AT georgopoulosdimitris determinantsofthecuffleaktestaphysiologicalstudy