Cargando…

Survival benefit of living-donor liver transplantation in patients with a model for end-stage liver disease over 30 in a region with severe organ shortage: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The benefits of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients with a high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (who have high waitlist mortality) are unclear. Regional availability of deceased-donor organs must be considered when evaluating LDLT benefits. The authors ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yim, Seung Hyuk, Kim, Deok Gie, Kang, Minyu, Koh, Hwa Hee, Choi, Mun Chae, Min, Eun Ki, Lee, Jae Geun, Kim, Myoung Soo, Joo, Dong Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37565633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000634
_version_ 1785147620090445824
author Yim, Seung Hyuk
Kim, Deok Gie
Kang, Minyu
Koh, Hwa Hee
Choi, Mun Chae
Min, Eun Ki
Lee, Jae Geun
Kim, Myoung Soo
Joo, Dong Jin
author_facet Yim, Seung Hyuk
Kim, Deok Gie
Kang, Minyu
Koh, Hwa Hee
Choi, Mun Chae
Min, Eun Ki
Lee, Jae Geun
Kim, Myoung Soo
Joo, Dong Jin
author_sort Yim, Seung Hyuk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The benefits of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients with a high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (who have high waitlist mortality) are unclear. Regional availability of deceased-donor organs must be considered when evaluating LDLT benefits. The authors aimed to compare the survival benefit of intended-LDLT to awaiting deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 in a region with severe organ shortage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included 649 patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 placed on the liver transplantation waitlist. They were divided into intended-LDLT (n=205) or waiting-DDLT (n=444) groups based on living-donor eligibility and compared for patient survival from the time of waitlisting. Post-transplantation outcomes of transplant recipients and living donors were analyzed. RESULTS: Intended-LDLT patients had higher 1-year survival than waiting-DDLT patients (53.7 vs. 28.8%, P<0.001). LDLT was independently associated with lower mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48–0.79; P<0.001]. During follow-up, 25 patients were de-listed, 120 underwent LDLT, 170 underwent DDLT, and 334 remained on the waitlist. Among patients undergoing transplantation, the risk of post-transplantation mortality was similar for LDLT and DDLT after adjusting for pretransplantation MELD score (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 0.73–4.75; P=0.193), despite increased surgical complications after LDLT (33.1 vs. 19.4%, P=0.013). There was no mortality among living-donors, but 4.2% experienced complications of grade 3 or higher. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to awaiting DDLT, LDLT offers survival benefits for patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30, while maintaining acceptable donor outcomes. LDLT is a feasible treatment for patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 in regions with severe organ shortages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10651284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106512842023-11-15 Survival benefit of living-donor liver transplantation in patients with a model for end-stage liver disease over 30 in a region with severe organ shortage: a retrospective cohort study Yim, Seung Hyuk Kim, Deok Gie Kang, Minyu Koh, Hwa Hee Choi, Mun Chae Min, Eun Ki Lee, Jae Geun Kim, Myoung Soo Joo, Dong Jin Int J Surg Original Research BACKGROUND: The benefits of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients with a high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (who have high waitlist mortality) are unclear. Regional availability of deceased-donor organs must be considered when evaluating LDLT benefits. The authors aimed to compare the survival benefit of intended-LDLT to awaiting deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 in a region with severe organ shortage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included 649 patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 placed on the liver transplantation waitlist. They were divided into intended-LDLT (n=205) or waiting-DDLT (n=444) groups based on living-donor eligibility and compared for patient survival from the time of waitlisting. Post-transplantation outcomes of transplant recipients and living donors were analyzed. RESULTS: Intended-LDLT patients had higher 1-year survival than waiting-DDLT patients (53.7 vs. 28.8%, P<0.001). LDLT was independently associated with lower mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48–0.79; P<0.001]. During follow-up, 25 patients were de-listed, 120 underwent LDLT, 170 underwent DDLT, and 334 remained on the waitlist. Among patients undergoing transplantation, the risk of post-transplantation mortality was similar for LDLT and DDLT after adjusting for pretransplantation MELD score (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 0.73–4.75; P=0.193), despite increased surgical complications after LDLT (33.1 vs. 19.4%, P=0.013). There was no mortality among living-donors, but 4.2% experienced complications of grade 3 or higher. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to awaiting DDLT, LDLT offers survival benefits for patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30, while maintaining acceptable donor outcomes. LDLT is a feasible treatment for patients with a MELD score greater than or equal to 30 in regions with severe organ shortages. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10651284/ /pubmed/37565633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000634 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/) , which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Research
Yim, Seung Hyuk
Kim, Deok Gie
Kang, Minyu
Koh, Hwa Hee
Choi, Mun Chae
Min, Eun Ki
Lee, Jae Geun
Kim, Myoung Soo
Joo, Dong Jin
Survival benefit of living-donor liver transplantation in patients with a model for end-stage liver disease over 30 in a region with severe organ shortage: a retrospective cohort study
title Survival benefit of living-donor liver transplantation in patients with a model for end-stage liver disease over 30 in a region with severe organ shortage: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Survival benefit of living-donor liver transplantation in patients with a model for end-stage liver disease over 30 in a region with severe organ shortage: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Survival benefit of living-donor liver transplantation in patients with a model for end-stage liver disease over 30 in a region with severe organ shortage: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Survival benefit of living-donor liver transplantation in patients with a model for end-stage liver disease over 30 in a region with severe organ shortage: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Survival benefit of living-donor liver transplantation in patients with a model for end-stage liver disease over 30 in a region with severe organ shortage: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort survival benefit of living-donor liver transplantation in patients with a model for end-stage liver disease over 30 in a region with severe organ shortage: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37565633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000634
work_keys_str_mv AT yimseunghyuk survivalbenefitoflivingdonorlivertransplantationinpatientswithamodelforendstageliverdiseaseover30inaregionwithsevereorganshortagearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT kimdeokgie survivalbenefitoflivingdonorlivertransplantationinpatientswithamodelforendstageliverdiseaseover30inaregionwithsevereorganshortagearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT kangminyu survivalbenefitoflivingdonorlivertransplantationinpatientswithamodelforendstageliverdiseaseover30inaregionwithsevereorganshortagearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT kohhwahee survivalbenefitoflivingdonorlivertransplantationinpatientswithamodelforendstageliverdiseaseover30inaregionwithsevereorganshortagearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT choimunchae survivalbenefitoflivingdonorlivertransplantationinpatientswithamodelforendstageliverdiseaseover30inaregionwithsevereorganshortagearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT mineunki survivalbenefitoflivingdonorlivertransplantationinpatientswithamodelforendstageliverdiseaseover30inaregionwithsevereorganshortagearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT leejaegeun survivalbenefitoflivingdonorlivertransplantationinpatientswithamodelforendstageliverdiseaseover30inaregionwithsevereorganshortagearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT kimmyoungsoo survivalbenefitoflivingdonorlivertransplantationinpatientswithamodelforendstageliverdiseaseover30inaregionwithsevereorganshortagearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT joodongjin survivalbenefitoflivingdonorlivertransplantationinpatientswithamodelforendstageliverdiseaseover30inaregionwithsevereorganshortagearetrospectivecohortstudy