Cargando…
Development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: The value of existing prognostic models for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is limited. The inclusion of prognostic gene mutations would enhance the predictive efficacy. METHODS: In the screening cohorts, univariable Cox regression analysis was applied to investigate the effect of indivi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37578492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000636 |
_version_ | 1785147621301551104 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Xiang-Yu Zhu, Wen-Wei Lu, Lu Li, Yi-Tong Zhu, Ying Yang, Lu-Yu Sun, Hao-Ting Wang, Chao-Qun Lin, Jing Huang, Chong Yang, Xin Fan, Jie Jia, Hu-Liang Zhang, Ju-Bo Yin, Bao-Bing Chen, Jin-Hong Qin, Lun-Xiu |
author_facet | Wang, Xiang-Yu Zhu, Wen-Wei Lu, Lu Li, Yi-Tong Zhu, Ying Yang, Lu-Yu Sun, Hao-Ting Wang, Chao-Qun Lin, Jing Huang, Chong Yang, Xin Fan, Jie Jia, Hu-Liang Zhang, Ju-Bo Yin, Bao-Bing Chen, Jin-Hong Qin, Lun-Xiu |
author_sort | Wang, Xiang-Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The value of existing prognostic models for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is limited. The inclusion of prognostic gene mutations would enhance the predictive efficacy. METHODS: In the screening cohorts, univariable Cox regression analysis was applied to investigate the effect of individual mutant genes on overall survival (OS). In the training set, multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the independent prognostic roles of the clinicopathological and mutational parameters, and a prognostic model was constructed. Internal and external validations were conducted to evaluate the performance of this model. RESULTS: Among the recurrent mutations, only TP53 and KRAS ( G12 ) were significantly associated with OS across all three screening cohorts. In the training cohort, TP53 and KRAS ( G12 ) mutations in combination with seven other clinical parameters (tumor size, tumor number, vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, adjacent invasion, CA19-9, and CEA), were independent prognostic factors for OS. A mutation-annotated prognostic score (MAPS) was established based on the nine prognosticators. The C-indices of MAPS (0.782 and 0.731 in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively) were statistically higher than those of other existing models (P<0.05). Furthermore, the MAPS model also demonstrated significant value in predicting the possible benefits of upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The MAPS model demonstrated good performance in predicting the OS of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients. It may also help predict the possible benefits of upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10651289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106512892023-11-15 Development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study Wang, Xiang-Yu Zhu, Wen-Wei Lu, Lu Li, Yi-Tong Zhu, Ying Yang, Lu-Yu Sun, Hao-Ting Wang, Chao-Qun Lin, Jing Huang, Chong Yang, Xin Fan, Jie Jia, Hu-Liang Zhang, Ju-Bo Yin, Bao-Bing Chen, Jin-Hong Qin, Lun-Xiu Int J Surg Original Research BACKGROUND: The value of existing prognostic models for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is limited. The inclusion of prognostic gene mutations would enhance the predictive efficacy. METHODS: In the screening cohorts, univariable Cox regression analysis was applied to investigate the effect of individual mutant genes on overall survival (OS). In the training set, multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the independent prognostic roles of the clinicopathological and mutational parameters, and a prognostic model was constructed. Internal and external validations were conducted to evaluate the performance of this model. RESULTS: Among the recurrent mutations, only TP53 and KRAS ( G12 ) were significantly associated with OS across all three screening cohorts. In the training cohort, TP53 and KRAS ( G12 ) mutations in combination with seven other clinical parameters (tumor size, tumor number, vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, adjacent invasion, CA19-9, and CEA), were independent prognostic factors for OS. A mutation-annotated prognostic score (MAPS) was established based on the nine prognosticators. The C-indices of MAPS (0.782 and 0.731 in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively) were statistically higher than those of other existing models (P<0.05). Furthermore, the MAPS model also demonstrated significant value in predicting the possible benefits of upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The MAPS model demonstrated good performance in predicting the OS of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients. It may also help predict the possible benefits of upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10651289/ /pubmed/37578492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000636 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Research Wang, Xiang-Yu Zhu, Wen-Wei Lu, Lu Li, Yi-Tong Zhu, Ying Yang, Lu-Yu Sun, Hao-Ting Wang, Chao-Qun Lin, Jing Huang, Chong Yang, Xin Fan, Jie Jia, Hu-Liang Zhang, Ju-Bo Yin, Bao-Bing Chen, Jin-Hong Qin, Lun-Xiu Development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study |
title | Development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37578492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000636 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangxiangyu developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhuwenwei developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT lulu developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT liyitong developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhuying developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT yangluyu developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT sunhaoting developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT wangchaoqun developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT linjing developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT huangchong developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT yangxin developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT fanjie developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT jiahuliang developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhangjubo developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT yinbaobing developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT chenjinhong developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT qinlunxiu developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy |