Cargando…

Development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The value of existing prognostic models for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is limited. The inclusion of prognostic gene mutations would enhance the predictive efficacy. METHODS: In the screening cohorts, univariable Cox regression analysis was applied to investigate the effect of indivi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xiang-Yu, Zhu, Wen-Wei, Lu, Lu, Li, Yi-Tong, Zhu, Ying, Yang, Lu-Yu, Sun, Hao-Ting, Wang, Chao-Qun, Lin, Jing, Huang, Chong, Yang, Xin, Fan, Jie, Jia, Hu-Liang, Zhang, Ju-Bo, Yin, Bao-Bing, Chen, Jin-Hong, Qin, Lun-Xiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37578492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000636
_version_ 1785147621301551104
author Wang, Xiang-Yu
Zhu, Wen-Wei
Lu, Lu
Li, Yi-Tong
Zhu, Ying
Yang, Lu-Yu
Sun, Hao-Ting
Wang, Chao-Qun
Lin, Jing
Huang, Chong
Yang, Xin
Fan, Jie
Jia, Hu-Liang
Zhang, Ju-Bo
Yin, Bao-Bing
Chen, Jin-Hong
Qin, Lun-Xiu
author_facet Wang, Xiang-Yu
Zhu, Wen-Wei
Lu, Lu
Li, Yi-Tong
Zhu, Ying
Yang, Lu-Yu
Sun, Hao-Ting
Wang, Chao-Qun
Lin, Jing
Huang, Chong
Yang, Xin
Fan, Jie
Jia, Hu-Liang
Zhang, Ju-Bo
Yin, Bao-Bing
Chen, Jin-Hong
Qin, Lun-Xiu
author_sort Wang, Xiang-Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The value of existing prognostic models for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is limited. The inclusion of prognostic gene mutations would enhance the predictive efficacy. METHODS: In the screening cohorts, univariable Cox regression analysis was applied to investigate the effect of individual mutant genes on overall survival (OS). In the training set, multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the independent prognostic roles of the clinicopathological and mutational parameters, and a prognostic model was constructed. Internal and external validations were conducted to evaluate the performance of this model. RESULTS: Among the recurrent mutations, only TP53 and KRAS ( G12 ) were significantly associated with OS across all three screening cohorts. In the training cohort, TP53 and KRAS ( G12 ) mutations in combination with seven other clinical parameters (tumor size, tumor number, vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, adjacent invasion, CA19-9, and CEA), were independent prognostic factors for OS. A mutation-annotated prognostic score (MAPS) was established based on the nine prognosticators. The C-indices of MAPS (0.782 and 0.731 in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively) were statistically higher than those of other existing models (P<0.05). Furthermore, the MAPS model also demonstrated significant value in predicting the possible benefits of upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The MAPS model demonstrated good performance in predicting the OS of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients. It may also help predict the possible benefits of upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10651289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106512892023-11-15 Development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study Wang, Xiang-Yu Zhu, Wen-Wei Lu, Lu Li, Yi-Tong Zhu, Ying Yang, Lu-Yu Sun, Hao-Ting Wang, Chao-Qun Lin, Jing Huang, Chong Yang, Xin Fan, Jie Jia, Hu-Liang Zhang, Ju-Bo Yin, Bao-Bing Chen, Jin-Hong Qin, Lun-Xiu Int J Surg Original Research BACKGROUND: The value of existing prognostic models for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is limited. The inclusion of prognostic gene mutations would enhance the predictive efficacy. METHODS: In the screening cohorts, univariable Cox regression analysis was applied to investigate the effect of individual mutant genes on overall survival (OS). In the training set, multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the independent prognostic roles of the clinicopathological and mutational parameters, and a prognostic model was constructed. Internal and external validations were conducted to evaluate the performance of this model. RESULTS: Among the recurrent mutations, only TP53 and KRAS ( G12 ) were significantly associated with OS across all three screening cohorts. In the training cohort, TP53 and KRAS ( G12 ) mutations in combination with seven other clinical parameters (tumor size, tumor number, vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, adjacent invasion, CA19-9, and CEA), were independent prognostic factors for OS. A mutation-annotated prognostic score (MAPS) was established based on the nine prognosticators. The C-indices of MAPS (0.782 and 0.731 in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively) were statistically higher than those of other existing models (P<0.05). Furthermore, the MAPS model also demonstrated significant value in predicting the possible benefits of upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The MAPS model demonstrated good performance in predicting the OS of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients. It may also help predict the possible benefits of upfront surgery and adjuvant therapy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10651289/ /pubmed/37578492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000636 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Research
Wang, Xiang-Yu
Zhu, Wen-Wei
Lu, Lu
Li, Yi-Tong
Zhu, Ying
Yang, Lu-Yu
Sun, Hao-Ting
Wang, Chao-Qun
Lin, Jing
Huang, Chong
Yang, Xin
Fan, Jie
Jia, Hu-Liang
Zhang, Ju-Bo
Yin, Bao-Bing
Chen, Jin-Hong
Qin, Lun-Xiu
Development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study
title Development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort development and validation of a mutation-annotated prognostic score for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37578492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000636
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxiangyu developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhuwenwei developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lulu developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liyitong developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhuying developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yangluyu developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT sunhaoting developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wangchaoqun developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT linjing developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT huangchong developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yangxin developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT fanjie developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jiahuliang developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangjubo developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yinbaobing developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chenjinhong developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT qinlunxiu developmentandvalidationofamutationannotatedprognosticscoreforintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomaafterresectionaretrospectivecohortstudy