Cargando…
Techniques of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal fluid assessment in gastric cancer: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Staging laparoscopy for gastric cancer is recommended to assess the tumor’s locoregional extension and exclude peritoneal disease. As there is no consensus on optimizing the procedure’s diagnostic accuracy, we aimed to systematically review the literature on operative techniques, followe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37581636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000632 |
_version_ | 1785147622707691520 |
---|---|
author | Rawicz-Pruszyński, Karol Erodotou, Maria Pelc, Zuzanna Sędłak, Katarzyna Polkowski, Wojciech Pawlik, Timothy M. Wijnhoven, Bas P.L. |
author_facet | Rawicz-Pruszyński, Karol Erodotou, Maria Pelc, Zuzanna Sędłak, Katarzyna Polkowski, Wojciech Pawlik, Timothy M. Wijnhoven, Bas P.L. |
author_sort | Rawicz-Pruszyński, Karol |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Staging laparoscopy for gastric cancer is recommended to assess the tumor’s locoregional extension and exclude peritoneal disease. As there is no consensus on optimizing the procedure’s diagnostic accuracy, we aimed to systematically review the literature on operative techniques, followed by peritoneal lavage fluid assessment in gastric cancer patients. Specifically, we sought to indicate the most common characteristics of the procedure and cytological evaluation. METHODS: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The protocol for this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO database (CRD: 42022306746). On September 2022, a search was carried out using Embase, Medline ALL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection. RESULTS: The search identified 1632 studies on staging laparoscopy and 2190 studies on peritoneal fluid assessment. Some 212 studies were included. Open Hasson was the method of choice in accessing the peritoneal cavity in 65% of the studies, followed by establishing a pneumoperitoneum at 10–12 mmHg in 52% of reports. Most frequently, the patient was positioned supine (70%), while a 30° scope and three ports were used to assess the peritoneal cavity clockwise (72%, 77%, and 85%, respectively). Right and left upper abdomen quadrants were the predominant area of laparoscopic exploration (both 65%), followed by the primary tumor region (54%), liver and pelvis (both 30%), and small bowel and spleen (19% and 17%, respectively). Regions of peritoneal lavage and aspiration were limited to the pelvis (50%), followed by right and left upper abdomen quadrants (37.5% and 50%, respectively). No studies compared different methods of operative techniques or analysis of ascites/fluid. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates a high heterogeneity in the technique of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal fluid assessment in gastric cancer patients. Further research and initiatives to reach a consensus on the standardization of the procedure are warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10651295 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106512952023-11-15 Techniques of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal fluid assessment in gastric cancer: a systematic review Rawicz-Pruszyński, Karol Erodotou, Maria Pelc, Zuzanna Sędłak, Katarzyna Polkowski, Wojciech Pawlik, Timothy M. Wijnhoven, Bas P.L. Int J Surg Reviews BACKGROUND: Staging laparoscopy for gastric cancer is recommended to assess the tumor’s locoregional extension and exclude peritoneal disease. As there is no consensus on optimizing the procedure’s diagnostic accuracy, we aimed to systematically review the literature on operative techniques, followed by peritoneal lavage fluid assessment in gastric cancer patients. Specifically, we sought to indicate the most common characteristics of the procedure and cytological evaluation. METHODS: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The protocol for this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO database (CRD: 42022306746). On September 2022, a search was carried out using Embase, Medline ALL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection. RESULTS: The search identified 1632 studies on staging laparoscopy and 2190 studies on peritoneal fluid assessment. Some 212 studies were included. Open Hasson was the method of choice in accessing the peritoneal cavity in 65% of the studies, followed by establishing a pneumoperitoneum at 10–12 mmHg in 52% of reports. Most frequently, the patient was positioned supine (70%), while a 30° scope and three ports were used to assess the peritoneal cavity clockwise (72%, 77%, and 85%, respectively). Right and left upper abdomen quadrants were the predominant area of laparoscopic exploration (both 65%), followed by the primary tumor region (54%), liver and pelvis (both 30%), and small bowel and spleen (19% and 17%, respectively). Regions of peritoneal lavage and aspiration were limited to the pelvis (50%), followed by right and left upper abdomen quadrants (37.5% and 50%, respectively). No studies compared different methods of operative techniques or analysis of ascites/fluid. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates a high heterogeneity in the technique of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal fluid assessment in gastric cancer patients. Further research and initiatives to reach a consensus on the standardization of the procedure are warranted. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10651295/ /pubmed/37581636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000632 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/) , which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even for commercial purposes, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Reviews Rawicz-Pruszyński, Karol Erodotou, Maria Pelc, Zuzanna Sędłak, Katarzyna Polkowski, Wojciech Pawlik, Timothy M. Wijnhoven, Bas P.L. Techniques of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal fluid assessment in gastric cancer: a systematic review |
title | Techniques of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal fluid assessment in gastric cancer: a systematic review |
title_full | Techniques of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal fluid assessment in gastric cancer: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Techniques of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal fluid assessment in gastric cancer: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Techniques of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal fluid assessment in gastric cancer: a systematic review |
title_short | Techniques of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal fluid assessment in gastric cancer: a systematic review |
title_sort | techniques of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal fluid assessment in gastric cancer: a systematic review |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37581636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000632 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rawiczpruszynskikarol techniquesofstaginglaparoscopyandperitonealfluidassessmentingastriccancerasystematicreview AT erodotoumaria techniquesofstaginglaparoscopyandperitonealfluidassessmentingastriccancerasystematicreview AT pelczuzanna techniquesofstaginglaparoscopyandperitonealfluidassessmentingastriccancerasystematicreview AT sedłakkatarzyna techniquesofstaginglaparoscopyandperitonealfluidassessmentingastriccancerasystematicreview AT polkowskiwojciech techniquesofstaginglaparoscopyandperitonealfluidassessmentingastriccancerasystematicreview AT pawliktimothym techniquesofstaginglaparoscopyandperitonealfluidassessmentingastriccancerasystematicreview AT wijnhovenbaspl techniquesofstaginglaparoscopyandperitonealfluidassessmentingastriccancerasystematicreview |