Cargando…

A Comparison of Optical Biometers Used in Children for Myopia Control

Purpose To assess the reproducibility (i.e., inter-device reliability) of the biometers Topcon MYAH, Oculus Myopia Master, and Haag-Streit Lenstar LS900 with the Carl Zeiss IOLMaster 700 and the intra-subject repeatability in myopic children in order to reliably detect axial growth for myopia manage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mattern, Ann-Isabel, Neller, Kai, Devenijn, Machteld, Schwahn, Hartmut, Langenbucher, Achim, Seitz, Berthold, Kaymak, Hakan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37364606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2117-9335
_version_ 1785135977205858304
author Mattern, Ann-Isabel
Neller, Kai
Devenijn, Machteld
Schwahn, Hartmut
Langenbucher, Achim
Seitz, Berthold
Kaymak, Hakan
author_facet Mattern, Ann-Isabel
Neller, Kai
Devenijn, Machteld
Schwahn, Hartmut
Langenbucher, Achim
Seitz, Berthold
Kaymak, Hakan
author_sort Mattern, Ann-Isabel
collection PubMed
description Purpose To assess the reproducibility (i.e., inter-device reliability) of the biometers Topcon MYAH, Oculus Myopia Master, and Haag-Streit Lenstar LS900 with the Carl Zeiss IOLMaster 700 and the intra-subject repeatability in myopic children in order to reliably detect axial growth for myopia management. Methods Twenty-two myopic children (11.1 ± 2.4 yr) with a spherical equivalent of − 3.53 ± 2.35 D were examined with each of the biometers to assess axial length (AL) and corneal parameters (steepK, flatK, meanK, vectors J0, J45), and16 of these children agreed to a second round of measurements. Reproducibility of the first measurements between the IOLMaster and every other biometer was assessed employing a Bland-Altman approach and paired Studentʼs t-test. Repeatability was assessed as intra-subject standard deviation and was used to estimate the minimum time interval required between two AL measurements to reliably detect axial growth of an eye of at least 0.1 mm/year. Results Repeatability for AL measurements was as follows: IOLMaster: 0.05 mm, Myopia Master: 0.06 mm, Myah: 0.06 mm, Lenstar: 0.04 mm; the respective minimal time interval for axial growth assessment in myopia management was estimated as 5.6, 6.6, 6.7, and 5.0 months, respectively. Best reproducibility of the AL measurement was found between IOLMaster and Lenstar [95% Limits of Agreement (LoA) for reproducibility − 0.06 to 0.02]. As regards to the measured means, Lenstar gave measures of AL that were longer than with the IOLMaster by 0.02 mm (p < 0.001). Myopia Master measures of meanK were significantly lower (by 0.21 D with p < 0.001) than the values from the IOLMaster. As for J0, all biometers deviated significantly from IOLMaster measurements (p < 0.05). Conclusion Generally good agreement was observed between all the biometers. When assessing myopia progression in children, a time frame of at least 6 months between the AL measurements is advisable in order to reliably determine any deviation from a normal growth pattern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10651350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106513502023-08-01 A Comparison of Optical Biometers Used in Children for Myopia Control Mattern, Ann-Isabel Neller, Kai Devenijn, Machteld Schwahn, Hartmut Langenbucher, Achim Seitz, Berthold Kaymak, Hakan Klin Monbl Augenheilkd Purpose To assess the reproducibility (i.e., inter-device reliability) of the biometers Topcon MYAH, Oculus Myopia Master, and Haag-Streit Lenstar LS900 with the Carl Zeiss IOLMaster 700 and the intra-subject repeatability in myopic children in order to reliably detect axial growth for myopia management. Methods Twenty-two myopic children (11.1 ± 2.4 yr) with a spherical equivalent of − 3.53 ± 2.35 D were examined with each of the biometers to assess axial length (AL) and corneal parameters (steepK, flatK, meanK, vectors J0, J45), and16 of these children agreed to a second round of measurements. Reproducibility of the first measurements between the IOLMaster and every other biometer was assessed employing a Bland-Altman approach and paired Studentʼs t-test. Repeatability was assessed as intra-subject standard deviation and was used to estimate the minimum time interval required between two AL measurements to reliably detect axial growth of an eye of at least 0.1 mm/year. Results Repeatability for AL measurements was as follows: IOLMaster: 0.05 mm, Myopia Master: 0.06 mm, Myah: 0.06 mm, Lenstar: 0.04 mm; the respective minimal time interval for axial growth assessment in myopia management was estimated as 5.6, 6.6, 6.7, and 5.0 months, respectively. Best reproducibility of the AL measurement was found between IOLMaster and Lenstar [95% Limits of Agreement (LoA) for reproducibility − 0.06 to 0.02]. As regards to the measured means, Lenstar gave measures of AL that were longer than with the IOLMaster by 0.02 mm (p < 0.001). Myopia Master measures of meanK were significantly lower (by 0.21 D with p < 0.001) than the values from the IOLMaster. As for J0, all biometers deviated significantly from IOLMaster measurements (p < 0.05). Conclusion Generally good agreement was observed between all the biometers. When assessing myopia progression in children, a time frame of at least 6 months between the AL measurements is advisable in order to reliably determine any deviation from a normal growth pattern. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10651350/ /pubmed/37364606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2117-9335 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Mattern, Ann-Isabel
Neller, Kai
Devenijn, Machteld
Schwahn, Hartmut
Langenbucher, Achim
Seitz, Berthold
Kaymak, Hakan
A Comparison of Optical Biometers Used in Children for Myopia Control
title A Comparison of Optical Biometers Used in Children for Myopia Control
title_full A Comparison of Optical Biometers Used in Children for Myopia Control
title_fullStr A Comparison of Optical Biometers Used in Children for Myopia Control
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Optical Biometers Used in Children for Myopia Control
title_short A Comparison of Optical Biometers Used in Children for Myopia Control
title_sort comparison of optical biometers used in children for myopia control
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37364606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2117-9335
work_keys_str_mv AT matternannisabel acomparisonofopticalbiometersusedinchildrenformyopiacontrol
AT nellerkai acomparisonofopticalbiometersusedinchildrenformyopiacontrol
AT devenijnmachteld acomparisonofopticalbiometersusedinchildrenformyopiacontrol
AT schwahnhartmut acomparisonofopticalbiometersusedinchildrenformyopiacontrol
AT langenbucherachim acomparisonofopticalbiometersusedinchildrenformyopiacontrol
AT seitzberthold acomparisonofopticalbiometersusedinchildrenformyopiacontrol
AT kaymakhakan acomparisonofopticalbiometersusedinchildrenformyopiacontrol
AT matternannisabel comparisonofopticalbiometersusedinchildrenformyopiacontrol
AT nellerkai comparisonofopticalbiometersusedinchildrenformyopiacontrol
AT devenijnmachteld comparisonofopticalbiometersusedinchildrenformyopiacontrol
AT schwahnhartmut comparisonofopticalbiometersusedinchildrenformyopiacontrol
AT langenbucherachim comparisonofopticalbiometersusedinchildrenformyopiacontrol
AT seitzberthold comparisonofopticalbiometersusedinchildrenformyopiacontrol
AT kaymakhakan comparisonofopticalbiometersusedinchildrenformyopiacontrol