Cargando…

Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The accuracy of endosonographers in diagnosing gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is influenced by experience and subjectivity. Artificial intelligence (AI) has achieved remarkable development in this field. This study aimed to develop an AI-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Yi, Wu, Jiachuan, Hu, Minhui, Zhong, Qinghua, Er, Limian, Shi, Huihui, Cheng, Weihui, Chen, Ke, Liu, Yuan, Qiu, Bingfeng, Xu, Qiancheng, Lai, Guangshun, Wang, Yufeng, Luo, Yuxuan, Mu, Jinbao, Zhang, Wenjie, Zhi, Min, Sun, Jiachen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36700302
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl220347
_version_ 1785135985004118016
author Lu, Yi
Wu, Jiachuan
Hu, Minhui
Zhong, Qinghua
Er, Limian
Shi, Huihui
Cheng, Weihui
Chen, Ke
Liu, Yuan
Qiu, Bingfeng
Xu, Qiancheng
Lai, Guangshun
Wang, Yufeng
Luo, Yuxuan
Mu, Jinbao
Zhang, Wenjie
Zhi, Min
Sun, Jiachen
author_facet Lu, Yi
Wu, Jiachuan
Hu, Minhui
Zhong, Qinghua
Er, Limian
Shi, Huihui
Cheng, Weihui
Chen, Ke
Liu, Yuan
Qiu, Bingfeng
Xu, Qiancheng
Lai, Guangshun
Wang, Yufeng
Luo, Yuxuan
Mu, Jinbao
Zhang, Wenjie
Zhi, Min
Sun, Jiachen
author_sort Lu, Yi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: The accuracy of endosonographers in diagnosing gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is influenced by experience and subjectivity. Artificial intelligence (AI) has achieved remarkable development in this field. This study aimed to develop an AI-based EUS diagnostic model for the diagnosis of SELs, and evaluated its efficacy with external validation. METHODS: We developed the EUS-AI model with ResNeSt50 using EUS images from two hospitals to predict the histopathology of the gastric SELs originating from muscularis propria. The diagnostic performance of the model was also validated using EUS images obtained from four other hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 2,057 images from 367 patients (375 SELs) were chosen to build the models, and 914 images from 106 patients (108 SELs) were chosen for external validation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the model for differentiating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and non-GISTs in the external validation sets by images were 82.01%, 68.22%, 86.77%, 59.86%, and 78.12%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in the external validation set by tumors were 83.75%, 71.43%, 89.33%, 60.61%, and 80.56%, respectively. The EUS-AI model showed better performance (especially specificity) than some endosonographers. The model helped improve the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of certain endosonographers. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an EUS-AI model to classify gastric SELs originating from muscularis propria into GISTs and non-GISTs with good accuracy. The model may help improve the diagnostic performance of endosonographers. Further work is required to develop a multi-modal EUS-AI system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10651383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106513832023-01-26 Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers Lu, Yi Wu, Jiachuan Hu, Minhui Zhong, Qinghua Er, Limian Shi, Huihui Cheng, Weihui Chen, Ke Liu, Yuan Qiu, Bingfeng Xu, Qiancheng Lai, Guangshun Wang, Yufeng Luo, Yuxuan Mu, Jinbao Zhang, Wenjie Zhi, Min Sun, Jiachen Gut Liver Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The accuracy of endosonographers in diagnosing gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is influenced by experience and subjectivity. Artificial intelligence (AI) has achieved remarkable development in this field. This study aimed to develop an AI-based EUS diagnostic model for the diagnosis of SELs, and evaluated its efficacy with external validation. METHODS: We developed the EUS-AI model with ResNeSt50 using EUS images from two hospitals to predict the histopathology of the gastric SELs originating from muscularis propria. The diagnostic performance of the model was also validated using EUS images obtained from four other hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 2,057 images from 367 patients (375 SELs) were chosen to build the models, and 914 images from 106 patients (108 SELs) were chosen for external validation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the model for differentiating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and non-GISTs in the external validation sets by images were 82.01%, 68.22%, 86.77%, 59.86%, and 78.12%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in the external validation set by tumors were 83.75%, 71.43%, 89.33%, 60.61%, and 80.56%, respectively. The EUS-AI model showed better performance (especially specificity) than some endosonographers. The model helped improve the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of certain endosonographers. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an EUS-AI model to classify gastric SELs originating from muscularis propria into GISTs and non-GISTs with good accuracy. The model may help improve the diagnostic performance of endosonographers. Further work is required to develop a multi-modal EUS-AI system. Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2023-11-15 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10651383/ /pubmed/36700302 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl220347 Text en Copyright © Gut and Liver. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lu, Yi
Wu, Jiachuan
Hu, Minhui
Zhong, Qinghua
Er, Limian
Shi, Huihui
Cheng, Weihui
Chen, Ke
Liu, Yuan
Qiu, Bingfeng
Xu, Qiancheng
Lai, Guangshun
Wang, Yufeng
Luo, Yuxuan
Mu, Jinbao
Zhang, Wenjie
Zhi, Min
Sun, Jiachen
Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers
title Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers
title_full Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers
title_fullStr Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers
title_short Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers
title_sort artificial intelligence in the prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors on endoscopic ultrasonography images: development, validation and comparison with endosonographers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36700302
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl220347
work_keys_str_mv AT luyi artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT wujiachuan artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT huminhui artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT zhongqinghua artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT erlimian artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT shihuihui artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT chengweihui artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT chenke artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT liuyuan artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT qiubingfeng artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT xuqiancheng artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT laiguangshun artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT wangyufeng artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT luoyuxuan artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT mujinbao artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT zhangwenjie artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT zhimin artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers
AT sunjiachen artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers