Cargando…
Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The accuracy of endosonographers in diagnosing gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is influenced by experience and subjectivity. Artificial intelligence (AI) has achieved remarkable development in this field. This study aimed to develop an AI-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36700302 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl220347 |
_version_ | 1785135985004118016 |
---|---|
author | Lu, Yi Wu, Jiachuan Hu, Minhui Zhong, Qinghua Er, Limian Shi, Huihui Cheng, Weihui Chen, Ke Liu, Yuan Qiu, Bingfeng Xu, Qiancheng Lai, Guangshun Wang, Yufeng Luo, Yuxuan Mu, Jinbao Zhang, Wenjie Zhi, Min Sun, Jiachen |
author_facet | Lu, Yi Wu, Jiachuan Hu, Minhui Zhong, Qinghua Er, Limian Shi, Huihui Cheng, Weihui Chen, Ke Liu, Yuan Qiu, Bingfeng Xu, Qiancheng Lai, Guangshun Wang, Yufeng Luo, Yuxuan Mu, Jinbao Zhang, Wenjie Zhi, Min Sun, Jiachen |
author_sort | Lu, Yi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: The accuracy of endosonographers in diagnosing gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is influenced by experience and subjectivity. Artificial intelligence (AI) has achieved remarkable development in this field. This study aimed to develop an AI-based EUS diagnostic model for the diagnosis of SELs, and evaluated its efficacy with external validation. METHODS: We developed the EUS-AI model with ResNeSt50 using EUS images from two hospitals to predict the histopathology of the gastric SELs originating from muscularis propria. The diagnostic performance of the model was also validated using EUS images obtained from four other hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 2,057 images from 367 patients (375 SELs) were chosen to build the models, and 914 images from 106 patients (108 SELs) were chosen for external validation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the model for differentiating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and non-GISTs in the external validation sets by images were 82.01%, 68.22%, 86.77%, 59.86%, and 78.12%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in the external validation set by tumors were 83.75%, 71.43%, 89.33%, 60.61%, and 80.56%, respectively. The EUS-AI model showed better performance (especially specificity) than some endosonographers. The model helped improve the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of certain endosonographers. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an EUS-AI model to classify gastric SELs originating from muscularis propria into GISTs and non-GISTs with good accuracy. The model may help improve the diagnostic performance of endosonographers. Further work is required to develop a multi-modal EUS-AI system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10651383 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Editorial Office of Gut and Liver |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106513832023-01-26 Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers Lu, Yi Wu, Jiachuan Hu, Minhui Zhong, Qinghua Er, Limian Shi, Huihui Cheng, Weihui Chen, Ke Liu, Yuan Qiu, Bingfeng Xu, Qiancheng Lai, Guangshun Wang, Yufeng Luo, Yuxuan Mu, Jinbao Zhang, Wenjie Zhi, Min Sun, Jiachen Gut Liver Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The accuracy of endosonographers in diagnosing gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is influenced by experience and subjectivity. Artificial intelligence (AI) has achieved remarkable development in this field. This study aimed to develop an AI-based EUS diagnostic model for the diagnosis of SELs, and evaluated its efficacy with external validation. METHODS: We developed the EUS-AI model with ResNeSt50 using EUS images from two hospitals to predict the histopathology of the gastric SELs originating from muscularis propria. The diagnostic performance of the model was also validated using EUS images obtained from four other hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 2,057 images from 367 patients (375 SELs) were chosen to build the models, and 914 images from 106 patients (108 SELs) were chosen for external validation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the model for differentiating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and non-GISTs in the external validation sets by images were 82.01%, 68.22%, 86.77%, 59.86%, and 78.12%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in the external validation set by tumors were 83.75%, 71.43%, 89.33%, 60.61%, and 80.56%, respectively. The EUS-AI model showed better performance (especially specificity) than some endosonographers. The model helped improve the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of certain endosonographers. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an EUS-AI model to classify gastric SELs originating from muscularis propria into GISTs and non-GISTs with good accuracy. The model may help improve the diagnostic performance of endosonographers. Further work is required to develop a multi-modal EUS-AI system. Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2023-11-15 2023-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10651383/ /pubmed/36700302 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl220347 Text en Copyright © Gut and Liver. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lu, Yi Wu, Jiachuan Hu, Minhui Zhong, Qinghua Er, Limian Shi, Huihui Cheng, Weihui Chen, Ke Liu, Yuan Qiu, Bingfeng Xu, Qiancheng Lai, Guangshun Wang, Yufeng Luo, Yuxuan Mu, Jinbao Zhang, Wenjie Zhi, Min Sun, Jiachen Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers |
title | Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers |
title_full | Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers |
title_fullStr | Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers |
title_short | Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers |
title_sort | artificial intelligence in the prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors on endoscopic ultrasonography images: development, validation and comparison with endosonographers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36700302 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl220347 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luyi artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT wujiachuan artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT huminhui artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT zhongqinghua artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT erlimian artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT shihuihui artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT chengweihui artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT chenke artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT liuyuan artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT qiubingfeng artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT xuqiancheng artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT laiguangshun artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT wangyufeng artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT luoyuxuan artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT mujinbao artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT zhangwenjie artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT zhimin artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers AT sunjiachen artificialintelligenceinthepredictionofgastrointestinalstromaltumorsonendoscopicultrasonographyimagesdevelopmentvalidationandcomparisonwithendosonographers |