Cargando…
LungCARE: Encouraging Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening—a Randomized Trial
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening (LCS) is recommended for individuals at high risk due to age and smoking history after a shared decision-making conversation. However, little is known about best strategies for incorporating shared decision-making, especially in a busy primary care setting. OBJECTIV...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08189-1 |
_version_ | 1785136028694085632 |
---|---|
author | Walsh, Judith M. E. Karliner, Leah Smith, Ashley Leykin, Yan Gregorich, Steven E. Livaudais-Toman, Jennifer Velazquez, Ana I. Lowenstein, Margaret Kaplan, Celia P. |
author_facet | Walsh, Judith M. E. Karliner, Leah Smith, Ashley Leykin, Yan Gregorich, Steven E. Livaudais-Toman, Jennifer Velazquez, Ana I. Lowenstein, Margaret Kaplan, Celia P. |
author_sort | Walsh, Judith M. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening (LCS) is recommended for individuals at high risk due to age and smoking history after a shared decision-making conversation. However, little is known about best strategies for incorporating shared decision-making, especially in a busy primary care setting. OBJECTIVE: To develop a novel tool, Lung Cancer Assessment of Risk and Education (LungCARE) to guide LCS decisions among eligible primary care patients. DESIGN: Pilot cluster randomized controlled trial of LungCARE versus usual care. PARTICIPANTS: Patients of providers in a university primary care clinic, who met criteria for LCS. INTERVENTION: Providers were randomized to LungCARE intervention or control. LungCARE participants completed a computer tablet-based video assessment of lung cancer educational needs in the waiting room prior to a primary care visit. Patient and provider both received a summary handout of patient concerns and responses. MAIN MEASURES: All eligible patients completed baseline interviews by telephone. One week after the index visit, participants completed a follow-up telephone survey that assessed patient-physician discussion of LCS, referral to and scheduling of LCS, as well as LCS knowledge and acceptability of LungCARE. Two months after index visit, we reviewed patients’ electronic health records (EHRs) for evidence of a shared decision-making conversation and referral to and receipt of LCS. KEY RESULTS: A total of 66 participants completed baseline and follow-up visits (34: LungCARE; 32: usual care). Mean age was 65.9 (± 6.0). Based on EHR review, compared to usual care, LungCARE participants were more likely to have discussed LCS with their physicians (56% vs 25%; p = 0.04) and to be referred to LCS (44% vs 13%; p < 0.02). Intervention participants were also more likely to complete LCS (32% vs 13%; p < 0.01) and had higher knowledge scores (mean score 6.5 (± 1.7) vs 5.5 (± 1.4; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: LungCARE increased discussion, referral, and completion of LCS and improved LCS knowledge. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03862001. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08189-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10651593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106515932023-08-31 LungCARE: Encouraging Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening—a Randomized Trial Walsh, Judith M. E. Karliner, Leah Smith, Ashley Leykin, Yan Gregorich, Steven E. Livaudais-Toman, Jennifer Velazquez, Ana I. Lowenstein, Margaret Kaplan, Celia P. J Gen Intern Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening (LCS) is recommended for individuals at high risk due to age and smoking history after a shared decision-making conversation. However, little is known about best strategies for incorporating shared decision-making, especially in a busy primary care setting. OBJECTIVE: To develop a novel tool, Lung Cancer Assessment of Risk and Education (LungCARE) to guide LCS decisions among eligible primary care patients. DESIGN: Pilot cluster randomized controlled trial of LungCARE versus usual care. PARTICIPANTS: Patients of providers in a university primary care clinic, who met criteria for LCS. INTERVENTION: Providers were randomized to LungCARE intervention or control. LungCARE participants completed a computer tablet-based video assessment of lung cancer educational needs in the waiting room prior to a primary care visit. Patient and provider both received a summary handout of patient concerns and responses. MAIN MEASURES: All eligible patients completed baseline interviews by telephone. One week after the index visit, participants completed a follow-up telephone survey that assessed patient-physician discussion of LCS, referral to and scheduling of LCS, as well as LCS knowledge and acceptability of LungCARE. Two months after index visit, we reviewed patients’ electronic health records (EHRs) for evidence of a shared decision-making conversation and referral to and receipt of LCS. KEY RESULTS: A total of 66 participants completed baseline and follow-up visits (34: LungCARE; 32: usual care). Mean age was 65.9 (± 6.0). Based on EHR review, compared to usual care, LungCARE participants were more likely to have discussed LCS with their physicians (56% vs 25%; p = 0.04) and to be referred to LCS (44% vs 13%; p < 0.02). Intervention participants were also more likely to complete LCS (32% vs 13%; p < 0.01) and had higher knowledge scores (mean score 6.5 (± 1.7) vs 5.5 (± 1.4; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: LungCARE increased discussion, referral, and completion of LCS and improved LCS knowledge. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03862001. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08189-1. Springer International Publishing 2023-08-31 2023-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10651593/ /pubmed/37653203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08189-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Walsh, Judith M. E. Karliner, Leah Smith, Ashley Leykin, Yan Gregorich, Steven E. Livaudais-Toman, Jennifer Velazquez, Ana I. Lowenstein, Margaret Kaplan, Celia P. LungCARE: Encouraging Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening—a Randomized Trial |
title | LungCARE: Encouraging Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening—a Randomized Trial |
title_full | LungCARE: Encouraging Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening—a Randomized Trial |
title_fullStr | LungCARE: Encouraging Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening—a Randomized Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | LungCARE: Encouraging Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening—a Randomized Trial |
title_short | LungCARE: Encouraging Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening—a Randomized Trial |
title_sort | lungcare: encouraging shared decision-making in lung cancer screening—a randomized trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08189-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walshjudithme lungcareencouragingshareddecisionmakinginlungcancerscreeningarandomizedtrial AT karlinerleah lungcareencouragingshareddecisionmakinginlungcancerscreeningarandomizedtrial AT smithashley lungcareencouragingshareddecisionmakinginlungcancerscreeningarandomizedtrial AT leykinyan lungcareencouragingshareddecisionmakinginlungcancerscreeningarandomizedtrial AT gregorichstevene lungcareencouragingshareddecisionmakinginlungcancerscreeningarandomizedtrial AT livaudaistomanjennifer lungcareencouragingshareddecisionmakinginlungcancerscreeningarandomizedtrial AT velazquezanai lungcareencouragingshareddecisionmakinginlungcancerscreeningarandomizedtrial AT lowensteinmargaret lungcareencouragingshareddecisionmakinginlungcancerscreeningarandomizedtrial AT kaplanceliap lungcareencouragingshareddecisionmakinginlungcancerscreeningarandomizedtrial |