Cargando…

Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020

Biomarkers can guide precision medicine in clinical trials and practice. They can increase clinical trials' efficiency through selection of study populations more likely to benefit from treatment, thus increasing statistical power and reducing sample size requirements or study duration. We perf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bakker, Elisabeth, Starokozhko, Viktoriia, Kraaijvanger, Jet W. M., Heerspink, Hiddo J. L., Mol, Peter G. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37853917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13641
_version_ 1785136037575524352
author Bakker, Elisabeth
Starokozhko, Viktoriia
Kraaijvanger, Jet W. M.
Heerspink, Hiddo J. L.
Mol, Peter G. M.
author_facet Bakker, Elisabeth
Starokozhko, Viktoriia
Kraaijvanger, Jet W. M.
Heerspink, Hiddo J. L.
Mol, Peter G. M.
author_sort Bakker, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description Biomarkers can guide precision medicine in clinical trials and practice. They can increase clinical trials' efficiency through selection of study populations more likely to benefit from treatment, thus increasing statistical power and reducing sample size requirements or study duration. We performed a narrative synthesis to explore biomarker utilization for patient selection to guide precision medicine trials in marketing authorization dossiers of centrally approved medicines in Europe between 2018 and 2020 and analyzed in‐depth those that eventually included biomarkers in the medicines' indications. From 119 eligible products, 26 included a biomarker in the indication, of which most were oncology products (n = 15). Included biomarkers were often known from literature or from previously approved products in the European Union or the United States. Additionally, 52 dossiers mentioned one or more biomarkers for patient selection in their clinical efficacy and safety information. Although these were not always included in the medicines' indication, they were often implicitly embedded in condition definitions adopted from clinical guidelines or practice. In 15 out of the 26 medicines with a biomarker‐guided indication, only biomarker‐positive populations were included in the main clinical studies supporting the marketing authorization. These studies were mostly randomized controlled trials or single‐arm trials; only two products were studied for multiple indications in an innovative basket trial. Definitions of biomarkers could be subject of debate and needed adaptation after post hoc analyses requested by the assessment committee in four cases, stressing the importance of thorough justification of these definitions to include the right population for an optimal benefit–risk balance, enabling precise medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10651650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106516502023-10-18 Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020 Bakker, Elisabeth Starokozhko, Viktoriia Kraaijvanger, Jet W. M. Heerspink, Hiddo J. L. Mol, Peter G. M. Clin Transl Sci Research Biomarkers can guide precision medicine in clinical trials and practice. They can increase clinical trials' efficiency through selection of study populations more likely to benefit from treatment, thus increasing statistical power and reducing sample size requirements or study duration. We performed a narrative synthesis to explore biomarker utilization for patient selection to guide precision medicine trials in marketing authorization dossiers of centrally approved medicines in Europe between 2018 and 2020 and analyzed in‐depth those that eventually included biomarkers in the medicines' indications. From 119 eligible products, 26 included a biomarker in the indication, of which most were oncology products (n = 15). Included biomarkers were often known from literature or from previously approved products in the European Union or the United States. Additionally, 52 dossiers mentioned one or more biomarkers for patient selection in their clinical efficacy and safety information. Although these were not always included in the medicines' indication, they were often implicitly embedded in condition definitions adopted from clinical guidelines or practice. In 15 out of the 26 medicines with a biomarker‐guided indication, only biomarker‐positive populations were included in the main clinical studies supporting the marketing authorization. These studies were mostly randomized controlled trials or single‐arm trials; only two products were studied for multiple indications in an innovative basket trial. Definitions of biomarkers could be subject of debate and needed adaptation after post hoc analyses requested by the assessment committee in four cases, stressing the importance of thorough justification of these definitions to include the right population for an optimal benefit–risk balance, enabling precise medicine. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10651650/ /pubmed/37853917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13641 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research
Bakker, Elisabeth
Starokozhko, Viktoriia
Kraaijvanger, Jet W. M.
Heerspink, Hiddo J. L.
Mol, Peter G. M.
Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020
title Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020
title_full Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020
title_fullStr Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020
title_full_unstemmed Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020
title_short Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020
title_sort precision medicine in regulatory decision making: biomarkers used for patient selection in european public assessment reports from 2018 to 2020
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37853917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13641
work_keys_str_mv AT bakkerelisabeth precisionmedicineinregulatorydecisionmakingbiomarkersusedforpatientselectionineuropeanpublicassessmentreportsfrom2018to2020
AT starokozhkoviktoriia precisionmedicineinregulatorydecisionmakingbiomarkersusedforpatientselectionineuropeanpublicassessmentreportsfrom2018to2020
AT kraaijvangerjetwm precisionmedicineinregulatorydecisionmakingbiomarkersusedforpatientselectionineuropeanpublicassessmentreportsfrom2018to2020
AT heerspinkhiddojl precisionmedicineinregulatorydecisionmakingbiomarkersusedforpatientselectionineuropeanpublicassessmentreportsfrom2018to2020
AT molpetergm precisionmedicineinregulatorydecisionmakingbiomarkersusedforpatientselectionineuropeanpublicassessmentreportsfrom2018to2020