Cargando…
Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020
Biomarkers can guide precision medicine in clinical trials and practice. They can increase clinical trials' efficiency through selection of study populations more likely to benefit from treatment, thus increasing statistical power and reducing sample size requirements or study duration. We perf...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37853917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13641 |
_version_ | 1785136037575524352 |
---|---|
author | Bakker, Elisabeth Starokozhko, Viktoriia Kraaijvanger, Jet W. M. Heerspink, Hiddo J. L. Mol, Peter G. M. |
author_facet | Bakker, Elisabeth Starokozhko, Viktoriia Kraaijvanger, Jet W. M. Heerspink, Hiddo J. L. Mol, Peter G. M. |
author_sort | Bakker, Elisabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biomarkers can guide precision medicine in clinical trials and practice. They can increase clinical trials' efficiency through selection of study populations more likely to benefit from treatment, thus increasing statistical power and reducing sample size requirements or study duration. We performed a narrative synthesis to explore biomarker utilization for patient selection to guide precision medicine trials in marketing authorization dossiers of centrally approved medicines in Europe between 2018 and 2020 and analyzed in‐depth those that eventually included biomarkers in the medicines' indications. From 119 eligible products, 26 included a biomarker in the indication, of which most were oncology products (n = 15). Included biomarkers were often known from literature or from previously approved products in the European Union or the United States. Additionally, 52 dossiers mentioned one or more biomarkers for patient selection in their clinical efficacy and safety information. Although these were not always included in the medicines' indication, they were often implicitly embedded in condition definitions adopted from clinical guidelines or practice. In 15 out of the 26 medicines with a biomarker‐guided indication, only biomarker‐positive populations were included in the main clinical studies supporting the marketing authorization. These studies were mostly randomized controlled trials or single‐arm trials; only two products were studied for multiple indications in an innovative basket trial. Definitions of biomarkers could be subject of debate and needed adaptation after post hoc analyses requested by the assessment committee in four cases, stressing the importance of thorough justification of these definitions to include the right population for an optimal benefit–risk balance, enabling precise medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10651650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106516502023-10-18 Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020 Bakker, Elisabeth Starokozhko, Viktoriia Kraaijvanger, Jet W. M. Heerspink, Hiddo J. L. Mol, Peter G. M. Clin Transl Sci Research Biomarkers can guide precision medicine in clinical trials and practice. They can increase clinical trials' efficiency through selection of study populations more likely to benefit from treatment, thus increasing statistical power and reducing sample size requirements or study duration. We performed a narrative synthesis to explore biomarker utilization for patient selection to guide precision medicine trials in marketing authorization dossiers of centrally approved medicines in Europe between 2018 and 2020 and analyzed in‐depth those that eventually included biomarkers in the medicines' indications. From 119 eligible products, 26 included a biomarker in the indication, of which most were oncology products (n = 15). Included biomarkers were often known from literature or from previously approved products in the European Union or the United States. Additionally, 52 dossiers mentioned one or more biomarkers for patient selection in their clinical efficacy and safety information. Although these were not always included in the medicines' indication, they were often implicitly embedded in condition definitions adopted from clinical guidelines or practice. In 15 out of the 26 medicines with a biomarker‐guided indication, only biomarker‐positive populations were included in the main clinical studies supporting the marketing authorization. These studies were mostly randomized controlled trials or single‐arm trials; only two products were studied for multiple indications in an innovative basket trial. Definitions of biomarkers could be subject of debate and needed adaptation after post hoc analyses requested by the assessment committee in four cases, stressing the importance of thorough justification of these definitions to include the right population for an optimal benefit–risk balance, enabling precise medicine. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10651650/ /pubmed/37853917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13641 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Bakker, Elisabeth Starokozhko, Viktoriia Kraaijvanger, Jet W. M. Heerspink, Hiddo J. L. Mol, Peter G. M. Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020 |
title | Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020 |
title_full | Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020 |
title_fullStr | Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020 |
title_short | Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020 |
title_sort | precision medicine in regulatory decision making: biomarkers used for patient selection in european public assessment reports from 2018 to 2020 |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37853917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.13641 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakkerelisabeth precisionmedicineinregulatorydecisionmakingbiomarkersusedforpatientselectionineuropeanpublicassessmentreportsfrom2018to2020 AT starokozhkoviktoriia precisionmedicineinregulatorydecisionmakingbiomarkersusedforpatientselectionineuropeanpublicassessmentreportsfrom2018to2020 AT kraaijvangerjetwm precisionmedicineinregulatorydecisionmakingbiomarkersusedforpatientselectionineuropeanpublicassessmentreportsfrom2018to2020 AT heerspinkhiddojl precisionmedicineinregulatorydecisionmakingbiomarkersusedforpatientselectionineuropeanpublicassessmentreportsfrom2018to2020 AT molpetergm precisionmedicineinregulatorydecisionmakingbiomarkersusedforpatientselectionineuropeanpublicassessmentreportsfrom2018to2020 |