Cargando…

Prediction of ovulation: new insight into an old challenge

Ultrasound monitoring and hormonal blood testing are considered by many as an accurate method to predict ovulation time. However, uniform and validated algorithms for predicting ovulation have yet to be defined. Daily hormonal tests and transvaginal ultrasounds were recorded to develop an algorithm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maman, Ettie, Adashi, Eli Y., Baum, Micha, Hourvitz, Ariel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37968377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47241-2
_version_ 1785147643216789504
author Maman, Ettie
Adashi, Eli Y.
Baum, Micha
Hourvitz, Ariel
author_facet Maman, Ettie
Adashi, Eli Y.
Baum, Micha
Hourvitz, Ariel
author_sort Maman, Ettie
collection PubMed
description Ultrasound monitoring and hormonal blood testing are considered by many as an accurate method to predict ovulation time. However, uniform and validated algorithms for predicting ovulation have yet to be defined. Daily hormonal tests and transvaginal ultrasounds were recorded to develop an algorithm for ovulation prediction. The rupture of the leading ovarian follicle was a marker for ovulation day. The model was validated retrospectively on natural cycles frozen embryo transfer cycles with documented ovulation. Circulating levels of LH or its relative variation failed, by themselves, to reliably predict ovulation. Any decrease in estrogen was 100% associated with ovulation emergence the same day or the next day. Progesterone levels > 2 nmol/L had low specificity to predict ovulation the next day (62.7%), yet its sensitivity was high (91.5%). A model for ovulation prediction, combining the three hormone levels and ultrasound was created with an accuracy of 95% to 100% depending on the combination of the hormone levels. Model validation showed correct ovulation prediction in 97% of these cycles. We present an accurate ovulation prediction algorithm. The algorithm is simple and user-friendly so both reproductive endocrinologists and general practitioners can use it to benefit their patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10651856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106518562023-11-15 Prediction of ovulation: new insight into an old challenge Maman, Ettie Adashi, Eli Y. Baum, Micha Hourvitz, Ariel Sci Rep Article Ultrasound monitoring and hormonal blood testing are considered by many as an accurate method to predict ovulation time. However, uniform and validated algorithms for predicting ovulation have yet to be defined. Daily hormonal tests and transvaginal ultrasounds were recorded to develop an algorithm for ovulation prediction. The rupture of the leading ovarian follicle was a marker for ovulation day. The model was validated retrospectively on natural cycles frozen embryo transfer cycles with documented ovulation. Circulating levels of LH or its relative variation failed, by themselves, to reliably predict ovulation. Any decrease in estrogen was 100% associated with ovulation emergence the same day or the next day. Progesterone levels > 2 nmol/L had low specificity to predict ovulation the next day (62.7%), yet its sensitivity was high (91.5%). A model for ovulation prediction, combining the three hormone levels and ultrasound was created with an accuracy of 95% to 100% depending on the combination of the hormone levels. Model validation showed correct ovulation prediction in 97% of these cycles. We present an accurate ovulation prediction algorithm. The algorithm is simple and user-friendly so both reproductive endocrinologists and general practitioners can use it to benefit their patients. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10651856/ /pubmed/37968377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47241-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Maman, Ettie
Adashi, Eli Y.
Baum, Micha
Hourvitz, Ariel
Prediction of ovulation: new insight into an old challenge
title Prediction of ovulation: new insight into an old challenge
title_full Prediction of ovulation: new insight into an old challenge
title_fullStr Prediction of ovulation: new insight into an old challenge
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of ovulation: new insight into an old challenge
title_short Prediction of ovulation: new insight into an old challenge
title_sort prediction of ovulation: new insight into an old challenge
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37968377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47241-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mamanettie predictionofovulationnewinsightintoanoldchallenge
AT adashieliy predictionofovulationnewinsightintoanoldchallenge
AT baummicha predictionofovulationnewinsightintoanoldchallenge
AT hourvitzariel predictionofovulationnewinsightintoanoldchallenge