Cargando…

Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring versus arterial waveform-based monitoring during liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study

Although pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has been used during liver transplantation surgery, the usefulness of PAC has rarely been investigated. We evaluated whether the use of PAC is associated with better clinical outcomes compared to arterial waveform-based monitoring after liver transplantation....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Ji-Yoon, Sohn, Jin Young, Lim, Leerang, Cho, Hyeyeon, Ju, Jae-Woo, Yoon, Hyun-Kyu, Yang, Seong-Mi, Lee, Ho-Jin, Kim, Won Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37968287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46173-1
_version_ 1785147658636099584
author Jung, Ji-Yoon
Sohn, Jin Young
Lim, Leerang
Cho, Hyeyeon
Ju, Jae-Woo
Yoon, Hyun-Kyu
Yang, Seong-Mi
Lee, Ho-Jin
Kim, Won Ho
author_facet Jung, Ji-Yoon
Sohn, Jin Young
Lim, Leerang
Cho, Hyeyeon
Ju, Jae-Woo
Yoon, Hyun-Kyu
Yang, Seong-Mi
Lee, Ho-Jin
Kim, Won Ho
author_sort Jung, Ji-Yoon
collection PubMed
description Although pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has been used during liver transplantation surgery, the usefulness of PAC has rarely been investigated. We evaluated whether the use of PAC is associated with better clinical outcomes compared to arterial waveform-based monitoring after liver transplantation. A total of 1565 cases undergoing liver transplantation were reviewed. We determined whether patients received PAC or not and divided our cohort into the PAC with hemodynamic monitoring using PAC and the non-PAC with arterial waveform-based monitoring using FloTrac-Vigileo. Propensity score matching was performed. Acute kidney injury (AKI), early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and 1-year all-cause mortality or graft failure were compared in the matched cohorts. Logistic regression analysis was performed in the inverse probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) cohort for postoperative EAD and AKI, respectively. Five-year overall survival was compared between the two groups. In the matched cohort, there was no significant difference in the incidence of AKI, EAD, length of hospital or ICU stay, and 1-year all-cause mortality between the groups. In the IPTW cohort, the use of PAC was not a significant predictor for AKI or EAD (AKI: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.20 (0.47–1.56), p = 0.229; EAD: 0.99 (0.38–1.14), p = 0.323). There was no significant difference in the survival between groups after propensity score matching (Log-rank test p = 0.578). In conclusion, posttransplant clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the groups with and without PAC. Anesthetic management without the use of PAC may be possible in low-risk patients during liver transplantation. The risk should be carefully assessed by considering MELD scores, ischemic time, surgical history, previous treatment of underlying liver disease, and degree of portal and pulmonary hypertension. Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05457114 (registration date: July 15, 2022).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10651933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106519332023-11-15 Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring versus arterial waveform-based monitoring during liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study Jung, Ji-Yoon Sohn, Jin Young Lim, Leerang Cho, Hyeyeon Ju, Jae-Woo Yoon, Hyun-Kyu Yang, Seong-Mi Lee, Ho-Jin Kim, Won Ho Sci Rep Article Although pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has been used during liver transplantation surgery, the usefulness of PAC has rarely been investigated. We evaluated whether the use of PAC is associated with better clinical outcomes compared to arterial waveform-based monitoring after liver transplantation. A total of 1565 cases undergoing liver transplantation were reviewed. We determined whether patients received PAC or not and divided our cohort into the PAC with hemodynamic monitoring using PAC and the non-PAC with arterial waveform-based monitoring using FloTrac-Vigileo. Propensity score matching was performed. Acute kidney injury (AKI), early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and 1-year all-cause mortality or graft failure were compared in the matched cohorts. Logistic regression analysis was performed in the inverse probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) cohort for postoperative EAD and AKI, respectively. Five-year overall survival was compared between the two groups. In the matched cohort, there was no significant difference in the incidence of AKI, EAD, length of hospital or ICU stay, and 1-year all-cause mortality between the groups. In the IPTW cohort, the use of PAC was not a significant predictor for AKI or EAD (AKI: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.20 (0.47–1.56), p = 0.229; EAD: 0.99 (0.38–1.14), p = 0.323). There was no significant difference in the survival between groups after propensity score matching (Log-rank test p = 0.578). In conclusion, posttransplant clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the groups with and without PAC. Anesthetic management without the use of PAC may be possible in low-risk patients during liver transplantation. The risk should be carefully assessed by considering MELD scores, ischemic time, surgical history, previous treatment of underlying liver disease, and degree of portal and pulmonary hypertension. Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05457114 (registration date: July 15, 2022). Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10651933/ /pubmed/37968287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46173-1 Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Jung, Ji-Yoon
Sohn, Jin Young
Lim, Leerang
Cho, Hyeyeon
Ju, Jae-Woo
Yoon, Hyun-Kyu
Yang, Seong-Mi
Lee, Ho-Jin
Kim, Won Ho
Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring versus arterial waveform-based monitoring during liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
title Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring versus arterial waveform-based monitoring during liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring versus arterial waveform-based monitoring during liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring versus arterial waveform-based monitoring during liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring versus arterial waveform-based monitoring during liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring versus arterial waveform-based monitoring during liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort pulmonary artery catheter monitoring versus arterial waveform-based monitoring during liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37968287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46173-1
work_keys_str_mv AT jungjiyoon pulmonaryarterycathetermonitoringversusarterialwaveformbasedmonitoringduringlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT sohnjinyoung pulmonaryarterycathetermonitoringversusarterialwaveformbasedmonitoringduringlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT limleerang pulmonaryarterycathetermonitoringversusarterialwaveformbasedmonitoringduringlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chohyeyeon pulmonaryarterycathetermonitoringversusarterialwaveformbasedmonitoringduringlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jujaewoo pulmonaryarterycathetermonitoringversusarterialwaveformbasedmonitoringduringlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yoonhyunkyu pulmonaryarterycathetermonitoringversusarterialwaveformbasedmonitoringduringlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yangseongmi pulmonaryarterycathetermonitoringversusarterialwaveformbasedmonitoringduringlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT leehojin pulmonaryarterycathetermonitoringversusarterialwaveformbasedmonitoringduringlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kimwonho pulmonaryarterycathetermonitoringversusarterialwaveformbasedmonitoringduringlivertransplantationaretrospectivecohortstudy