Cargando…

A neuromarker for deficit syndrome in schizophrenia from a combination of structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging

AIM: Deficit schizophrenia (DS), defined by primary and enduring negative symptoms, has been proposed as a promising homogeneous subtype of schizophrenia. It has been demonstrated that unimodal neuroimaging characteristics of DS were different from non‐deficit schizophrenia (NDS), however, whether m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Ju, Jiang, Rongtao, Tang, Xiaowei, Chen, Jiu, Yu, Miao, Zhou, Chao, Wang, Xiang, Zhang, Hongying, Huang, Chengbing, Yang, Yong, Zhang, Xiaobin, Cui, Zaixu, Zhang, Xiangrong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37288482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.14297
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: Deficit schizophrenia (DS), defined by primary and enduring negative symptoms, has been proposed as a promising homogeneous subtype of schizophrenia. It has been demonstrated that unimodal neuroimaging characteristics of DS were different from non‐deficit schizophrenia (NDS), however, whether multimodal‐based neuroimaging features could identify deficit syndrome remains to be determined. METHODS: Functional and structural multimodal magnetic resonance imaging of DS, NDS and healthy controls were scanned. Voxel‐based features of gray matter volume, fractional amplitude of low‐frequency fluctuations, and regional homogeneity were extracted. The support vector machine classification models were constructed using these features separately and jointly. The most discriminative features were defined as the first 10% of features with the greatest weights. Moreover, relevance vector regression was applied to explore the predictive values of these top‐weighted features in predicting negative symptoms. RESULTS: The multimodal classifier achieved a higher accuracy (75.48%) compared with the single modal model in distinguishing DS from NDS. The most predictive brain regions were mainly located in the default mode and visual networks, exhibiting differences between functional and structural features. Further, the identified discriminative features significantly predicted scores of diminished expressivity factor in DS but not NDS. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that local properties of brain regions extracted from multimodal imaging data could distinguish DS from NDS with a machine learning‐based approach and confirmed the relationship between distinctive features and the negative symptoms subdomain. These findings may improve the identification of potential neuroimaging signatures and improve the clinical assessment of the deficit syndrome.