Cargando…

The Effect of Intracochlear and Intratympanic Dexamethasone on Cochlear Implant Impedance

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the impact of different local corticosteroid applications on impedance measurements in patients with cochlear implants. METHODS: The study was designed as a controlled, randomized, and prospective study in which 34 consecutive patients who had undergone cochlear im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ardıç, Fazıl Necdet, Aydemir, Gökçe, Tümkaya, Funda, Altınöz, Ece, Şenol, Hande
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020414
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tao.2023.2023-6-4
_version_ 1785136124730015744
author Ardıç, Fazıl Necdet
Aydemir, Gökçe
Tümkaya, Funda
Altınöz, Ece
Şenol, Hande
author_facet Ardıç, Fazıl Necdet
Aydemir, Gökçe
Tümkaya, Funda
Altınöz, Ece
Şenol, Hande
author_sort Ardıç, Fazıl Necdet
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the impact of different local corticosteroid applications on impedance measurements in patients with cochlear implants. METHODS: The study was designed as a controlled, randomized, and prospective study in which 34 consecutive patients who had undergone cochlear implant surgery were divided into three groups. The first group received intracochlear dexamethasone, in the second group the middle ear cavity was filled with dexamethasone, and the third group did not receive dexamethasone. Intraoperative, postoperative 1(st) week, 1(st) month, 3(rd) month, 6(th)-month neural response telemetry, and impedances were measured. The measurements were compared by electrode groups representing the different regions of cochlea like basal (1–7), middle (8–13), and apical (14–22) regions. RESULTS: The intergroup analysis showed no statistically significant differences in impedance measurements of the basal, middle, and apical regions (p>0.05). However, the impedances were lower in the two dexamethasone groups, especially in the basal and middle parts. Sixth month impedances were also lower in the dexamethasone groups. There was apparent stability in the impedance of the basal region with the intracochlear application during the first week. CONCLUSION: Local dexamethasone applications had a potentially positive impact on the impedance of the basal and middle regions. Patients had lower impedances than the control group during follow-up and at the endpoint. The increase in the apical region may indicate that dexamethasone was not reaching the apical zone in local applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10652048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106520482023-09-01 The Effect of Intracochlear and Intratympanic Dexamethasone on Cochlear Implant Impedance Ardıç, Fazıl Necdet Aydemir, Gökçe Tümkaya, Funda Altınöz, Ece Şenol, Hande Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the impact of different local corticosteroid applications on impedance measurements in patients with cochlear implants. METHODS: The study was designed as a controlled, randomized, and prospective study in which 34 consecutive patients who had undergone cochlear implant surgery were divided into three groups. The first group received intracochlear dexamethasone, in the second group the middle ear cavity was filled with dexamethasone, and the third group did not receive dexamethasone. Intraoperative, postoperative 1(st) week, 1(st) month, 3(rd) month, 6(th)-month neural response telemetry, and impedances were measured. The measurements were compared by electrode groups representing the different regions of cochlea like basal (1–7), middle (8–13), and apical (14–22) regions. RESULTS: The intergroup analysis showed no statistically significant differences in impedance measurements of the basal, middle, and apical regions (p>0.05). However, the impedances were lower in the two dexamethasone groups, especially in the basal and middle parts. Sixth month impedances were also lower in the dexamethasone groups. There was apparent stability in the impedance of the basal region with the intracochlear application during the first week. CONCLUSION: Local dexamethasone applications had a potentially positive impact on the impedance of the basal and middle regions. Patients had lower impedances than the control group during follow-up and at the endpoint. The increase in the apical region may indicate that dexamethasone was not reaching the apical zone in local applications. Galenos Publishing 2023-09 2023-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10652048/ /pubmed/38020414 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tao.2023.2023-6-4 Text en ©Copyright 2023 by Turkish Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Society / Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology is published by Galenos Publishing House https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Licenced under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Ardıç, Fazıl Necdet
Aydemir, Gökçe
Tümkaya, Funda
Altınöz, Ece
Şenol, Hande
The Effect of Intracochlear and Intratympanic Dexamethasone on Cochlear Implant Impedance
title The Effect of Intracochlear and Intratympanic Dexamethasone on Cochlear Implant Impedance
title_full The Effect of Intracochlear and Intratympanic Dexamethasone on Cochlear Implant Impedance
title_fullStr The Effect of Intracochlear and Intratympanic Dexamethasone on Cochlear Implant Impedance
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Intracochlear and Intratympanic Dexamethasone on Cochlear Implant Impedance
title_short The Effect of Intracochlear and Intratympanic Dexamethasone on Cochlear Implant Impedance
title_sort effect of intracochlear and intratympanic dexamethasone on cochlear implant impedance
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020414
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tao.2023.2023-6-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ardıcfazılnecdet theeffectofintracochlearandintratympanicdexamethasoneoncochlearimplantimpedance
AT aydemirgokce theeffectofintracochlearandintratympanicdexamethasoneoncochlearimplantimpedance
AT tumkayafunda theeffectofintracochlearandintratympanicdexamethasoneoncochlearimplantimpedance
AT altınozece theeffectofintracochlearandintratympanicdexamethasoneoncochlearimplantimpedance
AT senolhande theeffectofintracochlearandintratympanicdexamethasoneoncochlearimplantimpedance
AT ardıcfazılnecdet effectofintracochlearandintratympanicdexamethasoneoncochlearimplantimpedance
AT aydemirgokce effectofintracochlearandintratympanicdexamethasoneoncochlearimplantimpedance
AT tumkayafunda effectofintracochlearandintratympanicdexamethasoneoncochlearimplantimpedance
AT altınozece effectofintracochlearandintratympanicdexamethasoneoncochlearimplantimpedance
AT senolhande effectofintracochlearandintratympanicdexamethasoneoncochlearimplantimpedance