Cargando…
Robotic world models—conceptualization, review, and engineering best practices
The term “world model” (WM) has surfaced several times in robotics, for instance, in the context of mobile manipulation, navigation and mapping, and deep reinforcement learning. Despite its frequent use, the term does not appear to have a concise definition that is consistently used across domains a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023585 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1253049 |
_version_ | 1785136174601338880 |
---|---|
author | Sakagami, Ryo Lay, Florian S. Dömel, Andreas Schuster, Martin J. Albu-Schäffer, Alin Stulp, Freek |
author_facet | Sakagami, Ryo Lay, Florian S. Dömel, Andreas Schuster, Martin J. Albu-Schäffer, Alin Stulp, Freek |
author_sort | Sakagami, Ryo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The term “world model” (WM) has surfaced several times in robotics, for instance, in the context of mobile manipulation, navigation and mapping, and deep reinforcement learning. Despite its frequent use, the term does not appear to have a concise definition that is consistently used across domains and research fields. In this review article, we bootstrap a terminology for WMs, describe important design dimensions found in robotic WMs, and use them to analyze the literature on WMs in robotics, which spans four decades. Throughout, we motivate the need for WMs by using principles from software engineering, including “Design for use,” “Do not repeat yourself,” and “Low coupling, high cohesion.” Concrete design guidelines are proposed for the future development and implementation of WMs. Finally, we highlight similarities and differences between the use of the term “world model” in robotic mobile manipulation and deep reinforcement learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10652279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106522792023-11-02 Robotic world models—conceptualization, review, and engineering best practices Sakagami, Ryo Lay, Florian S. Dömel, Andreas Schuster, Martin J. Albu-Schäffer, Alin Stulp, Freek Front Robot AI Robotics and AI The term “world model” (WM) has surfaced several times in robotics, for instance, in the context of mobile manipulation, navigation and mapping, and deep reinforcement learning. Despite its frequent use, the term does not appear to have a concise definition that is consistently used across domains and research fields. In this review article, we bootstrap a terminology for WMs, describe important design dimensions found in robotic WMs, and use them to analyze the literature on WMs in robotics, which spans four decades. Throughout, we motivate the need for WMs by using principles from software engineering, including “Design for use,” “Do not repeat yourself,” and “Low coupling, high cohesion.” Concrete design guidelines are proposed for the future development and implementation of WMs. Finally, we highlight similarities and differences between the use of the term “world model” in robotic mobile manipulation and deep reinforcement learning. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10652279/ /pubmed/38023585 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1253049 Text en Copyright © 2023 Sakagami, Lay, Dömel, Schuster, Albu-Schäffer and Stulp. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Robotics and AI Sakagami, Ryo Lay, Florian S. Dömel, Andreas Schuster, Martin J. Albu-Schäffer, Alin Stulp, Freek Robotic world models—conceptualization, review, and engineering best practices |
title | Robotic world models—conceptualization, review, and engineering best practices |
title_full | Robotic world models—conceptualization, review, and engineering best practices |
title_fullStr | Robotic world models—conceptualization, review, and engineering best practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic world models—conceptualization, review, and engineering best practices |
title_short | Robotic world models—conceptualization, review, and engineering best practices |
title_sort | robotic world models—conceptualization, review, and engineering best practices |
topic | Robotics and AI |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023585 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1253049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sakagamiryo roboticworldmodelsconceptualizationreviewandengineeringbestpractices AT layflorians roboticworldmodelsconceptualizationreviewandengineeringbestpractices AT domelandreas roboticworldmodelsconceptualizationreviewandengineeringbestpractices AT schustermartinj roboticworldmodelsconceptualizationreviewandengineeringbestpractices AT albuschafferalin roboticworldmodelsconceptualizationreviewandengineeringbestpractices AT stulpfreek roboticworldmodelsconceptualizationreviewandengineeringbestpractices |