Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim biosimilar MD‐110 in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy: Single‐arm phase III

INTRODUCTION: Pegfilgrastim is indicated to decrease the incidence of chemotherapy‐induced febrile neutropenia. It is the first granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor approved for prophylactic use regardless of carcinoma type and is marketed in Japan as G‐LASTA (Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takano, Toshimi, Ito, Mitsuya, Kadoya, Takayuki, Osako, Tomofumi, Aruga, Tomoyuki, Masuda, Norikazu, Miyaki, Toshiko, Niikura, Naoki, Shimizu, Daisuke, Yokoyama, Yuichi, Watanabe, Manabu, Tomomitsu, Masato, Aogi, Kenjiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37824431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6519
_version_ 1785136187921399808
author Takano, Toshimi
Ito, Mitsuya
Kadoya, Takayuki
Osako, Tomofumi
Aruga, Tomoyuki
Masuda, Norikazu
Miyaki, Toshiko
Niikura, Naoki
Shimizu, Daisuke
Yokoyama, Yuichi
Watanabe, Manabu
Tomomitsu, Masato
Aogi, Kenjiro
author_facet Takano, Toshimi
Ito, Mitsuya
Kadoya, Takayuki
Osako, Tomofumi
Aruga, Tomoyuki
Masuda, Norikazu
Miyaki, Toshiko
Niikura, Naoki
Shimizu, Daisuke
Yokoyama, Yuichi
Watanabe, Manabu
Tomomitsu, Masato
Aogi, Kenjiro
author_sort Takano, Toshimi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pegfilgrastim is indicated to decrease the incidence of chemotherapy‐induced febrile neutropenia. It is the first granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor approved for prophylactic use regardless of carcinoma type and is marketed in Japan as G‐LASTA (Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). MD‐110 is a biosimilar of pegfilgrastim. This phase III, multicenter, open‐label, single‐arm study investigated the efficacy and safety of MD‐110 in early‐stage breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant myelosuppressive chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 101 patients received the study drug. Each patient received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) (TC) for four cycles on day 1 of each cycle. MD‐110 (3.6 mg) was administered subcutaneously on day 2 of each cycle. The primary efficacy endpoint was the duration of severe neutropenia during cycle 1 (days with absolute neutrophil count < 500/mm(3)). The safety endpoints were adverse events and the presence of antidrug antibodies. RESULTS: The mean (SD) duration of severe neutropenia for MD‐110 was 0.2 (0.4) days. The upper limit of the two‐sided 95% confidence interval for the mean duration of severe neutropenia was 0.2 days, below the predefined threshold of 3.0 days. The incidence of febrile neutropenia, the secondary efficacy endpoint, was 6.9% (7/101). Adverse events, occurring in more than 50% of patients, were alopecia, constipation, and malaise, which are common side effects of TC chemotherapy. Antidrug antibodies were negative in all patients. CONCLUSION: MD‐110 was effective against chemotherapy‐induced neutropenia. No additional safety concern, compared with the originator, was observed in patients with breast cancer receiving TC chemotherapy.(JapicCTI‐205230).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10652341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106523412023-10-12 Efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim biosimilar MD‐110 in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy: Single‐arm phase III Takano, Toshimi Ito, Mitsuya Kadoya, Takayuki Osako, Tomofumi Aruga, Tomoyuki Masuda, Norikazu Miyaki, Toshiko Niikura, Naoki Shimizu, Daisuke Yokoyama, Yuichi Watanabe, Manabu Tomomitsu, Masato Aogi, Kenjiro Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES INTRODUCTION: Pegfilgrastim is indicated to decrease the incidence of chemotherapy‐induced febrile neutropenia. It is the first granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor approved for prophylactic use regardless of carcinoma type and is marketed in Japan as G‐LASTA (Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). MD‐110 is a biosimilar of pegfilgrastim. This phase III, multicenter, open‐label, single‐arm study investigated the efficacy and safety of MD‐110 in early‐stage breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant myelosuppressive chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 101 patients received the study drug. Each patient received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) (TC) for four cycles on day 1 of each cycle. MD‐110 (3.6 mg) was administered subcutaneously on day 2 of each cycle. The primary efficacy endpoint was the duration of severe neutropenia during cycle 1 (days with absolute neutrophil count < 500/mm(3)). The safety endpoints were adverse events and the presence of antidrug antibodies. RESULTS: The mean (SD) duration of severe neutropenia for MD‐110 was 0.2 (0.4) days. The upper limit of the two‐sided 95% confidence interval for the mean duration of severe neutropenia was 0.2 days, below the predefined threshold of 3.0 days. The incidence of febrile neutropenia, the secondary efficacy endpoint, was 6.9% (7/101). Adverse events, occurring in more than 50% of patients, were alopecia, constipation, and malaise, which are common side effects of TC chemotherapy. Antidrug antibodies were negative in all patients. CONCLUSION: MD‐110 was effective against chemotherapy‐induced neutropenia. No additional safety concern, compared with the originator, was observed in patients with breast cancer receiving TC chemotherapy.(JapicCTI‐205230). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10652341/ /pubmed/37824431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6519 Text en © 2023 Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Takano, Toshimi
Ito, Mitsuya
Kadoya, Takayuki
Osako, Tomofumi
Aruga, Tomoyuki
Masuda, Norikazu
Miyaki, Toshiko
Niikura, Naoki
Shimizu, Daisuke
Yokoyama, Yuichi
Watanabe, Manabu
Tomomitsu, Masato
Aogi, Kenjiro
Efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim biosimilar MD‐110 in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy: Single‐arm phase III
title Efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim biosimilar MD‐110 in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy: Single‐arm phase III
title_full Efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim biosimilar MD‐110 in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy: Single‐arm phase III
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim biosimilar MD‐110 in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy: Single‐arm phase III
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim biosimilar MD‐110 in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy: Single‐arm phase III
title_short Efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim biosimilar MD‐110 in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy: Single‐arm phase III
title_sort efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim biosimilar md‐110 in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy: single‐arm phase iii
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37824431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6519
work_keys_str_mv AT takanotoshimi efficacyandsafetyofpegfilgrastimbiosimilarmd110inpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingchemotherapysinglearmphaseiii
AT itomitsuya efficacyandsafetyofpegfilgrastimbiosimilarmd110inpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingchemotherapysinglearmphaseiii
AT kadoyatakayuki efficacyandsafetyofpegfilgrastimbiosimilarmd110inpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingchemotherapysinglearmphaseiii
AT osakotomofumi efficacyandsafetyofpegfilgrastimbiosimilarmd110inpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingchemotherapysinglearmphaseiii
AT arugatomoyuki efficacyandsafetyofpegfilgrastimbiosimilarmd110inpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingchemotherapysinglearmphaseiii
AT masudanorikazu efficacyandsafetyofpegfilgrastimbiosimilarmd110inpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingchemotherapysinglearmphaseiii
AT miyakitoshiko efficacyandsafetyofpegfilgrastimbiosimilarmd110inpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingchemotherapysinglearmphaseiii
AT niikuranaoki efficacyandsafetyofpegfilgrastimbiosimilarmd110inpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingchemotherapysinglearmphaseiii
AT shimizudaisuke efficacyandsafetyofpegfilgrastimbiosimilarmd110inpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingchemotherapysinglearmphaseiii
AT yokoyamayuichi efficacyandsafetyofpegfilgrastimbiosimilarmd110inpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingchemotherapysinglearmphaseiii
AT watanabemanabu efficacyandsafetyofpegfilgrastimbiosimilarmd110inpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingchemotherapysinglearmphaseiii
AT tomomitsumasato efficacyandsafetyofpegfilgrastimbiosimilarmd110inpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingchemotherapysinglearmphaseiii
AT aogikenjiro efficacyandsafetyofpegfilgrastimbiosimilarmd110inpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingchemotherapysinglearmphaseiii