Cargando…
Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of Fumokomp (SF‐009) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product
The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to evaluate the safety of the smoke flavouring Primary Product Fumokomp (SF‐009), for which a renewal application was submitted in accordance with Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2065/2003 (in the renewal application the Primar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38027436 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8370 |
_version_ | 1785147731982942208 |
---|---|
author | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul J Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Boon, Polly Bolognesi, Claudia Cordelli, Eugenia Chipman, Kevin Sahlin, Ullrika Carfì, Maria Carnesecchi, Edoardo Martino, Carla Multari, Salvatore Palaniappan, Vasantha Tard, Alexandra Mennes, Wim |
author_facet | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul J Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Boon, Polly Bolognesi, Claudia Cordelli, Eugenia Chipman, Kevin Sahlin, Ullrika Carfì, Maria Carnesecchi, Edoardo Martino, Carla Multari, Salvatore Palaniappan, Vasantha Tard, Alexandra Mennes, Wim |
collection | PubMed |
description | The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to evaluate the safety of the smoke flavouring Primary Product Fumokomp (SF‐009), for which a renewal application was submitted in accordance with Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2065/2003 (in the renewal application the Primary Product is reported as ‘Fumokomp Conc.’). This opinion refers to an assessment of data submitted on chemical characterisation, dietary exposure and genotoxicity of the Primary Product. Fumokomp Conc. is produced by pyrolysis of beech and hornbeam woods. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) was applied for both identification and quantification of the volatile constituents of the Primary Product. Given the limitations of the method, the Panel cannot judge with confidence whether the applied method meets the legal quality criterion that at least 80% of the volatile fraction shall be identified and quantified. Moreover, the Panel concluded that the absence of furan‐2(5H)‐one from the Primary Product was not convincingly demonstrated. At the maximum proposed use levels, dietary exposure estimates calculated with FAIM ranged from 0.04 to 0.9 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day at the mean and from 0.1 to 1.5 mg/kg bw per day at the 95th percentile. The information available on the 32 identified components of the Primary Product, although limited, did not indicate a concern for genotoxicity for any of these substances. However, whole mixture testing in an in vitro mouse lymphoma assay gave positive results which would require an adequate in vivo follow‐up study. In addition, the potential for aneugenicity of the Primary Product has not been adequately investigated. Accordingly, the potential safety concern for genotoxicity of the Primary Product cannot be ruled out. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10652694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106526942023-11-16 Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of Fumokomp (SF‐009) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul J Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Boon, Polly Bolognesi, Claudia Cordelli, Eugenia Chipman, Kevin Sahlin, Ullrika Carfì, Maria Carnesecchi, Edoardo Martino, Carla Multari, Salvatore Palaniappan, Vasantha Tard, Alexandra Mennes, Wim EFSA J Scientific Opinion The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to evaluate the safety of the smoke flavouring Primary Product Fumokomp (SF‐009), for which a renewal application was submitted in accordance with Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2065/2003 (in the renewal application the Primary Product is reported as ‘Fumokomp Conc.’). This opinion refers to an assessment of data submitted on chemical characterisation, dietary exposure and genotoxicity of the Primary Product. Fumokomp Conc. is produced by pyrolysis of beech and hornbeam woods. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) was applied for both identification and quantification of the volatile constituents of the Primary Product. Given the limitations of the method, the Panel cannot judge with confidence whether the applied method meets the legal quality criterion that at least 80% of the volatile fraction shall be identified and quantified. Moreover, the Panel concluded that the absence of furan‐2(5H)‐one from the Primary Product was not convincingly demonstrated. At the maximum proposed use levels, dietary exposure estimates calculated with FAIM ranged from 0.04 to 0.9 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day at the mean and from 0.1 to 1.5 mg/kg bw per day at the 95th percentile. The information available on the 32 identified components of the Primary Product, although limited, did not indicate a concern for genotoxicity for any of these substances. However, whole mixture testing in an in vitro mouse lymphoma assay gave positive results which would require an adequate in vivo follow‐up study. In addition, the potential for aneugenicity of the Primary Product has not been adequately investigated. Accordingly, the potential safety concern for genotoxicity of the Primary Product cannot be ruled out. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10652694/ /pubmed/38027436 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8370 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul J Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Boon, Polly Bolognesi, Claudia Cordelli, Eugenia Chipman, Kevin Sahlin, Ullrika Carfì, Maria Carnesecchi, Edoardo Martino, Carla Multari, Salvatore Palaniappan, Vasantha Tard, Alexandra Mennes, Wim Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of Fumokomp (SF‐009) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product |
title | Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of Fumokomp (SF‐009) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product |
title_full | Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of Fumokomp (SF‐009) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product |
title_fullStr | Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of Fumokomp (SF‐009) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of Fumokomp (SF‐009) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product |
title_short | Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of Fumokomp (SF‐009) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product |
title_sort | scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of fumokomp (sf‐009) as a smoke flavouring primary product |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38027436 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8370 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT younesmaged scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT aquilinagabriele scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT castlelaurence scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT degengisela scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT engelkarlheinz scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT fowlerpaulj scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT frutosfernandezmariajose scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT furstpeter scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT gundertremyursula scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT gurtlerrainer scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT husøytrine scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT mancomelania scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT moldeuspeter scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT passamontisabina scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT shahromina scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT waalkensberendsenine scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT wrightmatthew scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT benigniromualdo scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT boonpolly scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT bolognesiclaudia scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT cordellieugenia scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT chipmankevin scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT sahlinullrika scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT carfimaria scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT carnesecchiedoardo scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT martinocarla scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT multarisalvatore scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT palaniappanvasantha scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT tardalexandra scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT menneswim scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationoffumokompsf009asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct |