Cargando…
Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of proFagus Smoke R709 (SF‐008) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product
The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to evaluate the safety of the smoke flavouring Primary Product proFagus Smoke R709 (SF‐008), for which a renewal application was submitted in accordance with Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2065/2003. This opinion refers to the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38027454 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8369 |
_version_ | 1785147732503035904 |
---|---|
author | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul J Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Boon, Polly Bolognesi, Claudia Cordelli, Eugenia Chipman, Kevin Degen, Gisela Sahlin, Ullrika Carfì, Maria Martino, Carla Mech, Agnieszka Multari, Salvatore Palaniappan, Vasantha Tard, Alexandra Mennes, Wim |
author_facet | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul J Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Boon, Polly Bolognesi, Claudia Cordelli, Eugenia Chipman, Kevin Degen, Gisela Sahlin, Ullrika Carfì, Maria Martino, Carla Mech, Agnieszka Multari, Salvatore Palaniappan, Vasantha Tard, Alexandra Mennes, Wim |
collection | PubMed |
description | The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to evaluate the safety of the smoke flavouring Primary Product proFagus Smoke R709 (SF‐008), for which a renewal application was submitted in accordance with Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2065/2003. This opinion refers to the assessment of data submitted on chemical characterisation, dietary exposure and genotoxicity of the Primary Product. ProFagus Smoke R709 is obtained by pyrolysis of beech and oak wood as main source materials. The panel concluded that the compositional data provided on the Primary Product are adequate. At the maximum proposed use levels, dietary exposure estimates calculated with DietEx ranged from 0.8 to 12.2 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day at the mean and from 2.3 to 51.4 mg/kg bw per day at the 95th percentile. The Panel concluded that three components in the Primary Product raise a potential concern for genotoxicity. In addition, a potential concern for genotoxicity was identified for the unidentified part of the mixture. The Primary Product contains furan‐2(5H)‐one, for which a concern for genotoxicity was identified in vivo upon oral administration. Considering that the exposure estimates for this component are above the TTC of 0.0025 μg/kg bw per day for DNA‐reactive mutagens and/or carcinogens, the panel concluded that the Primary Product raises concern with respect to genotoxicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10652699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106526992023-11-16 Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of proFagus Smoke R709 (SF‐008) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul J Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Boon, Polly Bolognesi, Claudia Cordelli, Eugenia Chipman, Kevin Degen, Gisela Sahlin, Ullrika Carfì, Maria Martino, Carla Mech, Agnieszka Multari, Salvatore Palaniappan, Vasantha Tard, Alexandra Mennes, Wim EFSA J Scientific Opinion The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) was requested to evaluate the safety of the smoke flavouring Primary Product proFagus Smoke R709 (SF‐008), for which a renewal application was submitted in accordance with Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2065/2003. This opinion refers to the assessment of data submitted on chemical characterisation, dietary exposure and genotoxicity of the Primary Product. ProFagus Smoke R709 is obtained by pyrolysis of beech and oak wood as main source materials. The panel concluded that the compositional data provided on the Primary Product are adequate. At the maximum proposed use levels, dietary exposure estimates calculated with DietEx ranged from 0.8 to 12.2 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day at the mean and from 2.3 to 51.4 mg/kg bw per day at the 95th percentile. The Panel concluded that three components in the Primary Product raise a potential concern for genotoxicity. In addition, a potential concern for genotoxicity was identified for the unidentified part of the mixture. The Primary Product contains furan‐2(5H)‐one, for which a concern for genotoxicity was identified in vivo upon oral administration. Considering that the exposure estimates for this component are above the TTC of 0.0025 μg/kg bw per day for DNA‐reactive mutagens and/or carcinogens, the panel concluded that the Primary Product raises concern with respect to genotoxicity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10652699/ /pubmed/38027454 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8369 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Degen, Gisela Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul J Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wright, Matthew Benigni, Romualdo Boon, Polly Bolognesi, Claudia Cordelli, Eugenia Chipman, Kevin Degen, Gisela Sahlin, Ullrika Carfì, Maria Martino, Carla Mech, Agnieszka Multari, Salvatore Palaniappan, Vasantha Tard, Alexandra Mennes, Wim Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of proFagus Smoke R709 (SF‐008) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product |
title | Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of proFagus Smoke R709 (SF‐008) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product |
title_full | Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of proFagus Smoke R709 (SF‐008) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product |
title_fullStr | Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of proFagus Smoke R709 (SF‐008) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of proFagus Smoke R709 (SF‐008) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product |
title_short | Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of proFagus Smoke R709 (SF‐008) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product |
title_sort | scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of profagus smoke r709 (sf‐008) as a smoke flavouring primary product |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38027454 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8369 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT younesmaged scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT aquilinagabriele scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT castlelaurence scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT degengisela scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT engelkarlheinz scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT fowlerpaulj scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT frutosfernandezmariajose scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT furstpeter scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT gundertremyursula scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT gurtlerrainer scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT husøytrine scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT mancomelania scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT moldeuspeter scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT passamontisabina scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT shahromina scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT waalkensberendsenine scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT wrightmatthew scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT benigniromualdo scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT boonpolly scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT bolognesiclaudia scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT cordellieugenia scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT chipmankevin scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT degengisela scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT sahlinullrika scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT carfimaria scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT martinocarla scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT mechagnieszka scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT multarisalvatore scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT palaniappanvasantha scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT tardalexandra scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct AT menneswim scientificopinionontherenewaloftheauthorisationofprofagussmoker709sf008asasmokeflavouringprimaryproduct |