Cargando…
Engaging interested parties to optimize wildfire smoke communication in Canada: challenges with initiating change
BACKGROUND: In February 2022, an online Wildfire Smoke Communication Workshop series identified priorities and strategies to improve wildfire smoke communication in Canada. We evaluated the engagement methods, the workshop series and workshop summary report, to determine if participants/organization...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38026430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268249 |
_version_ | 1785136282542800896 |
---|---|
author | Choy, Amelia Shellington, Erin M. Rideout, Karen Roushorne, Meghan Joshi, Phalgun Carlsten, Christopher |
author_facet | Choy, Amelia Shellington, Erin M. Rideout, Karen Roushorne, Meghan Joshi, Phalgun Carlsten, Christopher |
author_sort | Choy, Amelia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In February 2022, an online Wildfire Smoke Communication Workshop series identified priorities and strategies to improve wildfire smoke communication in Canada. We evaluated the engagement methods, the workshop series and workshop summary report, to determine if participants/organizations initiated changes identified in the workshop to optimize wildfire smoke communication plans. METHODS: Three evaluation surveys were developed using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework dimensions and PRISM (Practical, Robust, Implementation, and Sustainability Model) contextual domains to measure the engagement impact. Surveys 1, 2, and 3 were disseminated to workshop participants between February 2022 (post-workshop series), May 2022 (pre-wildfire season), and September 2022 (post-wildfire season). Likert survey responses were analyzed descriptively using means and standard deviations. Open-ended written responses were analyzed using deductive reasoning and response proportions. RESULTS: Of 69 workshop participants, 28, 19, and 13 responded to surveys 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Workshop participation helped survey 1 respondents consider optimizing wildfire smoke communication (M = 3.93, SD = 0.88). Workshop participation and the summary report helped survey 2 respondents consider new actions to optimize wildfire smoke communication (M = 3.84, SD = 0.74). The most intended action in survey 2 (68%, n = 13) and the most common action taken in survey 3 (62%, n = 8) was to simplify message content. The primary limitation to optimization was capacity. CONCLUSION: The engagement methods, particularly the summary report, were beneficial for organizations to take action to optimize wildfire smoke communication in Canada. Future engagement methods should examine persisting system-level issues and capacity limitations as they undermine the ability to optimize wildfire smoke communication in Canada. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10652752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106527522023-11-02 Engaging interested parties to optimize wildfire smoke communication in Canada: challenges with initiating change Choy, Amelia Shellington, Erin M. Rideout, Karen Roushorne, Meghan Joshi, Phalgun Carlsten, Christopher Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: In February 2022, an online Wildfire Smoke Communication Workshop series identified priorities and strategies to improve wildfire smoke communication in Canada. We evaluated the engagement methods, the workshop series and workshop summary report, to determine if participants/organizations initiated changes identified in the workshop to optimize wildfire smoke communication plans. METHODS: Three evaluation surveys were developed using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework dimensions and PRISM (Practical, Robust, Implementation, and Sustainability Model) contextual domains to measure the engagement impact. Surveys 1, 2, and 3 were disseminated to workshop participants between February 2022 (post-workshop series), May 2022 (pre-wildfire season), and September 2022 (post-wildfire season). Likert survey responses were analyzed descriptively using means and standard deviations. Open-ended written responses were analyzed using deductive reasoning and response proportions. RESULTS: Of 69 workshop participants, 28, 19, and 13 responded to surveys 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Workshop participation helped survey 1 respondents consider optimizing wildfire smoke communication (M = 3.93, SD = 0.88). Workshop participation and the summary report helped survey 2 respondents consider new actions to optimize wildfire smoke communication (M = 3.84, SD = 0.74). The most intended action in survey 2 (68%, n = 13) and the most common action taken in survey 3 (62%, n = 8) was to simplify message content. The primary limitation to optimization was capacity. CONCLUSION: The engagement methods, particularly the summary report, were beneficial for organizations to take action to optimize wildfire smoke communication in Canada. Future engagement methods should examine persisting system-level issues and capacity limitations as they undermine the ability to optimize wildfire smoke communication in Canada. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10652752/ /pubmed/38026430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268249 Text en Copyright © 2023 Choy, Shellington, Rideout, Roushorne, Joshi and Carlsten. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Choy, Amelia Shellington, Erin M. Rideout, Karen Roushorne, Meghan Joshi, Phalgun Carlsten, Christopher Engaging interested parties to optimize wildfire smoke communication in Canada: challenges with initiating change |
title | Engaging interested parties to optimize wildfire smoke communication in Canada: challenges with initiating change |
title_full | Engaging interested parties to optimize wildfire smoke communication in Canada: challenges with initiating change |
title_fullStr | Engaging interested parties to optimize wildfire smoke communication in Canada: challenges with initiating change |
title_full_unstemmed | Engaging interested parties to optimize wildfire smoke communication in Canada: challenges with initiating change |
title_short | Engaging interested parties to optimize wildfire smoke communication in Canada: challenges with initiating change |
title_sort | engaging interested parties to optimize wildfire smoke communication in canada: challenges with initiating change |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38026430 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268249 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choyamelia engaginginterestedpartiestooptimizewildfiresmokecommunicationincanadachallengeswithinitiatingchange AT shellingtonerinm engaginginterestedpartiestooptimizewildfiresmokecommunicationincanadachallengeswithinitiatingchange AT rideoutkaren engaginginterestedpartiestooptimizewildfiresmokecommunicationincanadachallengeswithinitiatingchange AT roushornemeghan engaginginterestedpartiestooptimizewildfiresmokecommunicationincanadachallengeswithinitiatingchange AT joshiphalgun engaginginterestedpartiestooptimizewildfiresmokecommunicationincanadachallengeswithinitiatingchange AT carlstenchristopher engaginginterestedpartiestooptimizewildfiresmokecommunicationincanadachallengeswithinitiatingchange |