Cargando…
Incidence and risk factors for unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Unplanned readmissions (URs) after colorectal surgery (CRS) are common, expensive, and result from failure to progress in postoperative recovery. These are considered preventable, although the true extent is yet to be defined. In addition, their successful prediction remains elusive due...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10653493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37972100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293806 |
_version_ | 1785147789018136576 |
---|---|
author | D’Souza, Joel Richards, Simon Eglinton, Timothy Frizelle, Frank |
author_facet | D’Souza, Joel Richards, Simon Eglinton, Timothy Frizelle, Frank |
author_sort | D’Souza, Joel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Unplanned readmissions (URs) after colorectal surgery (CRS) are common, expensive, and result from failure to progress in postoperative recovery. These are considered preventable, although the true extent is yet to be defined. In addition, their successful prediction remains elusive due to significant heterogeneity in this field of research. This systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies aimed to identify the clinically relevant predictors of UR after colorectal surgery. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using indexed sources (The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, and Embase) to search for published studies in English between 1996 and 2022. The search strategy returned 625 studies for screening of which, 150 were duplicates, and 305 were excluded for irrelevance. An additional 150 studies were excluded based on methodology and definition criteria. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria and for the meta-analysis. Independent meta-extraction was conducted by multiple reviewers (JD & SR) in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was defined as UR within 30 days of index discharge after colorectal surgery. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. RESULTS: The reported 30-day UR rate ranged from 6% to 22.8%. Increased comorbidity was the strongest preoperative risk factor for UR (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.28–1.51). Stoma formation was the strongest operative risk factor (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.38–1.72). The occurrence of postoperative complications was the strongest postoperative and overall risk factor for UR (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.21–7.61). CONCLUSIONS: Increased comorbidity, stoma formation, and postoperative complications are clinically relevant predictors of UR after CRS. These risk factors are readily identifiable before discharge and serve as clinically relevant targets for readmission risk-reducing strategies. Successful readmission prediction may facilitate the efficient allocation of healthcare resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10653493 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106534932023-11-16 Incidence and risk factors for unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis D’Souza, Joel Richards, Simon Eglinton, Timothy Frizelle, Frank PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Unplanned readmissions (URs) after colorectal surgery (CRS) are common, expensive, and result from failure to progress in postoperative recovery. These are considered preventable, although the true extent is yet to be defined. In addition, their successful prediction remains elusive due to significant heterogeneity in this field of research. This systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies aimed to identify the clinically relevant predictors of UR after colorectal surgery. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using indexed sources (The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, and Embase) to search for published studies in English between 1996 and 2022. The search strategy returned 625 studies for screening of which, 150 were duplicates, and 305 were excluded for irrelevance. An additional 150 studies were excluded based on methodology and definition criteria. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria and for the meta-analysis. Independent meta-extraction was conducted by multiple reviewers (JD & SR) in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome was defined as UR within 30 days of index discharge after colorectal surgery. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. RESULTS: The reported 30-day UR rate ranged from 6% to 22.8%. Increased comorbidity was the strongest preoperative risk factor for UR (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.28–1.51). Stoma formation was the strongest operative risk factor (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.38–1.72). The occurrence of postoperative complications was the strongest postoperative and overall risk factor for UR (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.21–7.61). CONCLUSIONS: Increased comorbidity, stoma formation, and postoperative complications are clinically relevant predictors of UR after CRS. These risk factors are readily identifiable before discharge and serve as clinically relevant targets for readmission risk-reducing strategies. Successful readmission prediction may facilitate the efficient allocation of healthcare resources. Public Library of Science 2023-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10653493/ /pubmed/37972100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293806 Text en © 2023 D’Souza et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article D’Souza, Joel Richards, Simon Eglinton, Timothy Frizelle, Frank Incidence and risk factors for unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis |
title | Incidence and risk factors for unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Incidence and risk factors for unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Incidence and risk factors for unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidence and risk factors for unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Incidence and risk factors for unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | incidence and risk factors for unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10653493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37972100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293806 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dsouzajoel incidenceandriskfactorsforunplannedreadmissionaftercolorectalsurgeryametaanalysis AT richardssimon incidenceandriskfactorsforunplannedreadmissionaftercolorectalsurgeryametaanalysis AT eglintontimothy incidenceandriskfactorsforunplannedreadmissionaftercolorectalsurgeryametaanalysis AT frizellefrank incidenceandriskfactorsforunplannedreadmissionaftercolorectalsurgeryametaanalysis |