Cargando…

Success Rate of Buccal Fat Pad Removal in Cases of Previous Injection Lipolysis of the Cheeks: A Comparative Analysis

BACKGROUND: Although buccal fat pad removal for facial slimming has a high success rate, fibrosis in patients with a history of cheek injection lipolysis may pose challenges. Therefore, we evaluated the success rate and procedure-related complications of buccal fat pad removal in patients with a his...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sirimahachaiyakul, Pornthep, Tansawet, Amarit, Wannachamras, Saran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10653592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38025637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005410
_version_ 1785147807058886656
author Sirimahachaiyakul, Pornthep
Tansawet, Amarit
Wannachamras, Saran
author_facet Sirimahachaiyakul, Pornthep
Tansawet, Amarit
Wannachamras, Saran
author_sort Sirimahachaiyakul, Pornthep
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although buccal fat pad removal for facial slimming has a high success rate, fibrosis in patients with a history of cheek injection lipolysis may pose challenges. Therefore, we evaluated the success rate and procedure-related complications of buccal fat pad removal in patients with a history of cheek injection lipolysis. METHODS: Patients who underwent buccal fat pad removal between September 2016 and February 2020 were categorized according to a history of lipolysis (injection lipolysis group versus control group). The primary and secondary outcomes were the success rate of buccal fat pad removal and the incidence of procedure-related complications, respectively. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 100 patients (14 men; 86 women; mean age, 27.49 ± 6.26 years; mean follow-up duration, 7.41 months), with 61 patients (nine men; 52 women) in the injection lipolysis group and 39 patients (five men; 34 women) in the control group. The mean buccal fat pad weight did not differ significantly between the two groups. However, the success rate was 91.8% (56/61 patients) and 100% (39/39 patients) in the injection lipolysis and control groups, respectively. Complications were exclusively observed in the injection lipolysis group [8/122 cheeks (6.6%); control group, 0/78 cheeks (0%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Buccal fat pad removal effectively enhances the aesthetic appearance of the lower face. However, in patients with a history of cheek injection lipolysis, the success rate of buccal fat pad removal is lower, and the incidence of complications is significantly higher. Consequently, caution should be exercised when performing this procedure in specific patient populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10653592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106535922023-11-16 Success Rate of Buccal Fat Pad Removal in Cases of Previous Injection Lipolysis of the Cheeks: A Comparative Analysis Sirimahachaiyakul, Pornthep Tansawet, Amarit Wannachamras, Saran Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Cosmetic BACKGROUND: Although buccal fat pad removal for facial slimming has a high success rate, fibrosis in patients with a history of cheek injection lipolysis may pose challenges. Therefore, we evaluated the success rate and procedure-related complications of buccal fat pad removal in patients with a history of cheek injection lipolysis. METHODS: Patients who underwent buccal fat pad removal between September 2016 and February 2020 were categorized according to a history of lipolysis (injection lipolysis group versus control group). The primary and secondary outcomes were the success rate of buccal fat pad removal and the incidence of procedure-related complications, respectively. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 100 patients (14 men; 86 women; mean age, 27.49 ± 6.26 years; mean follow-up duration, 7.41 months), with 61 patients (nine men; 52 women) in the injection lipolysis group and 39 patients (five men; 34 women) in the control group. The mean buccal fat pad weight did not differ significantly between the two groups. However, the success rate was 91.8% (56/61 patients) and 100% (39/39 patients) in the injection lipolysis and control groups, respectively. Complications were exclusively observed in the injection lipolysis group [8/122 cheeks (6.6%); control group, 0/78 cheeks (0%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Buccal fat pad removal effectively enhances the aesthetic appearance of the lower face. However, in patients with a history of cheek injection lipolysis, the success rate of buccal fat pad removal is lower, and the incidence of complications is significantly higher. Consequently, caution should be exercised when performing this procedure in specific patient populations. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10653592/ /pubmed/38025637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005410 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Cosmetic
Sirimahachaiyakul, Pornthep
Tansawet, Amarit
Wannachamras, Saran
Success Rate of Buccal Fat Pad Removal in Cases of Previous Injection Lipolysis of the Cheeks: A Comparative Analysis
title Success Rate of Buccal Fat Pad Removal in Cases of Previous Injection Lipolysis of the Cheeks: A Comparative Analysis
title_full Success Rate of Buccal Fat Pad Removal in Cases of Previous Injection Lipolysis of the Cheeks: A Comparative Analysis
title_fullStr Success Rate of Buccal Fat Pad Removal in Cases of Previous Injection Lipolysis of the Cheeks: A Comparative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Success Rate of Buccal Fat Pad Removal in Cases of Previous Injection Lipolysis of the Cheeks: A Comparative Analysis
title_short Success Rate of Buccal Fat Pad Removal in Cases of Previous Injection Lipolysis of the Cheeks: A Comparative Analysis
title_sort success rate of buccal fat pad removal in cases of previous injection lipolysis of the cheeks: a comparative analysis
topic Cosmetic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10653592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38025637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005410
work_keys_str_mv AT sirimahachaiyakulpornthep successrateofbuccalfatpadremovalincasesofpreviousinjectionlipolysisofthecheeksacomparativeanalysis
AT tansawetamarit successrateofbuccalfatpadremovalincasesofpreviousinjectionlipolysisofthecheeksacomparativeanalysis
AT wannachamrassaran successrateofbuccalfatpadremovalincasesofpreviousinjectionlipolysisofthecheeksacomparativeanalysis