Cargando…

Molecular classifications of prostate cancer: basis for individualized risk stratification and precision therapy

Tumour classifications play a pivotal role in prostate cancer (PCa) management. It can predict the clinical outcomes of PCa as early as the disease is diagnosed and then guide therapeutic schemes, such as active monitoring, standalone surgical intervention, or surgery supplemented with postoperative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ge, Qintao, Li, Jiawei, Yang, Feixiang, Tian, Xuefeng, Zhang, Meng, Hao, Zongyao, Liang, Chaozhao, Meng, Jialin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10653710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37939258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2279235
_version_ 1785136472723030016
author Ge, Qintao
Li, Jiawei
Yang, Feixiang
Tian, Xuefeng
Zhang, Meng
Hao, Zongyao
Liang, Chaozhao
Meng, Jialin
author_facet Ge, Qintao
Li, Jiawei
Yang, Feixiang
Tian, Xuefeng
Zhang, Meng
Hao, Zongyao
Liang, Chaozhao
Meng, Jialin
author_sort Ge, Qintao
collection PubMed
description Tumour classifications play a pivotal role in prostate cancer (PCa) management. It can predict the clinical outcomes of PCa as early as the disease is diagnosed and then guide therapeutic schemes, such as active monitoring, standalone surgical intervention, or surgery supplemented with postoperative adjunctive therapy, thereby circumventing disease exacerbation and excessive treatment. Classifications based on clinicopathological features, such as prostate cancer-specific antigen, Gleason score, and TNM stage, are still the main risk stratification strategies and have played an essential role in standardized clinical decision-making. However, mounting evidence indicates that clinicopathological parameters in isolation fail to adequately capture the heterogeneity exhibited among distinct PCa patients, such as those sharing identical Gleason scores yet experiencing divergent prognoses. As a remedy, molecular classifications have been introduced. Currently, molecular studies have revealed the characteristic genomic alterations, epigenetic modulations, and tumour microenvironment associated with different types of PCa, which provide a chance for urologists to refine the PCa classification. In this context, numerous invaluable molecular classifications have been devised, employing disparate statistical methodologies and algorithmic approaches, encompassing self-organizing map clustering, unsupervised cluster analysis, and multifarious algorithms. Interestingly, the classifier PAM50 was used in a phase-2 multicentre open-label trial, NRG-GU-006, for further validation, which hints at the promise of molecular classification for clinical use. Consequently, this review examines the extant molecular classifications, delineates the prevailing panorama of clinically pertinent molecular signatures, and delves into eight emblematic molecular classifications, dissecting their methodological underpinnings and clinical utility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10653710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106537102023-11-08 Molecular classifications of prostate cancer: basis for individualized risk stratification and precision therapy Ge, Qintao Li, Jiawei Yang, Feixiang Tian, Xuefeng Zhang, Meng Hao, Zongyao Liang, Chaozhao Meng, Jialin Ann Med Oncology Tumour classifications play a pivotal role in prostate cancer (PCa) management. It can predict the clinical outcomes of PCa as early as the disease is diagnosed and then guide therapeutic schemes, such as active monitoring, standalone surgical intervention, or surgery supplemented with postoperative adjunctive therapy, thereby circumventing disease exacerbation and excessive treatment. Classifications based on clinicopathological features, such as prostate cancer-specific antigen, Gleason score, and TNM stage, are still the main risk stratification strategies and have played an essential role in standardized clinical decision-making. However, mounting evidence indicates that clinicopathological parameters in isolation fail to adequately capture the heterogeneity exhibited among distinct PCa patients, such as those sharing identical Gleason scores yet experiencing divergent prognoses. As a remedy, molecular classifications have been introduced. Currently, molecular studies have revealed the characteristic genomic alterations, epigenetic modulations, and tumour microenvironment associated with different types of PCa, which provide a chance for urologists to refine the PCa classification. In this context, numerous invaluable molecular classifications have been devised, employing disparate statistical methodologies and algorithmic approaches, encompassing self-organizing map clustering, unsupervised cluster analysis, and multifarious algorithms. Interestingly, the classifier PAM50 was used in a phase-2 multicentre open-label trial, NRG-GU-006, for further validation, which hints at the promise of molecular classification for clinical use. Consequently, this review examines the extant molecular classifications, delineates the prevailing panorama of clinically pertinent molecular signatures, and delves into eight emblematic molecular classifications, dissecting their methodological underpinnings and clinical utility. Taylor & Francis 2023-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10653710/ /pubmed/37939258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2279235 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Oncology
Ge, Qintao
Li, Jiawei
Yang, Feixiang
Tian, Xuefeng
Zhang, Meng
Hao, Zongyao
Liang, Chaozhao
Meng, Jialin
Molecular classifications of prostate cancer: basis for individualized risk stratification and precision therapy
title Molecular classifications of prostate cancer: basis for individualized risk stratification and precision therapy
title_full Molecular classifications of prostate cancer: basis for individualized risk stratification and precision therapy
title_fullStr Molecular classifications of prostate cancer: basis for individualized risk stratification and precision therapy
title_full_unstemmed Molecular classifications of prostate cancer: basis for individualized risk stratification and precision therapy
title_short Molecular classifications of prostate cancer: basis for individualized risk stratification and precision therapy
title_sort molecular classifications of prostate cancer: basis for individualized risk stratification and precision therapy
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10653710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37939258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2279235
work_keys_str_mv AT geqintao molecularclassificationsofprostatecancerbasisforindividualizedriskstratificationandprecisiontherapy
AT lijiawei molecularclassificationsofprostatecancerbasisforindividualizedriskstratificationandprecisiontherapy
AT yangfeixiang molecularclassificationsofprostatecancerbasisforindividualizedriskstratificationandprecisiontherapy
AT tianxuefeng molecularclassificationsofprostatecancerbasisforindividualizedriskstratificationandprecisiontherapy
AT zhangmeng molecularclassificationsofprostatecancerbasisforindividualizedriskstratificationandprecisiontherapy
AT haozongyao molecularclassificationsofprostatecancerbasisforindividualizedriskstratificationandprecisiontherapy
AT liangchaozhao molecularclassificationsofprostatecancerbasisforindividualizedriskstratificationandprecisiontherapy
AT mengjialin molecularclassificationsofprostatecancerbasisforindividualizedriskstratificationandprecisiontherapy