Cargando…

Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes knowledge is associated with health, including lower A1C levels. The Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ-24), developed 30 years ago for Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes and since used with diverse samples in many countries, contains outdated items that no longer accurate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zuñiga, Julie A., Huang, Ya-Ching, Bang, So Hyeon, Cuevas, Heather, Hutson, Tara, Heitkemper, Elizabeth M., Cho, Emma, García, Alexandra A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38024222
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/ds22-0079
_version_ 1785136561146298368
author Zuñiga, Julie A.
Huang, Ya-Ching
Bang, So Hyeon
Cuevas, Heather
Hutson, Tara
Heitkemper, Elizabeth M.
Cho, Emma
García, Alexandra A.
author_facet Zuñiga, Julie A.
Huang, Ya-Ching
Bang, So Hyeon
Cuevas, Heather
Hutson, Tara
Heitkemper, Elizabeth M.
Cho, Emma
García, Alexandra A.
author_sort Zuñiga, Julie A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Diabetes knowledge is associated with health, including lower A1C levels. The Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ-24), developed 30 years ago for Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes and since used with diverse samples in many countries, contains outdated items that no longer accurately assess current knowledge needed for diabetes self-management. We revised the DKQ-24 and tested psychometric properties of the DKQ-Revised (DKQ-R) with a diverse sample. METHODS: We conducted a five-phase instrumentation study as follows: 1) DKQ-24 items were revised to reflect current diabetes care standards; 2) the Delphi method was used to evaluate the DKQ-R’s content validity (n = 5 experts); 3) cognitive interviews were conducted with people with type 2 diabetes (n = 5) to assess their interpretations of DKQ-R items; 4) cross-sectional administration of the DKQ-R to adults with type 2 diabetes was carried out to assess internal consistency reliability and convergent validity; and 5) an item analysis was conducted using discrimination index and point biserial analysis. RESULTS: After receiving the experts’ feedback and conducting the cognitive interviews, 39 items were administered to 258 participants with type 2 diabetes (42.2% women; 29.1% Latino, 42.6% Asian, mean age 55.7 years). To select the final items, we considered the item discrimination index, as well as item-to-total correlations, content area, and participant feedback. The final 22-item DKQ-R uses the same yes/no/I don’t know response format as the DKQ-24. The DKQ-R is strongly correlated with the DKQ-24 (r = 0.71, P <0.01) and is weakly correlated with diabetes numeracy (r = 0.23, P <0.01), indicating adequate convergent validity; a Kuder-Richardson-20 coefficient of 0.77 indicated good reliability. CONCLUSION: The DKQ-R is a reliable and valid updated measure of diabetes knowledge for diverse populations with type 2 diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10654121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106541212023-05-26 Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes Zuñiga, Julie A. Huang, Ya-Ching Bang, So Hyeon Cuevas, Heather Hutson, Tara Heitkemper, Elizabeth M. Cho, Emma García, Alexandra A. Diabetes Spectr Feature Articles OBJECTIVE: Diabetes knowledge is associated with health, including lower A1C levels. The Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ-24), developed 30 years ago for Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes and since used with diverse samples in many countries, contains outdated items that no longer accurately assess current knowledge needed for diabetes self-management. We revised the DKQ-24 and tested psychometric properties of the DKQ-Revised (DKQ-R) with a diverse sample. METHODS: We conducted a five-phase instrumentation study as follows: 1) DKQ-24 items were revised to reflect current diabetes care standards; 2) the Delphi method was used to evaluate the DKQ-R’s content validity (n = 5 experts); 3) cognitive interviews were conducted with people with type 2 diabetes (n = 5) to assess their interpretations of DKQ-R items; 4) cross-sectional administration of the DKQ-R to adults with type 2 diabetes was carried out to assess internal consistency reliability and convergent validity; and 5) an item analysis was conducted using discrimination index and point biserial analysis. RESULTS: After receiving the experts’ feedback and conducting the cognitive interviews, 39 items were administered to 258 participants with type 2 diabetes (42.2% women; 29.1% Latino, 42.6% Asian, mean age 55.7 years). To select the final items, we considered the item discrimination index, as well as item-to-total correlations, content area, and participant feedback. The final 22-item DKQ-R uses the same yes/no/I don’t know response format as the DKQ-24. The DKQ-R is strongly correlated with the DKQ-24 (r = 0.71, P <0.01) and is weakly correlated with diabetes numeracy (r = 0.23, P <0.01), indicating adequate convergent validity; a Kuder-Richardson-20 coefficient of 0.77 indicated good reliability. CONCLUSION: The DKQ-R is a reliable and valid updated measure of diabetes knowledge for diverse populations with type 2 diabetes. American Diabetes Association 2023 2023-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10654121/ /pubmed/38024222 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/ds22-0079 Text en © 2023 by the American Diabetes Association https://www.diabetesjournals.org/journals/pages/licenseReaders may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/journals/pages/license.
spellingShingle Feature Articles
Zuñiga, Julie A.
Huang, Ya-Ching
Bang, So Hyeon
Cuevas, Heather
Hutson, Tara
Heitkemper, Elizabeth M.
Cho, Emma
García, Alexandra A.
Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes
title Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes
title_full Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes
title_fullStr Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes
title_short Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes
title_sort revision and psychometric evaluation of the diabetes knowledge questionnaire for people with type 2 diabetes
topic Feature Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38024222
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/ds22-0079
work_keys_str_mv AT zunigajuliea revisionandpsychometricevaluationofthediabetesknowledgequestionnaireforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT huangyaching revisionandpsychometricevaluationofthediabetesknowledgequestionnaireforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT bangsohyeon revisionandpsychometricevaluationofthediabetesknowledgequestionnaireforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT cuevasheather revisionandpsychometricevaluationofthediabetesknowledgequestionnaireforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT hutsontara revisionandpsychometricevaluationofthediabetesknowledgequestionnaireforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT heitkemperelizabethm revisionandpsychometricevaluationofthediabetesknowledgequestionnaireforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT choemma revisionandpsychometricevaluationofthediabetesknowledgequestionnaireforpeoplewithtype2diabetes
AT garciaalexandraa revisionandpsychometricevaluationofthediabetesknowledgequestionnaireforpeoplewithtype2diabetes