Cargando…
Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes
OBJECTIVE: Diabetes knowledge is associated with health, including lower A1C levels. The Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ-24), developed 30 years ago for Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes and since used with diverse samples in many countries, contains outdated items that no longer accurate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38024222 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/ds22-0079 |
_version_ | 1785136561146298368 |
---|---|
author | Zuñiga, Julie A. Huang, Ya-Ching Bang, So Hyeon Cuevas, Heather Hutson, Tara Heitkemper, Elizabeth M. Cho, Emma García, Alexandra A. |
author_facet | Zuñiga, Julie A. Huang, Ya-Ching Bang, So Hyeon Cuevas, Heather Hutson, Tara Heitkemper, Elizabeth M. Cho, Emma García, Alexandra A. |
author_sort | Zuñiga, Julie A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Diabetes knowledge is associated with health, including lower A1C levels. The Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ-24), developed 30 years ago for Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes and since used with diverse samples in many countries, contains outdated items that no longer accurately assess current knowledge needed for diabetes self-management. We revised the DKQ-24 and tested psychometric properties of the DKQ-Revised (DKQ-R) with a diverse sample. METHODS: We conducted a five-phase instrumentation study as follows: 1) DKQ-24 items were revised to reflect current diabetes care standards; 2) the Delphi method was used to evaluate the DKQ-R’s content validity (n = 5 experts); 3) cognitive interviews were conducted with people with type 2 diabetes (n = 5) to assess their interpretations of DKQ-R items; 4) cross-sectional administration of the DKQ-R to adults with type 2 diabetes was carried out to assess internal consistency reliability and convergent validity; and 5) an item analysis was conducted using discrimination index and point biserial analysis. RESULTS: After receiving the experts’ feedback and conducting the cognitive interviews, 39 items were administered to 258 participants with type 2 diabetes (42.2% women; 29.1% Latino, 42.6% Asian, mean age 55.7 years). To select the final items, we considered the item discrimination index, as well as item-to-total correlations, content area, and participant feedback. The final 22-item DKQ-R uses the same yes/no/I don’t know response format as the DKQ-24. The DKQ-R is strongly correlated with the DKQ-24 (r = 0.71, P <0.01) and is weakly correlated with diabetes numeracy (r = 0.23, P <0.01), indicating adequate convergent validity; a Kuder-Richardson-20 coefficient of 0.77 indicated good reliability. CONCLUSION: The DKQ-R is a reliable and valid updated measure of diabetes knowledge for diverse populations with type 2 diabetes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10654121 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106541212023-05-26 Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes Zuñiga, Julie A. Huang, Ya-Ching Bang, So Hyeon Cuevas, Heather Hutson, Tara Heitkemper, Elizabeth M. Cho, Emma García, Alexandra A. Diabetes Spectr Feature Articles OBJECTIVE: Diabetes knowledge is associated with health, including lower A1C levels. The Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ-24), developed 30 years ago for Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes and since used with diverse samples in many countries, contains outdated items that no longer accurately assess current knowledge needed for diabetes self-management. We revised the DKQ-24 and tested psychometric properties of the DKQ-Revised (DKQ-R) with a diverse sample. METHODS: We conducted a five-phase instrumentation study as follows: 1) DKQ-24 items were revised to reflect current diabetes care standards; 2) the Delphi method was used to evaluate the DKQ-R’s content validity (n = 5 experts); 3) cognitive interviews were conducted with people with type 2 diabetes (n = 5) to assess their interpretations of DKQ-R items; 4) cross-sectional administration of the DKQ-R to adults with type 2 diabetes was carried out to assess internal consistency reliability and convergent validity; and 5) an item analysis was conducted using discrimination index and point biserial analysis. RESULTS: After receiving the experts’ feedback and conducting the cognitive interviews, 39 items were administered to 258 participants with type 2 diabetes (42.2% women; 29.1% Latino, 42.6% Asian, mean age 55.7 years). To select the final items, we considered the item discrimination index, as well as item-to-total correlations, content area, and participant feedback. The final 22-item DKQ-R uses the same yes/no/I don’t know response format as the DKQ-24. The DKQ-R is strongly correlated with the DKQ-24 (r = 0.71, P <0.01) and is weakly correlated with diabetes numeracy (r = 0.23, P <0.01), indicating adequate convergent validity; a Kuder-Richardson-20 coefficient of 0.77 indicated good reliability. CONCLUSION: The DKQ-R is a reliable and valid updated measure of diabetes knowledge for diverse populations with type 2 diabetes. American Diabetes Association 2023 2023-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10654121/ /pubmed/38024222 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/ds22-0079 Text en © 2023 by the American Diabetes Association https://www.diabetesjournals.org/journals/pages/licenseReaders may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/journals/pages/license. |
spellingShingle | Feature Articles Zuñiga, Julie A. Huang, Ya-Ching Bang, So Hyeon Cuevas, Heather Hutson, Tara Heitkemper, Elizabeth M. Cho, Emma García, Alexandra A. Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes |
title | Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes |
title_full | Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes |
title_fullStr | Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes |
title_short | Revision and Psychometric Evaluation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire for People With Type 2 Diabetes |
title_sort | revision and psychometric evaluation of the diabetes knowledge questionnaire for people with type 2 diabetes |
topic | Feature Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38024222 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/ds22-0079 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zunigajuliea revisionandpsychometricevaluationofthediabetesknowledgequestionnaireforpeoplewithtype2diabetes AT huangyaching revisionandpsychometricevaluationofthediabetesknowledgequestionnaireforpeoplewithtype2diabetes AT bangsohyeon revisionandpsychometricevaluationofthediabetesknowledgequestionnaireforpeoplewithtype2diabetes AT cuevasheather revisionandpsychometricevaluationofthediabetesknowledgequestionnaireforpeoplewithtype2diabetes AT hutsontara revisionandpsychometricevaluationofthediabetesknowledgequestionnaireforpeoplewithtype2diabetes AT heitkemperelizabethm revisionandpsychometricevaluationofthediabetesknowledgequestionnaireforpeoplewithtype2diabetes AT choemma revisionandpsychometricevaluationofthediabetesknowledgequestionnaireforpeoplewithtype2diabetes AT garciaalexandraa revisionandpsychometricevaluationofthediabetesknowledgequestionnaireforpeoplewithtype2diabetes |