Cargando…

Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the multizone NeVa(TM) stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the NeVa(TM) stent retriever as first- and second-line device for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, all consecutive patients that underwent mechanical thrombectom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masthoff, Max, Krähling, Hermann, Akkurt, Burak Han, Elsharkawy, Mohamed, Köhler, Michael, Ergawy, Mostafa, Thomas, Christian, Schwindt, Wolfram, Minnerup, Jens, Stracke, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37878032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-023-03236-4
_version_ 1785136567131570176
author Masthoff, Max
Krähling, Hermann
Akkurt, Burak Han
Elsharkawy, Mohamed
Köhler, Michael
Ergawy, Mostafa
Thomas, Christian
Schwindt, Wolfram
Minnerup, Jens
Stracke, Paul
author_facet Masthoff, Max
Krähling, Hermann
Akkurt, Burak Han
Elsharkawy, Mohamed
Köhler, Michael
Ergawy, Mostafa
Thomas, Christian
Schwindt, Wolfram
Minnerup, Jens
Stracke, Paul
author_sort Masthoff, Max
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the NeVa(TM) stent retriever as first- and second-line device for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, all consecutive patients that underwent mechanical thrombectomy with NeVa(TM) stent retriever as first- or second-line device due to intracranial vessel occlusion with acute ischemic stroke between March and November 2022 were included. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (m=18, f=21) with a mean age of 69.9 ± 13.3 years were treated with the NeVa(TM) stent retriever. NeVa(TM) stent retriever was used as first-line device in 24 (61.5%) of patients and in 15 (38.5%) as second-line device. First-pass rate (≥mTICI 2c) of NeVa(TM) stent retriever was both 66.7% when used as first- or second-line device. Final recanalization rate including rescue strategies was 92.3% for ≥mTICI2c and 94.9% for ≥mTICI2b. No device-related minor or major adverse events were observed. A hemorrhage was detected in 33.3% of patients at 24h post-thrombectomy dual-energy CT, of which none was classified as symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. NIHSS and mRS improved significantly at discharge compared to admission (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The NeVa(TM) stent retriever has a high effectivity and good safety profile as first- and second-line device for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10654155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106541552023-10-25 Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the multizone NeVa(TM) stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke Masthoff, Max Krähling, Hermann Akkurt, Burak Han Elsharkawy, Mohamed Köhler, Michael Ergawy, Mostafa Thomas, Christian Schwindt, Wolfram Minnerup, Jens Stracke, Paul Neuroradiology Interventional Neuroradiology PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the NeVa(TM) stent retriever as first- and second-line device for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, all consecutive patients that underwent mechanical thrombectomy with NeVa(TM) stent retriever as first- or second-line device due to intracranial vessel occlusion with acute ischemic stroke between March and November 2022 were included. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (m=18, f=21) with a mean age of 69.9 ± 13.3 years were treated with the NeVa(TM) stent retriever. NeVa(TM) stent retriever was used as first-line device in 24 (61.5%) of patients and in 15 (38.5%) as second-line device. First-pass rate (≥mTICI 2c) of NeVa(TM) stent retriever was both 66.7% when used as first- or second-line device. Final recanalization rate including rescue strategies was 92.3% for ≥mTICI2c and 94.9% for ≥mTICI2b. No device-related minor or major adverse events were observed. A hemorrhage was detected in 33.3% of patients at 24h post-thrombectomy dual-energy CT, of which none was classified as symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. NIHSS and mRS improved significantly at discharge compared to admission (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The NeVa(TM) stent retriever has a high effectivity and good safety profile as first- and second-line device for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-10-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10654155/ /pubmed/37878032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-023-03236-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Interventional Neuroradiology
Masthoff, Max
Krähling, Hermann
Akkurt, Burak Han
Elsharkawy, Mohamed
Köhler, Michael
Ergawy, Mostafa
Thomas, Christian
Schwindt, Wolfram
Minnerup, Jens
Stracke, Paul
Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the multizone NeVa(TM) stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke
title Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the multizone NeVa(TM) stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke
title_full Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the multizone NeVa(TM) stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke
title_fullStr Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the multizone NeVa(TM) stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the multizone NeVa(TM) stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke
title_short Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the multizone NeVa(TM) stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke
title_sort evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the multizone neva(tm) stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke
topic Interventional Neuroradiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37878032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-023-03236-4
work_keys_str_mv AT masthoffmax evaluationofeffectivenessandsafetyofthemultizonenevatmstentretrieverformechanicalthrombectomyinischemicstroke
AT krahlinghermann evaluationofeffectivenessandsafetyofthemultizonenevatmstentretrieverformechanicalthrombectomyinischemicstroke
AT akkurtburakhan evaluationofeffectivenessandsafetyofthemultizonenevatmstentretrieverformechanicalthrombectomyinischemicstroke
AT elsharkawymohamed evaluationofeffectivenessandsafetyofthemultizonenevatmstentretrieverformechanicalthrombectomyinischemicstroke
AT kohlermichael evaluationofeffectivenessandsafetyofthemultizonenevatmstentretrieverformechanicalthrombectomyinischemicstroke
AT ergawymostafa evaluationofeffectivenessandsafetyofthemultizonenevatmstentretrieverformechanicalthrombectomyinischemicstroke
AT thomaschristian evaluationofeffectivenessandsafetyofthemultizonenevatmstentretrieverformechanicalthrombectomyinischemicstroke
AT schwindtwolfram evaluationofeffectivenessandsafetyofthemultizonenevatmstentretrieverformechanicalthrombectomyinischemicstroke
AT minnerupjens evaluationofeffectivenessandsafetyofthemultizonenevatmstentretrieverformechanicalthrombectomyinischemicstroke
AT strackepaul evaluationofeffectivenessandsafetyofthemultizonenevatmstentretrieverformechanicalthrombectomyinischemicstroke