Cargando…

A Model to Predict Future Biologic or Targeted Synthetic DMARD Switch at a Subsequent Clinic Visit in Rheumatoid Arthritis

INTRODUCTION: To understand factors leading to biologic switches and to develop a readily usable model with data collected in clinical care at preceding visits, with the overall aim to predict the probability of switching biologic at a subsequent clinic visit in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cappelli, Laura C., Reed, George, Pappas, Dimitrios A., Kremer, Joel M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37858006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-023-00606-5
_version_ 1785136593307172864
author Cappelli, Laura C.
Reed, George
Pappas, Dimitrios A.
Kremer, Joel M.
author_facet Cappelli, Laura C.
Reed, George
Pappas, Dimitrios A.
Kremer, Joel M.
author_sort Cappelli, Laura C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To understand factors leading to biologic switches and to develop a readily usable model with data collected in clinical care at preceding visits, with the overall aim to predict the probability of switching biologic at a subsequent clinic visit in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Participants were adults with RA participating in the CorEvitas RA registry. The study matched patients who switched biologics or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs) with control patients who had not switched biologics/tsDMARDs; the cohort was divided into a training and test set for prediction model development and validation. Using the training set, the best subset regression, lasso, and elastic net methods were used to determine the best potential models. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used for the final selection of the best model, and estimated coefficients of this model were applied to the test dataset to predict switching. RESULTS: A total of 5050 patients were included, of whom 3016 were in the training set and 2034 were in the test dataset. The average age was 59.6 years, the majority were female (3998, 79.2%), and the average duration of RA at the time of switch or control visit was 12.8 years. The final model included prior Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) by category, prior patient pain measurement, change in CDAI from baseline, age group, and number of prior biologics, all of which were significantly associated with switching biologics. The AUC was 0.690 for this model with the training dataset. The model was then applied to the test data with similar performance; the AUC was 0.687. CONCLUSION: We have developed a simple model to determine the probability of switching biologics for RA at the following clinic visit. This model could be used in practice to provide clinicians with more information about their patient’s trajectory and likelihood of switching to a new biologic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-023-00606-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10654285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106542852023-10-19 A Model to Predict Future Biologic or Targeted Synthetic DMARD Switch at a Subsequent Clinic Visit in Rheumatoid Arthritis Cappelli, Laura C. Reed, George Pappas, Dimitrios A. Kremer, Joel M. Rheumatol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: To understand factors leading to biologic switches and to develop a readily usable model with data collected in clinical care at preceding visits, with the overall aim to predict the probability of switching biologic at a subsequent clinic visit in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Participants were adults with RA participating in the CorEvitas RA registry. The study matched patients who switched biologics or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs) with control patients who had not switched biologics/tsDMARDs; the cohort was divided into a training and test set for prediction model development and validation. Using the training set, the best subset regression, lasso, and elastic net methods were used to determine the best potential models. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used for the final selection of the best model, and estimated coefficients of this model were applied to the test dataset to predict switching. RESULTS: A total of 5050 patients were included, of whom 3016 were in the training set and 2034 were in the test dataset. The average age was 59.6 years, the majority were female (3998, 79.2%), and the average duration of RA at the time of switch or control visit was 12.8 years. The final model included prior Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) by category, prior patient pain measurement, change in CDAI from baseline, age group, and number of prior biologics, all of which were significantly associated with switching biologics. The AUC was 0.690 for this model with the training dataset. The model was then applied to the test data with similar performance; the AUC was 0.687. CONCLUSION: We have developed a simple model to determine the probability of switching biologics for RA at the following clinic visit. This model could be used in practice to provide clinicians with more information about their patient’s trajectory and likelihood of switching to a new biologic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-023-00606-5. Springer Healthcare 2023-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10654285/ /pubmed/37858006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-023-00606-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Cappelli, Laura C.
Reed, George
Pappas, Dimitrios A.
Kremer, Joel M.
A Model to Predict Future Biologic or Targeted Synthetic DMARD Switch at a Subsequent Clinic Visit in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title A Model to Predict Future Biologic or Targeted Synthetic DMARD Switch at a Subsequent Clinic Visit in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full A Model to Predict Future Biologic or Targeted Synthetic DMARD Switch at a Subsequent Clinic Visit in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_fullStr A Model to Predict Future Biologic or Targeted Synthetic DMARD Switch at a Subsequent Clinic Visit in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full_unstemmed A Model to Predict Future Biologic or Targeted Synthetic DMARD Switch at a Subsequent Clinic Visit in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_short A Model to Predict Future Biologic or Targeted Synthetic DMARD Switch at a Subsequent Clinic Visit in Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_sort model to predict future biologic or targeted synthetic dmard switch at a subsequent clinic visit in rheumatoid arthritis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37858006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-023-00606-5
work_keys_str_mv AT cappellilaurac amodeltopredictfuturebiologicortargetedsyntheticdmardswitchatasubsequentclinicvisitinrheumatoidarthritis
AT reedgeorge amodeltopredictfuturebiologicortargetedsyntheticdmardswitchatasubsequentclinicvisitinrheumatoidarthritis
AT pappasdimitriosa amodeltopredictfuturebiologicortargetedsyntheticdmardswitchatasubsequentclinicvisitinrheumatoidarthritis
AT kremerjoelm amodeltopredictfuturebiologicortargetedsyntheticdmardswitchatasubsequentclinicvisitinrheumatoidarthritis
AT cappellilaurac modeltopredictfuturebiologicortargetedsyntheticdmardswitchatasubsequentclinicvisitinrheumatoidarthritis
AT reedgeorge modeltopredictfuturebiologicortargetedsyntheticdmardswitchatasubsequentclinicvisitinrheumatoidarthritis
AT pappasdimitriosa modeltopredictfuturebiologicortargetedsyntheticdmardswitchatasubsequentclinicvisitinrheumatoidarthritis
AT kremerjoelm modeltopredictfuturebiologicortargetedsyntheticdmardswitchatasubsequentclinicvisitinrheumatoidarthritis