Cargando…

Validation of scoring systems for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults using clinical and computed tomographic findings

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate scoring systems for predicting complicated appendicitis in adults diagnosed with acute appendicitis on computed tomography. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-five consecutive adult patients (mean age 51.9 ± 19.6 years, 212 women) diagnosed with acute appendicitis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaewlai, Rathachai, Tongsai, Sasima, Teerasamit, Wanwarang, Wongsaengchan, Dhanawin, Noppakunsomboon, Napakadol, Khamman, Pramuk, Chatkaewpaisal, Anchisa, Apisarnthanarak, Piyaporn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37973644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01540-4
_version_ 1785147829010825216
author Kaewlai, Rathachai
Tongsai, Sasima
Teerasamit, Wanwarang
Wongsaengchan, Dhanawin
Noppakunsomboon, Napakadol
Khamman, Pramuk
Chatkaewpaisal, Anchisa
Apisarnthanarak, Piyaporn
author_facet Kaewlai, Rathachai
Tongsai, Sasima
Teerasamit, Wanwarang
Wongsaengchan, Dhanawin
Noppakunsomboon, Napakadol
Khamman, Pramuk
Chatkaewpaisal, Anchisa
Apisarnthanarak, Piyaporn
author_sort Kaewlai, Rathachai
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate scoring systems for predicting complicated appendicitis in adults diagnosed with acute appendicitis on computed tomography. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-five consecutive adult patients (mean age 51.9 ± 19.6 years, 212 women) diagnosed with acute appendicitis on computed tomography were retrospectively included. Clinical and imaging findings were compared between patients with and without complicated appendicitis, and independent associations were identified. As C-reactive protein was not available for most patients, 5 out of 8 scoring systems were modified. They, and a newly proposed system, were compared via area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC), Additionally, the latter was internally validated. Pairwise comparison was performed, and diagnostic performance of these scoring systems was obtained. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients (36.8%) had complicated appendicitis. Significant independent associations were found between complicated appendicitis and duration of symptoms > 12 h, appendicolith, periappendiceal fat stranding, periappendiceal fluid, and extraluminal air (p values < 0.001 to 0.037; AUCs of 0.824–0.829). AUCs of 9 scoring systems ranged from 0.692 to 0.831. Of these, modified Atema, Kim HY, and proposed scores had similarly high and non-significantly different AUCs (0.793–0.831) on pairwise comparison. Their sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies were 73.0–90.6%, 48.5–70.6%, and 64.3–72.3%, respectively. Internal validity test demonstrated high AUCs (0.826–0.844) with one of the proposed scores using odds ratio having 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: Few scoring systems, including proposed ones, had high AUCs, sensitivity, and reasonable specificities, which could potentially aid in safely selecting adult patients with acute appendicitis for nonoperative management. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The study suggests few scoring systems for predicting complicated appendicitis with high AUCs and reasonable sensitivities, potentially aiding in selecting patients for nonoperative management. KEY POINTS: • The study evaluated existing and proposed new scoring systems to predict complicated appendicitis in adults with acute appendicitis on computed tomography. • Several factors were found to be significantly associated with complicated appendicitis, including duration of symptoms, appendicolith, periappendiceal fat stranding, periappendiceal fluid, and extraluminal air. • The modified Atema, Kim HY, and newly proposed scoring systems performed well, potentially aiding in nonoperative management selection. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01540-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10654319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106543192023-11-16 Validation of scoring systems for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults using clinical and computed tomographic findings Kaewlai, Rathachai Tongsai, Sasima Teerasamit, Wanwarang Wongsaengchan, Dhanawin Noppakunsomboon, Napakadol Khamman, Pramuk Chatkaewpaisal, Anchisa Apisarnthanarak, Piyaporn Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate scoring systems for predicting complicated appendicitis in adults diagnosed with acute appendicitis on computed tomography. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-five consecutive adult patients (mean age 51.9 ± 19.6 years, 212 women) diagnosed with acute appendicitis on computed tomography were retrospectively included. Clinical and imaging findings were compared between patients with and without complicated appendicitis, and independent associations were identified. As C-reactive protein was not available for most patients, 5 out of 8 scoring systems were modified. They, and a newly proposed system, were compared via area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC), Additionally, the latter was internally validated. Pairwise comparison was performed, and diagnostic performance of these scoring systems was obtained. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients (36.8%) had complicated appendicitis. Significant independent associations were found between complicated appendicitis and duration of symptoms > 12 h, appendicolith, periappendiceal fat stranding, periappendiceal fluid, and extraluminal air (p values < 0.001 to 0.037; AUCs of 0.824–0.829). AUCs of 9 scoring systems ranged from 0.692 to 0.831. Of these, modified Atema, Kim HY, and proposed scores had similarly high and non-significantly different AUCs (0.793–0.831) on pairwise comparison. Their sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies were 73.0–90.6%, 48.5–70.6%, and 64.3–72.3%, respectively. Internal validity test demonstrated high AUCs (0.826–0.844) with one of the proposed scores using odds ratio having 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: Few scoring systems, including proposed ones, had high AUCs, sensitivity, and reasonable specificities, which could potentially aid in safely selecting adult patients with acute appendicitis for nonoperative management. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The study suggests few scoring systems for predicting complicated appendicitis with high AUCs and reasonable sensitivities, potentially aiding in selecting patients for nonoperative management. KEY POINTS: • The study evaluated existing and proposed new scoring systems to predict complicated appendicitis in adults with acute appendicitis on computed tomography. • Several factors were found to be significantly associated with complicated appendicitis, including duration of symptoms, appendicolith, periappendiceal fat stranding, periappendiceal fluid, and extraluminal air. • The modified Atema, Kim HY, and newly proposed scoring systems performed well, potentially aiding in nonoperative management selection. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01540-4. Springer Vienna 2023-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10654319/ /pubmed/37973644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01540-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Kaewlai, Rathachai
Tongsai, Sasima
Teerasamit, Wanwarang
Wongsaengchan, Dhanawin
Noppakunsomboon, Napakadol
Khamman, Pramuk
Chatkaewpaisal, Anchisa
Apisarnthanarak, Piyaporn
Validation of scoring systems for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults using clinical and computed tomographic findings
title Validation of scoring systems for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults using clinical and computed tomographic findings
title_full Validation of scoring systems for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults using clinical and computed tomographic findings
title_fullStr Validation of scoring systems for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults using clinical and computed tomographic findings
title_full_unstemmed Validation of scoring systems for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults using clinical and computed tomographic findings
title_short Validation of scoring systems for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults using clinical and computed tomographic findings
title_sort validation of scoring systems for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults using clinical and computed tomographic findings
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37973644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01540-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kaewlairathachai validationofscoringsystemsforthepredictionofcomplicatedappendicitisinadultsusingclinicalandcomputedtomographicfindings
AT tongsaisasima validationofscoringsystemsforthepredictionofcomplicatedappendicitisinadultsusingclinicalandcomputedtomographicfindings
AT teerasamitwanwarang validationofscoringsystemsforthepredictionofcomplicatedappendicitisinadultsusingclinicalandcomputedtomographicfindings
AT wongsaengchandhanawin validationofscoringsystemsforthepredictionofcomplicatedappendicitisinadultsusingclinicalandcomputedtomographicfindings
AT noppakunsomboonnapakadol validationofscoringsystemsforthepredictionofcomplicatedappendicitisinadultsusingclinicalandcomputedtomographicfindings
AT khammanpramuk validationofscoringsystemsforthepredictionofcomplicatedappendicitisinadultsusingclinicalandcomputedtomographicfindings
AT chatkaewpaisalanchisa validationofscoringsystemsforthepredictionofcomplicatedappendicitisinadultsusingclinicalandcomputedtomographicfindings
AT apisarnthanarakpiyaporn validationofscoringsystemsforthepredictionofcomplicatedappendicitisinadultsusingclinicalandcomputedtomographicfindings