Cargando…
Comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune chronic inflammatory disease affecting 0.5%−1% of adults worldwide. The carotid intima‐media thickness (CIMT) is a simple, reliable, noninvasive marker for subclinical atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to compare the intima‐medi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38028704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1718 |
_version_ | 1785147834957299712 |
---|---|
author | Rajabzadeh, Farnood Akhlaghipour, Iman Moosavi, Sahar Sadat Nasimi Shad, Arya Babazadeh Baghan, Atefeh Shariati‐Sarabi, Zhaleh Payandeh, Asma Hassan Nejad, Ehsan |
author_facet | Rajabzadeh, Farnood Akhlaghipour, Iman Moosavi, Sahar Sadat Nasimi Shad, Arya Babazadeh Baghan, Atefeh Shariati‐Sarabi, Zhaleh Payandeh, Asma Hassan Nejad, Ehsan |
author_sort | Rajabzadeh, Farnood |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune chronic inflammatory disease affecting 0.5%−1% of adults worldwide. The carotid intima‐media thickness (CIMT) is a simple, reliable, noninvasive marker for subclinical atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to compare the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with RA with that of healthy patients. METHODS: In this case‐control study, subjects were recruited from the patients who presented to a private rheumatology clinic. RA was documented by a rheumatologist. All subjects underwent an ultrasound examination of the carotid artery to assess CIMT. Subjects with RA filled out the disease activity score (DAS28) questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty‐two subjects (31 subjects with RA and 31 healthy subjects) took part in the study. The mean age of the subjects in the RA and the control groups was 42.39 ± 12.98 and 44.48 ± 13.56 years, respectively. Values of CIMT were significantly greater in RA subjects compared with their healthy counterparts (p < 0.001). The CIMT increased significantly with increased disease severity (r = 0.73). Subjects were divided into two age groups (≤40 and >40 years). A comparison of CIMT in the mentioned subgroups revealed a remarkable difference in CIMT values between those of the RA patients and those of their control counterparts in both age groups (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001 for those below and above 40 years, respectively). CONCLUSION: CIMT could be used as an efficient clinical index for identifying the early stages of atherosclerosis and predicting cardiovascular events following atherosclerosis in RA patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10654376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106543762023-11-16 Comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature Rajabzadeh, Farnood Akhlaghipour, Iman Moosavi, Sahar Sadat Nasimi Shad, Arya Babazadeh Baghan, Atefeh Shariati‐Sarabi, Zhaleh Payandeh, Asma Hassan Nejad, Ehsan Health Sci Rep Original Research BACKGROUND AND AIM: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune chronic inflammatory disease affecting 0.5%−1% of adults worldwide. The carotid intima‐media thickness (CIMT) is a simple, reliable, noninvasive marker for subclinical atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to compare the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with RA with that of healthy patients. METHODS: In this case‐control study, subjects were recruited from the patients who presented to a private rheumatology clinic. RA was documented by a rheumatologist. All subjects underwent an ultrasound examination of the carotid artery to assess CIMT. Subjects with RA filled out the disease activity score (DAS28) questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty‐two subjects (31 subjects with RA and 31 healthy subjects) took part in the study. The mean age of the subjects in the RA and the control groups was 42.39 ± 12.98 and 44.48 ± 13.56 years, respectively. Values of CIMT were significantly greater in RA subjects compared with their healthy counterparts (p < 0.001). The CIMT increased significantly with increased disease severity (r = 0.73). Subjects were divided into two age groups (≤40 and >40 years). A comparison of CIMT in the mentioned subgroups revealed a remarkable difference in CIMT values between those of the RA patients and those of their control counterparts in both age groups (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001 for those below and above 40 years, respectively). CONCLUSION: CIMT could be used as an efficient clinical index for identifying the early stages of atherosclerosis and predicting cardiovascular events following atherosclerosis in RA patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10654376/ /pubmed/38028704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1718 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rajabzadeh, Farnood Akhlaghipour, Iman Moosavi, Sahar Sadat Nasimi Shad, Arya Babazadeh Baghan, Atefeh Shariati‐Sarabi, Zhaleh Payandeh, Asma Hassan Nejad, Ehsan Comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature |
title | Comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature |
title_full | Comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature |
title_short | Comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature |
title_sort | comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38028704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1718 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajabzadehfarnood comparisonoftheintimamediathicknessofthecommoncarotidarteryinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisasinglecentercrosssectionalcasecontrolstudyandabriefreviewoftheliterature AT akhlaghipouriman comparisonoftheintimamediathicknessofthecommoncarotidarteryinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisasinglecentercrosssectionalcasecontrolstudyandabriefreviewoftheliterature AT moosavisaharsadat comparisonoftheintimamediathicknessofthecommoncarotidarteryinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisasinglecentercrosssectionalcasecontrolstudyandabriefreviewoftheliterature AT nasimishadarya comparisonoftheintimamediathicknessofthecommoncarotidarteryinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisasinglecentercrosssectionalcasecontrolstudyandabriefreviewoftheliterature AT babazadehbaghanatefeh comparisonoftheintimamediathicknessofthecommoncarotidarteryinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisasinglecentercrosssectionalcasecontrolstudyandabriefreviewoftheliterature AT shariatisarabizhaleh comparisonoftheintimamediathicknessofthecommoncarotidarteryinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisasinglecentercrosssectionalcasecontrolstudyandabriefreviewoftheliterature AT payandehasma comparisonoftheintimamediathicknessofthecommoncarotidarteryinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisasinglecentercrosssectionalcasecontrolstudyandabriefreviewoftheliterature AT hassannejadehsan comparisonoftheintimamediathicknessofthecommoncarotidarteryinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisasinglecentercrosssectionalcasecontrolstudyandabriefreviewoftheliterature |