Cargando…

Comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune chronic inflammatory disease affecting 0.5%−1% of adults worldwide. The carotid intima‐media thickness (CIMT) is a simple, reliable, noninvasive marker for subclinical atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to compare the intima‐medi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajabzadeh, Farnood, Akhlaghipour, Iman, Moosavi, Sahar Sadat, Nasimi Shad, Arya, Babazadeh Baghan, Atefeh, Shariati‐Sarabi, Zhaleh, Payandeh, Asma, Hassan Nejad, Ehsan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38028704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1718
_version_ 1785147834957299712
author Rajabzadeh, Farnood
Akhlaghipour, Iman
Moosavi, Sahar Sadat
Nasimi Shad, Arya
Babazadeh Baghan, Atefeh
Shariati‐Sarabi, Zhaleh
Payandeh, Asma
Hassan Nejad, Ehsan
author_facet Rajabzadeh, Farnood
Akhlaghipour, Iman
Moosavi, Sahar Sadat
Nasimi Shad, Arya
Babazadeh Baghan, Atefeh
Shariati‐Sarabi, Zhaleh
Payandeh, Asma
Hassan Nejad, Ehsan
author_sort Rajabzadeh, Farnood
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune chronic inflammatory disease affecting 0.5%−1% of adults worldwide. The carotid intima‐media thickness (CIMT) is a simple, reliable, noninvasive marker for subclinical atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to compare the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with RA with that of healthy patients. METHODS: In this case‐control study, subjects were recruited from the patients who presented to a private rheumatology clinic. RA was documented by a rheumatologist. All subjects underwent an ultrasound examination of the carotid artery to assess CIMT. Subjects with RA filled out the disease activity score (DAS28) questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty‐two subjects (31 subjects with RA and 31 healthy subjects) took part in the study. The mean age of the subjects in the RA and the control groups was 42.39 ± 12.98 and 44.48 ± 13.56 years, respectively. Values of CIMT were significantly greater in RA subjects compared with their healthy counterparts (p < 0.001). The CIMT increased significantly with increased disease severity (r = 0.73). Subjects were divided into two age groups (≤40 and >40 years). A comparison of CIMT in the mentioned subgroups revealed a remarkable difference in CIMT values between those of the RA patients and those of their control counterparts in both age groups (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001 for those below and above 40 years, respectively). CONCLUSION: CIMT could be used as an efficient clinical index for identifying the early stages of atherosclerosis and predicting cardiovascular events following atherosclerosis in RA patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10654376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106543762023-11-16 Comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature Rajabzadeh, Farnood Akhlaghipour, Iman Moosavi, Sahar Sadat Nasimi Shad, Arya Babazadeh Baghan, Atefeh Shariati‐Sarabi, Zhaleh Payandeh, Asma Hassan Nejad, Ehsan Health Sci Rep Original Research BACKGROUND AND AIM: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune chronic inflammatory disease affecting 0.5%−1% of adults worldwide. The carotid intima‐media thickness (CIMT) is a simple, reliable, noninvasive marker for subclinical atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to compare the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with RA with that of healthy patients. METHODS: In this case‐control study, subjects were recruited from the patients who presented to a private rheumatology clinic. RA was documented by a rheumatologist. All subjects underwent an ultrasound examination of the carotid artery to assess CIMT. Subjects with RA filled out the disease activity score (DAS28) questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty‐two subjects (31 subjects with RA and 31 healthy subjects) took part in the study. The mean age of the subjects in the RA and the control groups was 42.39 ± 12.98 and 44.48 ± 13.56 years, respectively. Values of CIMT were significantly greater in RA subjects compared with their healthy counterparts (p < 0.001). The CIMT increased significantly with increased disease severity (r = 0.73). Subjects were divided into two age groups (≤40 and >40 years). A comparison of CIMT in the mentioned subgroups revealed a remarkable difference in CIMT values between those of the RA patients and those of their control counterparts in both age groups (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001 for those below and above 40 years, respectively). CONCLUSION: CIMT could be used as an efficient clinical index for identifying the early stages of atherosclerosis and predicting cardiovascular events following atherosclerosis in RA patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10654376/ /pubmed/38028704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1718 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rajabzadeh, Farnood
Akhlaghipour, Iman
Moosavi, Sahar Sadat
Nasimi Shad, Arya
Babazadeh Baghan, Atefeh
Shariati‐Sarabi, Zhaleh
Payandeh, Asma
Hassan Nejad, Ehsan
Comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature
title Comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature
title_full Comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature
title_fullStr Comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature
title_short Comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature
title_sort comparison of the intima‐media thickness of the common carotid artery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a single‐center cross‐sectional case‐control study, and a brief review of the literature
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38028704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1718
work_keys_str_mv AT rajabzadehfarnood comparisonoftheintimamediathicknessofthecommoncarotidarteryinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisasinglecentercrosssectionalcasecontrolstudyandabriefreviewoftheliterature
AT akhlaghipouriman comparisonoftheintimamediathicknessofthecommoncarotidarteryinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisasinglecentercrosssectionalcasecontrolstudyandabriefreviewoftheliterature
AT moosavisaharsadat comparisonoftheintimamediathicknessofthecommoncarotidarteryinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisasinglecentercrosssectionalcasecontrolstudyandabriefreviewoftheliterature
AT nasimishadarya comparisonoftheintimamediathicknessofthecommoncarotidarteryinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisasinglecentercrosssectionalcasecontrolstudyandabriefreviewoftheliterature
AT babazadehbaghanatefeh comparisonoftheintimamediathicknessofthecommoncarotidarteryinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisasinglecentercrosssectionalcasecontrolstudyandabriefreviewoftheliterature
AT shariatisarabizhaleh comparisonoftheintimamediathicknessofthecommoncarotidarteryinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisasinglecentercrosssectionalcasecontrolstudyandabriefreviewoftheliterature
AT payandehasma comparisonoftheintimamediathicknessofthecommoncarotidarteryinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisasinglecentercrosssectionalcasecontrolstudyandabriefreviewoftheliterature
AT hassannejadehsan comparisonoftheintimamediathicknessofthecommoncarotidarteryinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisasinglecentercrosssectionalcasecontrolstudyandabriefreviewoftheliterature