Cargando…

Screening de cardiopatías en niños y adolescentes (Prevencar Program)

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop a screening for heart disease detection in primary care, to identify pathological electrocardiographic changes and underlying heart disease in adolescents. DESIGN: The study was carried out for one year using multistage sampling. SITE: Primary care centers in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zapata Martínez, Marta, Pardo Ríos, Manuel, García Alberola, Arcadio, López-Picazo Ferrer, Julio, Banacloche Cano, Cecilia, Iglesias Gómez, Carlos, Pérez Gálvez, M. Dolores, Fernández Redondo, Concepción, Gimeno Blanes, Juan Ramón
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37924621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2023.102782
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop a screening for heart disease detection in primary care, to identify pathological electrocardiographic changes and underlying heart disease in adolescents. DESIGN: The study was carried out for one year using multistage sampling. SITE: Primary care centers in a health area that had digital ECG equipment (12 centers) were selected. PARTICIPANTS: Initially, 718 (16.6%) 14-year-old adolescents were recruited and those with a previous diagnosis of heart disease were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Screening consisted of including a health questionnaire in the mandatory 14-year-old check-up. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Screening included a questionnaire, cardiac auscultation, ECG and echocardiography. Abnormality criteria were established to refer for a second evaluation by a cardiologist. RESULTS: Finally, the sample was made up of 698 adolescents, with a mean age of 13.7 ± 0.5 years, and 354 (50.7%) were boys. A total of 149 (21.3%) were selected for a second review by cardiology: 88 (12.6%) due to a positive questionnaire, 11 (2.2%) due to abnormal cardiac auscultation, and 66 (9.5%) due to ECG findings. Adolescents with evidence of heart disease were 24 (3.4%). Of these, 14 (2.0%) had suggestive alterations and follow-up was recommended, 6 (0.9%) had a definitive diagnosis of heart disease, and 4 (0.6%) had other pathological findings related to the cardiovascular system. CONCLUSIONS: The screening allowed us to identify 1% of adolescents with heart disease and another 2% will remain in follow-up. The ECG detected more pathological cases than the questionnaire.