Cargando…

Antimicrobial prophylaxis with teicoplanin plus gentamicin in primary total joint arthroplasty

Objectives: To compare prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and acute kidney injury (AKI) rates among cohorts before and after changing our hospital's antimicrobial prophylactic regimen from cefuroxime to teicoplanin plus gentamicin. Methods: We retrospectively studied all patients undergoing prima...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: t, [, Gerrand, Craig, Skinner, John A., Sell, Alexander, McCulloch, Robert A., Warren, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Copernicus GmbH 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38039328
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-219-2023
_version_ 1785136661482438656
author t, [
Gerrand, Craig
Skinner, John A.
Sell, Alexander
McCulloch, Robert A.
Warren, Simon
author_facet t, [
Gerrand, Craig
Skinner, John A.
Sell, Alexander
McCulloch, Robert A.
Warren, Simon
author_sort t, [
collection PubMed
description Objectives: To compare prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and acute kidney injury (AKI) rates among cohorts before and after changing our hospital's antimicrobial prophylactic regimen from cefuroxime to teicoplanin plus gentamicin. Methods: We retrospectively studied all patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty at our hospital 18 months pre- and post-implementation of the change in practice. All deep infections identified during follow-up were assessed against the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) definitions for PJI. Survival analysis using Cox regression was employed to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics and compare the risk of PJI between the groups. AKIs were identified using pathology records and categorized according to the KDIGO (Kidney Disease – Improving Global Outcomes) criteria. AKI rates were calculated for the pre- and post-intervention periods. Results: Of 1994 evaluable patients, 1114 (55.9 %) received cefuroxime only (pre-intervention group) and 880 (44.1 %) patients received teicoplanin plus gentamicin (post-intervention group). The overall rate of PJI in our study was 1.50 % (30 of 1994), with a lower PJI rate in the post-intervention group (0.57 %; 5 of 880) compared with the pre-intervention group (2.24 %; 25 of 1114). A corresponding risk reduction for PJI of 75.2 % (95 % CI of 35.2–90.5; [Formula: see text] .004) was seen in the post-intervention group, which was most pronounced for early-onset and delayed infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and cefuroxime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Significantly higher AKI rates were seen in the post-intervention group; however, 84 % of cases (32 of 38) were stage 1, and there were no differences in the rate of stage-2 or -3 AKI. Conclusions: Teicoplanin plus gentamicin was associated with a significant reduction in PJI rates compared with cefuroxime. Increases in stage-1 AKI were seen with teicoplanin plus gentamicin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10654607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Copernicus GmbH
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106546072023-10-30 Antimicrobial prophylaxis with teicoplanin plus gentamicin in primary total joint arthroplasty t, [ Gerrand, Craig Skinner, John A. Sell, Alexander McCulloch, Robert A. Warren, Simon J Bone Jt Infect Original Full-Length Article Objectives: To compare prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and acute kidney injury (AKI) rates among cohorts before and after changing our hospital's antimicrobial prophylactic regimen from cefuroxime to teicoplanin plus gentamicin. Methods: We retrospectively studied all patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty at our hospital 18 months pre- and post-implementation of the change in practice. All deep infections identified during follow-up were assessed against the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) definitions for PJI. Survival analysis using Cox regression was employed to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics and compare the risk of PJI between the groups. AKIs were identified using pathology records and categorized according to the KDIGO (Kidney Disease – Improving Global Outcomes) criteria. AKI rates were calculated for the pre- and post-intervention periods. Results: Of 1994 evaluable patients, 1114 (55.9 %) received cefuroxime only (pre-intervention group) and 880 (44.1 %) patients received teicoplanin plus gentamicin (post-intervention group). The overall rate of PJI in our study was 1.50 % (30 of 1994), with a lower PJI rate in the post-intervention group (0.57 %; 5 of 880) compared with the pre-intervention group (2.24 %; 25 of 1114). A corresponding risk reduction for PJI of 75.2 % (95 % CI of 35.2–90.5; [Formula: see text] .004) was seen in the post-intervention group, which was most pronounced for early-onset and delayed infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and cefuroxime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Significantly higher AKI rates were seen in the post-intervention group; however, 84 % of cases (32 of 38) were stage 1, and there were no differences in the rate of stage-2 or -3 AKI. Conclusions: Teicoplanin plus gentamicin was associated with a significant reduction in PJI rates compared with cefuroxime. Increases in stage-1 AKI were seen with teicoplanin plus gentamicin. Copernicus GmbH 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10654607/ /pubmed/38039328 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-219-2023 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Tariq Azamgarhi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Full-Length Article
t, [
Gerrand, Craig
Skinner, John A.
Sell, Alexander
McCulloch, Robert A.
Warren, Simon
Antimicrobial prophylaxis with teicoplanin plus gentamicin in primary total joint arthroplasty
title Antimicrobial prophylaxis with teicoplanin plus gentamicin in primary total joint arthroplasty
title_full Antimicrobial prophylaxis with teicoplanin plus gentamicin in primary total joint arthroplasty
title_fullStr Antimicrobial prophylaxis with teicoplanin plus gentamicin in primary total joint arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial prophylaxis with teicoplanin plus gentamicin in primary total joint arthroplasty
title_short Antimicrobial prophylaxis with teicoplanin plus gentamicin in primary total joint arthroplasty
title_sort antimicrobial prophylaxis with teicoplanin plus gentamicin in primary total joint arthroplasty
topic Original Full-Length Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38039328
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-219-2023
work_keys_str_mv AT t antimicrobialprophylaxiswithteicoplaninplusgentamicininprimarytotaljointarthroplasty
AT gerrandcraig antimicrobialprophylaxiswithteicoplaninplusgentamicininprimarytotaljointarthroplasty
AT skinnerjohna antimicrobialprophylaxiswithteicoplaninplusgentamicininprimarytotaljointarthroplasty
AT sellalexander antimicrobialprophylaxiswithteicoplaninplusgentamicininprimarytotaljointarthroplasty
AT mccullochroberta antimicrobialprophylaxiswithteicoplaninplusgentamicininprimarytotaljointarthroplasty
AT warrensimon antimicrobialprophylaxiswithteicoplaninplusgentamicininprimarytotaljointarthroplasty