Cargando…
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Fabric-Based Wireless Electroceutical Dressing Compared to Standard-of-Care Treatment Against Acute Trauma and Burn Wound Biofilm Infection
OBJECTIVE: Despite advances in the use of topical and parenteral antimicrobial therapy and the practice of early tangential burn wound excision to manage bacterial load, 60% of the mortality from burns is attributed to bacterial biofilm infection. A low electric field (∼1 V) generated by the novel F...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2024
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36855334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0007 |
_version_ | 1785136670499143680 |
---|---|
author | Chan, Rodney K. Nuutila, Kristo Mathew-Steiner, Shomita S. Diaz, Victoria Anselmo, Kristin Batchinsky, Maria Carlsson, Anders Ghosh, Nandini Sen, Chandan K. Roy, Sashwati |
author_facet | Chan, Rodney K. Nuutila, Kristo Mathew-Steiner, Shomita S. Diaz, Victoria Anselmo, Kristin Batchinsky, Maria Carlsson, Anders Ghosh, Nandini Sen, Chandan K. Roy, Sashwati |
author_sort | Chan, Rodney K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Despite advances in the use of topical and parenteral antimicrobial therapy and the practice of early tangential burn wound excision to manage bacterial load, 60% of the mortality from burns is attributed to bacterial biofilm infection. A low electric field (∼1 V) generated by the novel FDA-cleared wireless electroceutical dressing (WED) was previously shown to significantly prevent and disrupt burn biofilm infection in preclinical studies. Based on this observation, the purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of the WED dressing powered by a silver–zinc electrocouple in the prevention and disruption of biofilm infection. APPROACH: : A prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of the WED compared with standard-of-care (SoC) dressing to treat biofilms. Burn wounds were randomized to receive either SoC or WED. Biopsies were collected on days 0 and 7 for histology, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination of biofilm, and for quantitative bacteriological analyses. RESULTS: In total, 38 subjects were enrolled in the study. In 52% of the WED-treated wounds, little to no biofilm could be detected by SEM. WED significantly lowered or prevented increase of biofilm in all wounds compared with the pair-matched SoC-treated wounds. INNOVATION: WED is a simple, easy, and rapid method to protect the wound while also inhibiting infection. It is activated by a moist environment and the electrical field induces transient and micromolar amounts of superoxide anion radicals that will prevent bacterial growth. CONCLUSION: WED decreased biofilm infection better compared with SoC. The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04079998. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10654645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106546452023-11-03 A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Fabric-Based Wireless Electroceutical Dressing Compared to Standard-of-Care Treatment Against Acute Trauma and Burn Wound Biofilm Infection Chan, Rodney K. Nuutila, Kristo Mathew-Steiner, Shomita S. Diaz, Victoria Anselmo, Kristin Batchinsky, Maria Carlsson, Anders Ghosh, Nandini Sen, Chandan K. Roy, Sashwati Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Technology Advances OBJECTIVE: Despite advances in the use of topical and parenteral antimicrobial therapy and the practice of early tangential burn wound excision to manage bacterial load, 60% of the mortality from burns is attributed to bacterial biofilm infection. A low electric field (∼1 V) generated by the novel FDA-cleared wireless electroceutical dressing (WED) was previously shown to significantly prevent and disrupt burn biofilm infection in preclinical studies. Based on this observation, the purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of the WED dressing powered by a silver–zinc electrocouple in the prevention and disruption of biofilm infection. APPROACH: : A prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of the WED compared with standard-of-care (SoC) dressing to treat biofilms. Burn wounds were randomized to receive either SoC or WED. Biopsies were collected on days 0 and 7 for histology, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination of biofilm, and for quantitative bacteriological analyses. RESULTS: In total, 38 subjects were enrolled in the study. In 52% of the WED-treated wounds, little to no biofilm could be detected by SEM. WED significantly lowered or prevented increase of biofilm in all wounds compared with the pair-matched SoC-treated wounds. INNOVATION: WED is a simple, easy, and rapid method to protect the wound while also inhibiting infection. It is activated by a moist environment and the electrical field induces transient and micromolar amounts of superoxide anion radicals that will prevent bacterial growth. CONCLUSION: WED decreased biofilm infection better compared with SoC. The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04079998. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2024-01-01 2023-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10654645/ /pubmed/36855334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0007 Text en © Rodney K. Chan et al., 2024; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technology Advances Chan, Rodney K. Nuutila, Kristo Mathew-Steiner, Shomita S. Diaz, Victoria Anselmo, Kristin Batchinsky, Maria Carlsson, Anders Ghosh, Nandini Sen, Chandan K. Roy, Sashwati A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Fabric-Based Wireless Electroceutical Dressing Compared to Standard-of-Care Treatment Against Acute Trauma and Burn Wound Biofilm Infection |
title | A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Fabric-Based Wireless Electroceutical Dressing Compared to Standard-of-Care Treatment Against Acute Trauma and Burn Wound Biofilm Infection |
title_full | A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Fabric-Based Wireless Electroceutical Dressing Compared to Standard-of-Care Treatment Against Acute Trauma and Burn Wound Biofilm Infection |
title_fullStr | A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Fabric-Based Wireless Electroceutical Dressing Compared to Standard-of-Care Treatment Against Acute Trauma and Burn Wound Biofilm Infection |
title_full_unstemmed | A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Fabric-Based Wireless Electroceutical Dressing Compared to Standard-of-Care Treatment Against Acute Trauma and Burn Wound Biofilm Infection |
title_short | A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Fabric-Based Wireless Electroceutical Dressing Compared to Standard-of-Care Treatment Against Acute Trauma and Burn Wound Biofilm Infection |
title_sort | prospective, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the effectiveness of a fabric-based wireless electroceutical dressing compared to standard-of-care treatment against acute trauma and burn wound biofilm infection |
topic | Technology Advances |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36855334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chanrodneyk aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT nuutilakristo aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT mathewsteinershomitas aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT diazvictoria aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT anselmokristin aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT batchinskymaria aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT carlssonanders aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT ghoshnandini aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT senchandank aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT roysashwati aprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT chanrodneyk prospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT nuutilakristo prospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT mathewsteinershomitas prospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT diazvictoria prospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT anselmokristin prospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT batchinskymaria prospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT carlssonanders prospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT ghoshnandini prospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT senchandank prospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection AT roysashwati prospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofafabricbasedwirelesselectroceuticaldressingcomparedtostandardofcaretreatmentagainstacutetraumaandburnwoundbiofilminfection |