Cargando…

Unsafe care in residential settings for older adults: a content analysis of accreditation reports

Residents of aged care services can experience safety incidents resulting in preventable serious harm. Accreditation is a commonly used strategy to improve the quality of care; however, narrative information within accreditation reports is not generally analysed as a source of safety information to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hibbert, Peter D, Ash, Ruby, Molloy, Charlotte J, Westbrook, Johanna, Cameron, Ian D, Carson-Stevens, Andrew, Gray, Leonard C, Reed, Richard L, Kitson, Alison, Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37795694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzad085
_version_ 1785136680342126592
author Hibbert, Peter D
Ash, Ruby
Molloy, Charlotte J
Westbrook, Johanna
Cameron, Ian D
Carson-Stevens, Andrew
Gray, Leonard C
Reed, Richard L
Kitson, Alison
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_facet Hibbert, Peter D
Ash, Ruby
Molloy, Charlotte J
Westbrook, Johanna
Cameron, Ian D
Carson-Stevens, Andrew
Gray, Leonard C
Reed, Richard L
Kitson, Alison
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_sort Hibbert, Peter D
collection PubMed
description Residents of aged care services can experience safety incidents resulting in preventable serious harm. Accreditation is a commonly used strategy to improve the quality of care; however, narrative information within accreditation reports is not generally analysed as a source of safety information to inform learning. In Australia, the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (ACQSC), the sector regulator, undertakes over 500 accreditation assessments of residential aged care services against eight national standards every year. From these assessments, the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission generates detailed Site Audit Reports. In over one-third (37%) of Site Audit Reports, standards relating to Personal and Clinical Care (Standard 3) are not being met. The aim of this study was to identify the types of resident Safety Risks that relate to Personal and Clinical Care Standards not being met during accreditation or re-accreditation. These data could inform priority setting at policy, regulatory, and service levels. An analytical framework was developed based on the World Health Organization’s International Classification for Patient Safety and other fields including Clinical Issue (the issue related to the incident impacting the resident, e.g. wound/skin or pain). Information relating to safety incidents in the Site Audit Reports was extracted, and a content analysis undertaken using the analytical framework. Clinical Issue and the International Classification for Patient Safety–based classification were combined to describe a clinically intuitive category (‘Safety Risks’) to describe ways in which residents could experience unsafe care, e.g. diagnosis/assessment of pain. The resulting data were descriptively analysed. The analysis included 65 Site Audit Reports that were undertaken between September 2020 and March 2021. There were 2267 incidents identified and classified into 274 types of resident Safety Risks. The 12 most frequently occurring Safety Risks account for only 32.3% of all incidents. Relatively frequently occurring Safety Risks were organisation management of infection control; diagnosis/assessment of pain, restraint, resident behaviours, and falls; and multiple stages of wounds/skin management, e.g. diagnosis/assessment, documentation, treatment, and deterioration. The analysis has shown that accreditation reports contain valuable data that may inform prioritization of resident Safety Risks in the Australian residential aged care sector. A large number of low-frequency resident Safety Risks were detected in the accreditation reports. To address these, organizations may use implementation science approaches to facilitate evidence-based strategies to improve the quality of care delivered to residents. Improving the aged care workforces’ clinical skills base may address some of the Safety Risks associated with diagnosis/assessment and wound management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10654691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106546912023-10-26 Unsafe care in residential settings for older adults: a content analysis of accreditation reports Hibbert, Peter D Ash, Ruby Molloy, Charlotte J Westbrook, Johanna Cameron, Ian D Carson-Stevens, Andrew Gray, Leonard C Reed, Richard L Kitson, Alison Braithwaite, Jeffrey Int J Qual Health Care Original Research Article Residents of aged care services can experience safety incidents resulting in preventable serious harm. Accreditation is a commonly used strategy to improve the quality of care; however, narrative information within accreditation reports is not generally analysed as a source of safety information to inform learning. In Australia, the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (ACQSC), the sector regulator, undertakes over 500 accreditation assessments of residential aged care services against eight national standards every year. From these assessments, the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission generates detailed Site Audit Reports. In over one-third (37%) of Site Audit Reports, standards relating to Personal and Clinical Care (Standard 3) are not being met. The aim of this study was to identify the types of resident Safety Risks that relate to Personal and Clinical Care Standards not being met during accreditation or re-accreditation. These data could inform priority setting at policy, regulatory, and service levels. An analytical framework was developed based on the World Health Organization’s International Classification for Patient Safety and other fields including Clinical Issue (the issue related to the incident impacting the resident, e.g. wound/skin or pain). Information relating to safety incidents in the Site Audit Reports was extracted, and a content analysis undertaken using the analytical framework. Clinical Issue and the International Classification for Patient Safety–based classification were combined to describe a clinically intuitive category (‘Safety Risks’) to describe ways in which residents could experience unsafe care, e.g. diagnosis/assessment of pain. The resulting data were descriptively analysed. The analysis included 65 Site Audit Reports that were undertaken between September 2020 and March 2021. There were 2267 incidents identified and classified into 274 types of resident Safety Risks. The 12 most frequently occurring Safety Risks account for only 32.3% of all incidents. Relatively frequently occurring Safety Risks were organisation management of infection control; diagnosis/assessment of pain, restraint, resident behaviours, and falls; and multiple stages of wounds/skin management, e.g. diagnosis/assessment, documentation, treatment, and deterioration. The analysis has shown that accreditation reports contain valuable data that may inform prioritization of resident Safety Risks in the Australian residential aged care sector. A large number of low-frequency resident Safety Risks were detected in the accreditation reports. To address these, organizations may use implementation science approaches to facilitate evidence-based strategies to improve the quality of care delivered to residents. Improving the aged care workforces’ clinical skills base may address some of the Safety Risks associated with diagnosis/assessment and wound management. Oxford University Press 2023-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10654691/ /pubmed/37795694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzad085 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Hibbert, Peter D
Ash, Ruby
Molloy, Charlotte J
Westbrook, Johanna
Cameron, Ian D
Carson-Stevens, Andrew
Gray, Leonard C
Reed, Richard L
Kitson, Alison
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Unsafe care in residential settings for older adults: a content analysis of accreditation reports
title Unsafe care in residential settings for older adults: a content analysis of accreditation reports
title_full Unsafe care in residential settings for older adults: a content analysis of accreditation reports
title_fullStr Unsafe care in residential settings for older adults: a content analysis of accreditation reports
title_full_unstemmed Unsafe care in residential settings for older adults: a content analysis of accreditation reports
title_short Unsafe care in residential settings for older adults: a content analysis of accreditation reports
title_sort unsafe care in residential settings for older adults: a content analysis of accreditation reports
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37795694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzad085
work_keys_str_mv AT hibbertpeterd unsafecareinresidentialsettingsforolderadultsacontentanalysisofaccreditationreports
AT ashruby unsafecareinresidentialsettingsforolderadultsacontentanalysisofaccreditationreports
AT molloycharlottej unsafecareinresidentialsettingsforolderadultsacontentanalysisofaccreditationreports
AT westbrookjohanna unsafecareinresidentialsettingsforolderadultsacontentanalysisofaccreditationreports
AT cameroniand unsafecareinresidentialsettingsforolderadultsacontentanalysisofaccreditationreports
AT carsonstevensandrew unsafecareinresidentialsettingsforolderadultsacontentanalysisofaccreditationreports
AT grayleonardc unsafecareinresidentialsettingsforolderadultsacontentanalysisofaccreditationreports
AT reedrichardl unsafecareinresidentialsettingsforolderadultsacontentanalysisofaccreditationreports
AT kitsonalison unsafecareinresidentialsettingsforolderadultsacontentanalysisofaccreditationreports
AT braithwaitejeffrey unsafecareinresidentialsettingsforolderadultsacontentanalysisofaccreditationreports