Cargando…

Reversing frailty in older adults: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Individuals 65 years or older are presumably more susceptible to becoming frail, which increases their risk of multiple adverse health outcomes. Reversing frailty has received recent attention; however, little is understood about what it means and how to achieve it. Thus, the purpose of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolle, Aurélie Tonjock, Lewis, Krystina B., Lalonde, Michelle, Backman, Chantal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37978444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04309-y
_version_ 1785147916325748736
author Kolle, Aurélie Tonjock
Lewis, Krystina B.
Lalonde, Michelle
Backman, Chantal
author_facet Kolle, Aurélie Tonjock
Lewis, Krystina B.
Lalonde, Michelle
Backman, Chantal
author_sort Kolle, Aurélie Tonjock
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individuals 65 years or older are presumably more susceptible to becoming frail, which increases their risk of multiple adverse health outcomes. Reversing frailty has received recent attention; however, little is understood about what it means and how to achieve it. Thus, the purpose of this scoping review is to synthesize the evidence regarding the impact of frail-related interventions on older adults living with frailty, identify what interventions resulted in frailty reversal and clarify the concept of reverse frailty. METHODS: We followed Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage scoping review approach and conducted searches in CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science. We hand-searched the reference list of included studies and conducted a grey literature search. Two independent reviewers completed the title, abstract screenings, and full-text review using the eligibility criteria, and independently extracted approximately 10% of the studies. We critically appraised studies using Joanna Briggs critical appraisal checklist/tool, and we used a descriptive and narrative method to synthesize and analyze data. RESULTS: Of 7499 articles, thirty met the criteria and three studies were identified in the references of included studies. Seventeen studies (56.7%) framed frailty as a reversible condition, with 11 studies (36.7%) selecting it as their primary outcome. Reversing frailty varied from either frail to pre-frail, frail to non-frail, and severe to mild frailty. We identified different types of single and multi-component interventions each targeting various domains of frailty. The physical domain was most frequently targeted (n = 32, 97%). Interventions also varied in their frequencies of delivery, intensities, and durations, and targeted participants from different settings, most commonly from community dwellings (n = 23; 69.7%). CONCLUSION: Some studies indicated that it is possible to reverse frailty. However, this depended on how the researchers assessed or measured frailty. The current understanding of reverse frailty is a shift from a frail or severely frail state to at least a pre-frail or mildly frail state. To gain further insight into reversing frailty, we recommend a concept analysis. Furthermore, we recommend more primary studies considering the participant’s lived experiences to guide intervention delivery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-04309-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10655301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106553012023-11-17 Reversing frailty in older adults: a scoping review Kolle, Aurélie Tonjock Lewis, Krystina B. Lalonde, Michelle Backman, Chantal BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Individuals 65 years or older are presumably more susceptible to becoming frail, which increases their risk of multiple adverse health outcomes. Reversing frailty has received recent attention; however, little is understood about what it means and how to achieve it. Thus, the purpose of this scoping review is to synthesize the evidence regarding the impact of frail-related interventions on older adults living with frailty, identify what interventions resulted in frailty reversal and clarify the concept of reverse frailty. METHODS: We followed Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage scoping review approach and conducted searches in CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science. We hand-searched the reference list of included studies and conducted a grey literature search. Two independent reviewers completed the title, abstract screenings, and full-text review using the eligibility criteria, and independently extracted approximately 10% of the studies. We critically appraised studies using Joanna Briggs critical appraisal checklist/tool, and we used a descriptive and narrative method to synthesize and analyze data. RESULTS: Of 7499 articles, thirty met the criteria and three studies were identified in the references of included studies. Seventeen studies (56.7%) framed frailty as a reversible condition, with 11 studies (36.7%) selecting it as their primary outcome. Reversing frailty varied from either frail to pre-frail, frail to non-frail, and severe to mild frailty. We identified different types of single and multi-component interventions each targeting various domains of frailty. The physical domain was most frequently targeted (n = 32, 97%). Interventions also varied in their frequencies of delivery, intensities, and durations, and targeted participants from different settings, most commonly from community dwellings (n = 23; 69.7%). CONCLUSION: Some studies indicated that it is possible to reverse frailty. However, this depended on how the researchers assessed or measured frailty. The current understanding of reverse frailty is a shift from a frail or severely frail state to at least a pre-frail or mildly frail state. To gain further insight into reversing frailty, we recommend a concept analysis. Furthermore, we recommend more primary studies considering the participant’s lived experiences to guide intervention delivery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-04309-y. BioMed Central 2023-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10655301/ /pubmed/37978444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04309-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kolle, Aurélie Tonjock
Lewis, Krystina B.
Lalonde, Michelle
Backman, Chantal
Reversing frailty in older adults: a scoping review
title Reversing frailty in older adults: a scoping review
title_full Reversing frailty in older adults: a scoping review
title_fullStr Reversing frailty in older adults: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Reversing frailty in older adults: a scoping review
title_short Reversing frailty in older adults: a scoping review
title_sort reversing frailty in older adults: a scoping review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37978444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04309-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kolleaurelietonjock reversingfrailtyinolderadultsascopingreview
AT lewiskrystinab reversingfrailtyinolderadultsascopingreview
AT lalondemichelle reversingfrailtyinolderadultsascopingreview
AT backmanchantal reversingfrailtyinolderadultsascopingreview