Cargando…

Objections to assisted dying within institutions: systemic solutions for rapprochement

In this Matters Arising article, we outline how the recent article “The impact on patients of objections by institutions to assisted dying: a qualitative study of family caregivers’ perceptions” (White et al., 2023 Mar 13;24(1):22) informed Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD) implementation in our large...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peisah, Carmelle, Sheppard, Adrianna, Leung, Kelvin CY
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37974178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00981-2
_version_ 1785147922192531456
author Peisah, Carmelle
Sheppard, Adrianna
Leung, Kelvin CY
author_facet Peisah, Carmelle
Sheppard, Adrianna
Leung, Kelvin CY
author_sort Peisah, Carmelle
collection PubMed
description In this Matters Arising article, we outline how the recent article “The impact on patients of objections by institutions to assisted dying: a qualitative study of family caregivers’ perceptions” (White et al., 2023 Mar 13;24(1):22) informed Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD) implementation in our large Australian public health setting, where objections do not emanate from, but within, the institution. In reporting the harms to patients and caregivers created by institutional objection, White et al. provide an evidenced-based road map for potential potholes or risks associated with VAD implementation. We discuss the complexities emerging from the diverse views of health professionals and the ethical tensions arising from such, especially within certain specialties, and how we developed systemic strategies that support patients, caregivers and staff alike. We highlighted the need to shift from “Do you support VAD?“ to “How can we support you as healthcare professionals to integrate VAD into your practice, in a way that complies with the legislation, meets the needs of patients and caregivers, and feels safe and does not compromise your moral stance?“
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10655327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106553272023-11-16 Objections to assisted dying within institutions: systemic solutions for rapprochement Peisah, Carmelle Sheppard, Adrianna Leung, Kelvin CY BMC Med Ethics Matters Arising In this Matters Arising article, we outline how the recent article “The impact on patients of objections by institutions to assisted dying: a qualitative study of family caregivers’ perceptions” (White et al., 2023 Mar 13;24(1):22) informed Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD) implementation in our large Australian public health setting, where objections do not emanate from, but within, the institution. In reporting the harms to patients and caregivers created by institutional objection, White et al. provide an evidenced-based road map for potential potholes or risks associated with VAD implementation. We discuss the complexities emerging from the diverse views of health professionals and the ethical tensions arising from such, especially within certain specialties, and how we developed systemic strategies that support patients, caregivers and staff alike. We highlighted the need to shift from “Do you support VAD?“ to “How can we support you as healthcare professionals to integrate VAD into your practice, in a way that complies with the legislation, meets the needs of patients and caregivers, and feels safe and does not compromise your moral stance?“ BioMed Central 2023-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10655327/ /pubmed/37974178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00981-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Matters Arising
Peisah, Carmelle
Sheppard, Adrianna
Leung, Kelvin CY
Objections to assisted dying within institutions: systemic solutions for rapprochement
title Objections to assisted dying within institutions: systemic solutions for rapprochement
title_full Objections to assisted dying within institutions: systemic solutions for rapprochement
title_fullStr Objections to assisted dying within institutions: systemic solutions for rapprochement
title_full_unstemmed Objections to assisted dying within institutions: systemic solutions for rapprochement
title_short Objections to assisted dying within institutions: systemic solutions for rapprochement
title_sort objections to assisted dying within institutions: systemic solutions for rapprochement
topic Matters Arising
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37974178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00981-2
work_keys_str_mv AT peisahcarmelle objectionstoassisteddyingwithininstitutionssystemicsolutionsforrapprochement
AT sheppardadrianna objectionstoassisteddyingwithininstitutionssystemicsolutionsforrapprochement
AT leungkelvincy objectionstoassisteddyingwithininstitutionssystemicsolutionsforrapprochement