Cargando…

Training in retinoscopy: learning curves using a standardized method

BACKGROUND: Retinoscopy is one of the most effective objective techniques for evaluating refractive status, especially in non-cooperative patients. However, it presents a slow learning curve that often leads to student frustration. With the current Covid-19 pandemic and the need for social isolation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Estay, Antonio M., Plaza-Rosales, Iván, Torres, Hernán R., Cerfogli, Fabiola I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37974128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04750-y
_version_ 1785147956687536128
author Estay, Antonio M.
Plaza-Rosales, Iván
Torres, Hernán R.
Cerfogli, Fabiola I.
author_facet Estay, Antonio M.
Plaza-Rosales, Iván
Torres, Hernán R.
Cerfogli, Fabiola I.
author_sort Estay, Antonio M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Retinoscopy is one of the most effective objective techniques for evaluating refractive status, especially in non-cooperative patients. However, it presents a slow learning curve that often leads to student frustration. With the current Covid-19 pandemic and the need for social isolation, clinical education based on simulation has become more relevant. Therefore, we implemented retinoscopy laboratories and learning protocols to reduce student stress and learning time. METHODS: We conducted a study to evaluate the retinoscopy learning curve using a new training protocol proposal. One hundred trainees were assessed in four stages, corresponding to 08, 12, 16, and 20 hours of training. Six different refractive defects were used trying to reproduce frequent conditions of care. The time spent on the assessment was not considered as additional training time. To analyze the data, we used non-parametric statistics and linear regression to assess the variables associated with training time and performance rate. RESULTS: The mean performance score at 08 hrs was 32.49% (±16.69 SD); at 12 hrs was 59.75% (±18.80 SD); at 16 hrs was 70.83% (±18.53 SD) and at 20 hrs was 84.26% (±13.18 SD). Performance at 12 hrs was significative higher than 08 hrs of training, but did not show significant differences with the performance rate at 16 and 20 hrs. We found a strong positive correlation between performance and training time in retinoscopy (R = 0.9773, CI: 0.2678 - 0.9995 p = 0.0227). CONCLUSION: This study showed that an increasing number of hours of practice positively correlates with performance in retinoscopy. The elaboration of a protocol and standardization of performance per hour also allowed us to estimate that a minimum of 13.4 hrs of practice is required to achieve 60% performance. Using the resulting formula, it is possible to determine the number of hours of retinoscopy practice are necessary to reach a certain level of performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10655477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106554772023-11-16 Training in retinoscopy: learning curves using a standardized method Estay, Antonio M. Plaza-Rosales, Iván Torres, Hernán R. Cerfogli, Fabiola I. BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Retinoscopy is one of the most effective objective techniques for evaluating refractive status, especially in non-cooperative patients. However, it presents a slow learning curve that often leads to student frustration. With the current Covid-19 pandemic and the need for social isolation, clinical education based on simulation has become more relevant. Therefore, we implemented retinoscopy laboratories and learning protocols to reduce student stress and learning time. METHODS: We conducted a study to evaluate the retinoscopy learning curve using a new training protocol proposal. One hundred trainees were assessed in four stages, corresponding to 08, 12, 16, and 20 hours of training. Six different refractive defects were used trying to reproduce frequent conditions of care. The time spent on the assessment was not considered as additional training time. To analyze the data, we used non-parametric statistics and linear regression to assess the variables associated with training time and performance rate. RESULTS: The mean performance score at 08 hrs was 32.49% (±16.69 SD); at 12 hrs was 59.75% (±18.80 SD); at 16 hrs was 70.83% (±18.53 SD) and at 20 hrs was 84.26% (±13.18 SD). Performance at 12 hrs was significative higher than 08 hrs of training, but did not show significant differences with the performance rate at 16 and 20 hrs. We found a strong positive correlation between performance and training time in retinoscopy (R = 0.9773, CI: 0.2678 - 0.9995 p = 0.0227). CONCLUSION: This study showed that an increasing number of hours of practice positively correlates with performance in retinoscopy. The elaboration of a protocol and standardization of performance per hour also allowed us to estimate that a minimum of 13.4 hrs of practice is required to achieve 60% performance. Using the resulting formula, it is possible to determine the number of hours of retinoscopy practice are necessary to reach a certain level of performance. BioMed Central 2023-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10655477/ /pubmed/37974128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04750-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Estay, Antonio M.
Plaza-Rosales, Iván
Torres, Hernán R.
Cerfogli, Fabiola I.
Training in retinoscopy: learning curves using a standardized method
title Training in retinoscopy: learning curves using a standardized method
title_full Training in retinoscopy: learning curves using a standardized method
title_fullStr Training in retinoscopy: learning curves using a standardized method
title_full_unstemmed Training in retinoscopy: learning curves using a standardized method
title_short Training in retinoscopy: learning curves using a standardized method
title_sort training in retinoscopy: learning curves using a standardized method
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37974128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04750-y
work_keys_str_mv AT estayantoniom traininginretinoscopylearningcurvesusingastandardizedmethod
AT plazarosalesivan traininginretinoscopylearningcurvesusingastandardizedmethod
AT torreshernanr traininginretinoscopylearningcurvesusingastandardizedmethod
AT cerfoglifabiolai traininginretinoscopylearningcurvesusingastandardizedmethod