Cargando…
Most patients with an increased risk for sepsis-related morbidity or death do not recognize sepsis as a medical emergency: results of a survey study using case vignettes
BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a medical emergency with potentially life-threatening consequences. Patients play a crucial role in preventing and recognizing sepsis at an early stage. The understanding of risk groups’ sepsis knowledge and their ability to use this knowledge to recognize sepsis as an emergenc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37978408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04733-x |
_version_ | 1785147959480942592 |
---|---|
author | Born, Sebastian Fleischmann-Struzek, Carolin Abels, Wiltrud Piedmont, Silke Neugebauer, Edmund Reinhart, Konrad Toubekis, Evjenia Wegwarth, Odette Schwarzkopf, Daniel |
author_facet | Born, Sebastian Fleischmann-Struzek, Carolin Abels, Wiltrud Piedmont, Silke Neugebauer, Edmund Reinhart, Konrad Toubekis, Evjenia Wegwarth, Odette Schwarzkopf, Daniel |
author_sort | Born, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a medical emergency with potentially life-threatening consequences. Patients play a crucial role in preventing and recognizing sepsis at an early stage. The understanding of risk groups’ sepsis knowledge and their ability to use this knowledge to recognize sepsis as an emergency is incomplete. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in Germany and included a sample of 740 persons stratified by age (< 60 years, ≥ 60 years), specific chronic diseases (e.g. diabetes, chronic diseases, cancer), and region (Berlin/Brandenburg vs. other federal states of Germany). Standardized questionnaires were administered by a market research institute through online, telephone, or face-to-face methods. We assessed sepsis knowledge through a series of questions and the ability to recognize sepsis as an emergency through five case vignettes. To identify predictors of sepsis knowledge and the ability to recognize sepsis as a medical emergency, we conducted multiple linear regressions. RESULTS: Of the 36 items on sepsis knowledge, participants answered less than 50 per cent correctly (mean 44.1%; standard deviation (SD) 20.1). Most patients knew that sepsis is a defensive host response to infection (75.9%), but only 30.8% knew that vaccination can prevent infections that lead to sepsis. Across the five vignettes, participants identified sepsis as an emergency in only 1.33 of all cases on average (SD = 1.27). Sepsis knowledge was higher among participants who were older, female, and more highly educated and who reported more extensive health information seeking behaviour. The ability to recognize sepsis as an emergency was higher among younger participants, participants without chronic diseases, and participants with higher health literacy, but it was not significantly associated with sepsis knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Risk groups showed low levels of knowledge regarding the preventive importance of vaccination and a low ability to recognize sepsis as a medical emergency. Higher levels of sepsis knowledge alone were not sufficient to improve the ability to identify sepsis as a medical emergency. It is crucial to develop effective educational strategies—especially for persons with lower education levels and infrequent health information seeking behaviour—that not only transfer but also facilitate the choice of appropriate actions, such as seeking timely emergency care. Trial registration: DRKS00024561. Registered 9 March 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04733-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10655489 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106554892023-11-17 Most patients with an increased risk for sepsis-related morbidity or death do not recognize sepsis as a medical emergency: results of a survey study using case vignettes Born, Sebastian Fleischmann-Struzek, Carolin Abels, Wiltrud Piedmont, Silke Neugebauer, Edmund Reinhart, Konrad Toubekis, Evjenia Wegwarth, Odette Schwarzkopf, Daniel Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a medical emergency with potentially life-threatening consequences. Patients play a crucial role in preventing and recognizing sepsis at an early stage. The understanding of risk groups’ sepsis knowledge and their ability to use this knowledge to recognize sepsis as an emergency is incomplete. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in Germany and included a sample of 740 persons stratified by age (< 60 years, ≥ 60 years), specific chronic diseases (e.g. diabetes, chronic diseases, cancer), and region (Berlin/Brandenburg vs. other federal states of Germany). Standardized questionnaires were administered by a market research institute through online, telephone, or face-to-face methods. We assessed sepsis knowledge through a series of questions and the ability to recognize sepsis as an emergency through five case vignettes. To identify predictors of sepsis knowledge and the ability to recognize sepsis as a medical emergency, we conducted multiple linear regressions. RESULTS: Of the 36 items on sepsis knowledge, participants answered less than 50 per cent correctly (mean 44.1%; standard deviation (SD) 20.1). Most patients knew that sepsis is a defensive host response to infection (75.9%), but only 30.8% knew that vaccination can prevent infections that lead to sepsis. Across the five vignettes, participants identified sepsis as an emergency in only 1.33 of all cases on average (SD = 1.27). Sepsis knowledge was higher among participants who were older, female, and more highly educated and who reported more extensive health information seeking behaviour. The ability to recognize sepsis as an emergency was higher among younger participants, participants without chronic diseases, and participants with higher health literacy, but it was not significantly associated with sepsis knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Risk groups showed low levels of knowledge regarding the preventive importance of vaccination and a low ability to recognize sepsis as a medical emergency. Higher levels of sepsis knowledge alone were not sufficient to improve the ability to identify sepsis as a medical emergency. It is crucial to develop effective educational strategies—especially for persons with lower education levels and infrequent health information seeking behaviour—that not only transfer but also facilitate the choice of appropriate actions, such as seeking timely emergency care. Trial registration: DRKS00024561. Registered 9 March 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04733-x. BioMed Central 2023-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10655489/ /pubmed/37978408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04733-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Born, Sebastian Fleischmann-Struzek, Carolin Abels, Wiltrud Piedmont, Silke Neugebauer, Edmund Reinhart, Konrad Toubekis, Evjenia Wegwarth, Odette Schwarzkopf, Daniel Most patients with an increased risk for sepsis-related morbidity or death do not recognize sepsis as a medical emergency: results of a survey study using case vignettes |
title | Most patients with an increased risk for sepsis-related morbidity or death do not recognize sepsis as a medical emergency: results of a survey study using case vignettes |
title_full | Most patients with an increased risk for sepsis-related morbidity or death do not recognize sepsis as a medical emergency: results of a survey study using case vignettes |
title_fullStr | Most patients with an increased risk for sepsis-related morbidity or death do not recognize sepsis as a medical emergency: results of a survey study using case vignettes |
title_full_unstemmed | Most patients with an increased risk for sepsis-related morbidity or death do not recognize sepsis as a medical emergency: results of a survey study using case vignettes |
title_short | Most patients with an increased risk for sepsis-related morbidity or death do not recognize sepsis as a medical emergency: results of a survey study using case vignettes |
title_sort | most patients with an increased risk for sepsis-related morbidity or death do not recognize sepsis as a medical emergency: results of a survey study using case vignettes |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37978408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04733-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bornsebastian mostpatientswithanincreasedriskforsepsisrelatedmorbidityordeathdonotrecognizesepsisasamedicalemergencyresultsofasurveystudyusingcasevignettes AT fleischmannstruzekcarolin mostpatientswithanincreasedriskforsepsisrelatedmorbidityordeathdonotrecognizesepsisasamedicalemergencyresultsofasurveystudyusingcasevignettes AT abelswiltrud mostpatientswithanincreasedriskforsepsisrelatedmorbidityordeathdonotrecognizesepsisasamedicalemergencyresultsofasurveystudyusingcasevignettes AT piedmontsilke mostpatientswithanincreasedriskforsepsisrelatedmorbidityordeathdonotrecognizesepsisasamedicalemergencyresultsofasurveystudyusingcasevignettes AT neugebaueredmund mostpatientswithanincreasedriskforsepsisrelatedmorbidityordeathdonotrecognizesepsisasamedicalemergencyresultsofasurveystudyusingcasevignettes AT reinhartkonrad mostpatientswithanincreasedriskforsepsisrelatedmorbidityordeathdonotrecognizesepsisasamedicalemergencyresultsofasurveystudyusingcasevignettes AT toubekisevjenia mostpatientswithanincreasedriskforsepsisrelatedmorbidityordeathdonotrecognizesepsisasamedicalemergencyresultsofasurveystudyusingcasevignettes AT wegwarthodette mostpatientswithanincreasedriskforsepsisrelatedmorbidityordeathdonotrecognizesepsisasamedicalemergencyresultsofasurveystudyusingcasevignettes AT schwarzkopfdaniel mostpatientswithanincreasedriskforsepsisrelatedmorbidityordeathdonotrecognizesepsisasamedicalemergencyresultsofasurveystudyusingcasevignettes |