Cargando…

Trend analysis of COVID-19 mis/disinformation narratives–A 3-year study

To tackle the COVID-19 infodemic, we analysed 58,625 articles from 460 unverified sources, that is, sources that were indicated by fact checkers and other mis/disinformation experts as frequently spreading mis/disinformation, covering the period from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2022. Our aim was t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kotseva, Bonka, Vianini, Irene, Nikolaidis, Nikolaos, Faggiani, Nicolò, Potapova, Kristina, Gasparro, Caroline, Steiner, Yaniv, Scornavacche, Jessica, Jacquet, Guillaume, Dragu, Vlad, della Rocca, Leonida, Bucci, Stefano, Podavini, Aldo, Verile, Marco, Macmillan, Charles, Linge, Jens P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37976242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291423
_version_ 1785148002606776320
author Kotseva, Bonka
Vianini, Irene
Nikolaidis, Nikolaos
Faggiani, Nicolò
Potapova, Kristina
Gasparro, Caroline
Steiner, Yaniv
Scornavacche, Jessica
Jacquet, Guillaume
Dragu, Vlad
della Rocca, Leonida
Bucci, Stefano
Podavini, Aldo
Verile, Marco
Macmillan, Charles
Linge, Jens P.
author_facet Kotseva, Bonka
Vianini, Irene
Nikolaidis, Nikolaos
Faggiani, Nicolò
Potapova, Kristina
Gasparro, Caroline
Steiner, Yaniv
Scornavacche, Jessica
Jacquet, Guillaume
Dragu, Vlad
della Rocca, Leonida
Bucci, Stefano
Podavini, Aldo
Verile, Marco
Macmillan, Charles
Linge, Jens P.
author_sort Kotseva, Bonka
collection PubMed
description To tackle the COVID-19 infodemic, we analysed 58,625 articles from 460 unverified sources, that is, sources that were indicated by fact checkers and other mis/disinformation experts as frequently spreading mis/disinformation, covering the period from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2022. Our aim was to identify the main narratives of COVID-19 mis/disinformation, develop a codebook, automate the process of narrative classification by training an automatic classifier, and analyse the spread of narratives over time and across countries. Articles were retrieved with a customised version of the Europe Media Monitor (EMM) processing chain providing a stream of text items. Machine translation was employed to automatically translate non-English text to English and clustering was carried out to group similar articles. A multi-level codebook of COVID-19 mis/disinformation narratives was developed following an inductive approach; a transformer-based model was developed to classify all text items according to the codebook. Using the transformer-based model, we identified 12 supernarratives that evolved over the three years studied. The analysis shows that there are often real events behind mis/disinformation trends, which unverified sources misrepresent or take out of context. We established a process that allows for near real-time monitoring of COVID-19 mis/disinformation. This experience will be useful to analyse mis/disinformation about other topics, such as climate change, migration, and geopolitical developments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10655972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106559722023-11-17 Trend analysis of COVID-19 mis/disinformation narratives–A 3-year study Kotseva, Bonka Vianini, Irene Nikolaidis, Nikolaos Faggiani, Nicolò Potapova, Kristina Gasparro, Caroline Steiner, Yaniv Scornavacche, Jessica Jacquet, Guillaume Dragu, Vlad della Rocca, Leonida Bucci, Stefano Podavini, Aldo Verile, Marco Macmillan, Charles Linge, Jens P. PLoS One Research Article To tackle the COVID-19 infodemic, we analysed 58,625 articles from 460 unverified sources, that is, sources that were indicated by fact checkers and other mis/disinformation experts as frequently spreading mis/disinformation, covering the period from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2022. Our aim was to identify the main narratives of COVID-19 mis/disinformation, develop a codebook, automate the process of narrative classification by training an automatic classifier, and analyse the spread of narratives over time and across countries. Articles were retrieved with a customised version of the Europe Media Monitor (EMM) processing chain providing a stream of text items. Machine translation was employed to automatically translate non-English text to English and clustering was carried out to group similar articles. A multi-level codebook of COVID-19 mis/disinformation narratives was developed following an inductive approach; a transformer-based model was developed to classify all text items according to the codebook. Using the transformer-based model, we identified 12 supernarratives that evolved over the three years studied. The analysis shows that there are often real events behind mis/disinformation trends, which unverified sources misrepresent or take out of context. We established a process that allows for near real-time monitoring of COVID-19 mis/disinformation. This experience will be useful to analyse mis/disinformation about other topics, such as climate change, migration, and geopolitical developments. Public Library of Science 2023-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10655972/ /pubmed/37976242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291423 Text en © 2023 Kotseva et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kotseva, Bonka
Vianini, Irene
Nikolaidis, Nikolaos
Faggiani, Nicolò
Potapova, Kristina
Gasparro, Caroline
Steiner, Yaniv
Scornavacche, Jessica
Jacquet, Guillaume
Dragu, Vlad
della Rocca, Leonida
Bucci, Stefano
Podavini, Aldo
Verile, Marco
Macmillan, Charles
Linge, Jens P.
Trend analysis of COVID-19 mis/disinformation narratives–A 3-year study
title Trend analysis of COVID-19 mis/disinformation narratives–A 3-year study
title_full Trend analysis of COVID-19 mis/disinformation narratives–A 3-year study
title_fullStr Trend analysis of COVID-19 mis/disinformation narratives–A 3-year study
title_full_unstemmed Trend analysis of COVID-19 mis/disinformation narratives–A 3-year study
title_short Trend analysis of COVID-19 mis/disinformation narratives–A 3-year study
title_sort trend analysis of covid-19 mis/disinformation narratives–a 3-year study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37976242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291423
work_keys_str_mv AT kotsevabonka trendanalysisofcovid19misdisinformationnarrativesa3yearstudy
AT vianiniirene trendanalysisofcovid19misdisinformationnarrativesa3yearstudy
AT nikolaidisnikolaos trendanalysisofcovid19misdisinformationnarrativesa3yearstudy
AT faggianinicolo trendanalysisofcovid19misdisinformationnarrativesa3yearstudy
AT potapovakristina trendanalysisofcovid19misdisinformationnarrativesa3yearstudy
AT gasparrocaroline trendanalysisofcovid19misdisinformationnarrativesa3yearstudy
AT steineryaniv trendanalysisofcovid19misdisinformationnarrativesa3yearstudy
AT scornavacchejessica trendanalysisofcovid19misdisinformationnarrativesa3yearstudy
AT jacquetguillaume trendanalysisofcovid19misdisinformationnarrativesa3yearstudy
AT draguvlad trendanalysisofcovid19misdisinformationnarrativesa3yearstudy
AT dellaroccaleonida trendanalysisofcovid19misdisinformationnarrativesa3yearstudy
AT buccistefano trendanalysisofcovid19misdisinformationnarrativesa3yearstudy
AT podavinialdo trendanalysisofcovid19misdisinformationnarrativesa3yearstudy
AT verilemarco trendanalysisofcovid19misdisinformationnarrativesa3yearstudy
AT macmillancharles trendanalysisofcovid19misdisinformationnarrativesa3yearstudy
AT lingejensp trendanalysisofcovid19misdisinformationnarrativesa3yearstudy