Cargando…
Trend analysis of COVID-19 mis/disinformation narratives–A 3-year study
To tackle the COVID-19 infodemic, we analysed 58,625 articles from 460 unverified sources, that is, sources that were indicated by fact checkers and other mis/disinformation experts as frequently spreading mis/disinformation, covering the period from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2022. Our aim was t...
Autores principales: | Kotseva, Bonka, Vianini, Irene, Nikolaidis, Nikolaos, Faggiani, Nicolò, Potapova, Kristina, Gasparro, Caroline, Steiner, Yaniv, Scornavacche, Jessica, Jacquet, Guillaume, Dragu, Vlad, della Rocca, Leonida, Bucci, Stefano, Podavini, Aldo, Verile, Marco, Macmillan, Charles, Linge, Jens P. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10655972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37976242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291423 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Assessing the credibility of COVID-19 vaccine mis/disinformation in online discussion
por: Savolainen, Reijo
Publicado: (2021) -
A scoping review of COVID-19 online mis/disinformation in Black communities
por: Kemei, Janet, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Quacks vs facts: Regulatory body discipline when clinicians spread COVID-19 mis/disinformation
por: Foong-Reichert, Ai-Leng, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Disinformation: analysis and identification
por: Pathak, Archita, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Online mis/disinformation and vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19: Why we need an eHealth literacy revolution
por: Dib, Fadia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)