Cargando…

“It’s complicated…”: Exploring second stage caesarean sections and reasons for non-performance of assisted vaginal births in Kenya: A mixed methods study

Unnecessary Caesarean Section (CS) can have adverse effects on women and their newborns. Assisted vaginal birth/delivery (AVB/AVD) using a suction device or obstetric forceps is a potential alternative when delays or complications occur in the second stage of labour. Unlike CS, AVB using a suction d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickinson, Fiona M., Allott, Helen, Nyongesa, Paul, Eyinda, Martin, Muchemi, Onesmus M., Karangau, Stephen W., Ogoti, Evans, Shaban, Nassir A., Godia, Pamela, Nyaga, Lucy, Ameh, Charles A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37976293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001495
_version_ 1785148007981776896
author Dickinson, Fiona M.
Allott, Helen
Nyongesa, Paul
Eyinda, Martin
Muchemi, Onesmus M.
Karangau, Stephen W.
Ogoti, Evans
Shaban, Nassir A.
Godia, Pamela
Nyaga, Lucy
Ameh, Charles A.
author_facet Dickinson, Fiona M.
Allott, Helen
Nyongesa, Paul
Eyinda, Martin
Muchemi, Onesmus M.
Karangau, Stephen W.
Ogoti, Evans
Shaban, Nassir A.
Godia, Pamela
Nyaga, Lucy
Ameh, Charles A.
author_sort Dickinson, Fiona M.
collection PubMed
description Unnecessary Caesarean Section (CS) can have adverse effects on women and their newborns. Assisted vaginal birth/delivery (AVB/AVD) using a suction device or obstetric forceps is a potential alternative when delays or complications occur in the second stage of labour. Unlike CS, AVB using a suction device does not require regional or general anaesthesia, can often be performed by midwives, and does not scar the uterus, lowering the risk of maternal mortality and morbidity, in this and subsequent pregnancies. This study examined the appropriateness and outcomes of second stage CS (SSCS), and reasons for low levels of AVB use, in Kenya. Using a mixed methods study design, we reviewed case notes from women having SSCS births and AVB, and conducted key informant interviews with healthcare providers, from 8 purposively selected hospitals in Kenya. Randomly selected SSCS and all AVB case notes were reviewed by a panel of four experienced obstetricians, and appropriateness of the procedure assessed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with obstetricians, medical officers and midwives, and analysed using a thematic approach. Review of 67 SSCS case notes showed 10% might have been conducted as AVBs, with a further 58% unable to be classified due to inadequate/inconsistent record keeping or excessive delay following initial CS decision. Outcomes following SSCS showed perinatal mortality rate of 89.6/1,000 births, with 11% of infants and 9% of mothers experiencing complications. Non-referred cases of AVB showed good outcomes. The findings of the 20 interviews explored the experience and confidence of healthcare providers in performing AVBs, and adequacy of the training they received. Key reasons for non-performance included lack of functioning equipment, lack of trained staff or their rotation to other departments. Reasons for non-performance of AVB were complex and often multiple. Any solutions to these problems will need to address various local, regional and national issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10656000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106560002023-11-17 “It’s complicated…”: Exploring second stage caesarean sections and reasons for non-performance of assisted vaginal births in Kenya: A mixed methods study Dickinson, Fiona M. Allott, Helen Nyongesa, Paul Eyinda, Martin Muchemi, Onesmus M. Karangau, Stephen W. Ogoti, Evans Shaban, Nassir A. Godia, Pamela Nyaga, Lucy Ameh, Charles A. PLOS Glob Public Health Research Article Unnecessary Caesarean Section (CS) can have adverse effects on women and their newborns. Assisted vaginal birth/delivery (AVB/AVD) using a suction device or obstetric forceps is a potential alternative when delays or complications occur in the second stage of labour. Unlike CS, AVB using a suction device does not require regional or general anaesthesia, can often be performed by midwives, and does not scar the uterus, lowering the risk of maternal mortality and morbidity, in this and subsequent pregnancies. This study examined the appropriateness and outcomes of second stage CS (SSCS), and reasons for low levels of AVB use, in Kenya. Using a mixed methods study design, we reviewed case notes from women having SSCS births and AVB, and conducted key informant interviews with healthcare providers, from 8 purposively selected hospitals in Kenya. Randomly selected SSCS and all AVB case notes were reviewed by a panel of four experienced obstetricians, and appropriateness of the procedure assessed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with obstetricians, medical officers and midwives, and analysed using a thematic approach. Review of 67 SSCS case notes showed 10% might have been conducted as AVBs, with a further 58% unable to be classified due to inadequate/inconsistent record keeping or excessive delay following initial CS decision. Outcomes following SSCS showed perinatal mortality rate of 89.6/1,000 births, with 11% of infants and 9% of mothers experiencing complications. Non-referred cases of AVB showed good outcomes. The findings of the 20 interviews explored the experience and confidence of healthcare providers in performing AVBs, and adequacy of the training they received. Key reasons for non-performance included lack of functioning equipment, lack of trained staff or their rotation to other departments. Reasons for non-performance of AVB were complex and often multiple. Any solutions to these problems will need to address various local, regional and national issues. Public Library of Science 2023-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10656000/ /pubmed/37976293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001495 Text en © 2023 Dickinson et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dickinson, Fiona M.
Allott, Helen
Nyongesa, Paul
Eyinda, Martin
Muchemi, Onesmus M.
Karangau, Stephen W.
Ogoti, Evans
Shaban, Nassir A.
Godia, Pamela
Nyaga, Lucy
Ameh, Charles A.
“It’s complicated…”: Exploring second stage caesarean sections and reasons for non-performance of assisted vaginal births in Kenya: A mixed methods study
title “It’s complicated…”: Exploring second stage caesarean sections and reasons for non-performance of assisted vaginal births in Kenya: A mixed methods study
title_full “It’s complicated…”: Exploring second stage caesarean sections and reasons for non-performance of assisted vaginal births in Kenya: A mixed methods study
title_fullStr “It’s complicated…”: Exploring second stage caesarean sections and reasons for non-performance of assisted vaginal births in Kenya: A mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed “It’s complicated…”: Exploring second stage caesarean sections and reasons for non-performance of assisted vaginal births in Kenya: A mixed methods study
title_short “It’s complicated…”: Exploring second stage caesarean sections and reasons for non-performance of assisted vaginal births in Kenya: A mixed methods study
title_sort “it’s complicated…”: exploring second stage caesarean sections and reasons for non-performance of assisted vaginal births in kenya: a mixed methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37976293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001495
work_keys_str_mv AT dickinsonfionam itscomplicatedexploringsecondstagecaesareansectionsandreasonsfornonperformanceofassistedvaginalbirthsinkenyaamixedmethodsstudy
AT allotthelen itscomplicatedexploringsecondstagecaesareansectionsandreasonsfornonperformanceofassistedvaginalbirthsinkenyaamixedmethodsstudy
AT nyongesapaul itscomplicatedexploringsecondstagecaesareansectionsandreasonsfornonperformanceofassistedvaginalbirthsinkenyaamixedmethodsstudy
AT eyindamartin itscomplicatedexploringsecondstagecaesareansectionsandreasonsfornonperformanceofassistedvaginalbirthsinkenyaamixedmethodsstudy
AT muchemionesmusm itscomplicatedexploringsecondstagecaesareansectionsandreasonsfornonperformanceofassistedvaginalbirthsinkenyaamixedmethodsstudy
AT karangaustephenw itscomplicatedexploringsecondstagecaesareansectionsandreasonsfornonperformanceofassistedvaginalbirthsinkenyaamixedmethodsstudy
AT ogotievans itscomplicatedexploringsecondstagecaesareansectionsandreasonsfornonperformanceofassistedvaginalbirthsinkenyaamixedmethodsstudy
AT shabannassira itscomplicatedexploringsecondstagecaesareansectionsandreasonsfornonperformanceofassistedvaginalbirthsinkenyaamixedmethodsstudy
AT godiapamela itscomplicatedexploringsecondstagecaesareansectionsandreasonsfornonperformanceofassistedvaginalbirthsinkenyaamixedmethodsstudy
AT nyagalucy itscomplicatedexploringsecondstagecaesareansectionsandreasonsfornonperformanceofassistedvaginalbirthsinkenyaamixedmethodsstudy
AT amehcharlesa itscomplicatedexploringsecondstagecaesareansectionsandreasonsfornonperformanceofassistedvaginalbirthsinkenyaamixedmethodsstudy