Cargando…
Immunotherapy and Its Timing in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment
For patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC), including locally advanced or metastatic BCC not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy, hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHI) vismodegib and sonidegib are approved as first-line systemic treatment. Results from clinical trials highlight that...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mattioli 1885
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37992360 http://dx.doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1304a252 |
_version_ | 1785136948436795392 |
---|---|
author | Dessinioti, Clio Stratigos, Alexander J. |
author_facet | Dessinioti, Clio Stratigos, Alexander J. |
author_sort | Dessinioti, Clio |
collection | PubMed |
description | For patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC), including locally advanced or metastatic BCC not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy, hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHI) vismodegib and sonidegib are approved as first-line systemic treatment. Results from clinical trials highlight that the overall discontinuation rate of HHI treatment varies from 88% to 92% with vismodegib and is approximately 92% with sonidegib, and half of patients will discontinue HHI after approximately 8 to 12 months. The main factors weighing in on the decision to discontinue HHI include efficacy (tumor response), adverse events and patient decision. In clinical practice, some of the patients that stop HHI may be re-evaluated if the tumor becomes amenable to surgery, or restart HHI at a later time, while others will need to switch to immunotherapy, depending on the reasons for HHI discontinuation. In this review, we revisit the therapeutic decisions considering a switch from HHI to immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 agent cemiplimab and we highlight the place of cemiplimab in the therapeutic ladder for patients with advanced BCC. We discuss the evidence on the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 agents as second-line systemic monotherapy, or in combination with other treatments, and the emergence of checkpoint immunotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10656142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Mattioli 1885 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106561422023-10-01 Immunotherapy and Its Timing in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment Dessinioti, Clio Stratigos, Alexander J. Dermatol Pract Concept Review For patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC), including locally advanced or metastatic BCC not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy, hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHI) vismodegib and sonidegib are approved as first-line systemic treatment. Results from clinical trials highlight that the overall discontinuation rate of HHI treatment varies from 88% to 92% with vismodegib and is approximately 92% with sonidegib, and half of patients will discontinue HHI after approximately 8 to 12 months. The main factors weighing in on the decision to discontinue HHI include efficacy (tumor response), adverse events and patient decision. In clinical practice, some of the patients that stop HHI may be re-evaluated if the tumor becomes amenable to surgery, or restart HHI at a later time, while others will need to switch to immunotherapy, depending on the reasons for HHI discontinuation. In this review, we revisit the therapeutic decisions considering a switch from HHI to immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 agent cemiplimab and we highlight the place of cemiplimab in the therapeutic ladder for patients with advanced BCC. We discuss the evidence on the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 agents as second-line systemic monotherapy, or in combination with other treatments, and the emergence of checkpoint immunotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment. Mattioli 1885 2023-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10656142/ /pubmed/37992360 http://dx.doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1304a252 Text en ©2023 Dessinioti et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (BY-NC-4.0), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Dessinioti, Clio Stratigos, Alexander J. Immunotherapy and Its Timing in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment |
title | Immunotherapy and Its Timing in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment |
title_full | Immunotherapy and Its Timing in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment |
title_fullStr | Immunotherapy and Its Timing in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Immunotherapy and Its Timing in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment |
title_short | Immunotherapy and Its Timing in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment |
title_sort | immunotherapy and its timing in advanced basal cell carcinoma treatment |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37992360 http://dx.doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1304a252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dessinioticlio immunotherapyanditstiminginadvancedbasalcellcarcinomatreatment AT stratigosalexanderj immunotherapyanditstiminginadvancedbasalcellcarcinomatreatment |