Cargando…
Canadian organ donation organizations’ donor audit processes: an environmental scan
PURPOSE: Deceased donor audits (DAs) allow organ donation and transplantation systems to measure and analyze missed donation opportunities (MDOs). Missed donation opportunities can harm both patients/families denied the opportunity to donate and patients on transplant waitlists denied access to life...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37853277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02584-2 |
_version_ | 1785136985737789440 |
---|---|
author | Zavalkoff, Samara O’Donnell, Shauna Karam, Isabela F. Lalani, Jehan Shemie, Sam D. |
author_facet | Zavalkoff, Samara O’Donnell, Shauna Karam, Isabela F. Lalani, Jehan Shemie, Sam D. |
author_sort | Zavalkoff, Samara |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Deceased donor audits (DAs) allow organ donation and transplantation systems to measure and analyze missed donation opportunities (MDOs). Missed donation opportunities can harm both patients/families denied the opportunity to donate and patients on transplant waitlists denied access to lifesaving organs. In Canada, there are no national standards for DAs, data analysis, nor accountability processes surrounding MDOs. Understanding DA current practice in each jurisdicton would facilitate developing a national strategy for DAs. METHOD: All provincial organ donation organizations (ODOs) were invited to participate in an environmental scan (ES) of current DA practices. The two ES phases were an electronic survey followed by semistructured interviews. We collected information about the objectives, frequency, scope, data collection methodology, resources required, definitions/metrics used, and process for reporting outcomes. RESULTS: All eleven ODOs participated in both phases of the ES (July and October 2019). The primary purposes for conducting DAs were to estimate the following: 1) donor potential (5/11, 45%); 2) system performance at the provincial level (3/11, 27%); and 3) system performance at the hospital level (3/11, 27%). Frequency of DAs varied from weekly to annually, depending on the availability of death reports, urban vs rural setting, and staffing. High variability was observed in DA methodology, donor definitions, and metrics across jurisdictions. CONCLUSION: There is significant variability across Canadian ODOs in the methodology, definitions, timeliness, data collection, and reporting of DAs. This underscores the need for a national donor audit strategy to reduce preventable harm from MDOs to patients/families at end of life and those on transplant waitlists. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-023-02584-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10656310 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106563102023-10-18 Canadian organ donation organizations’ donor audit processes: an environmental scan Zavalkoff, Samara O’Donnell, Shauna Karam, Isabela F. Lalani, Jehan Shemie, Sam D. Can J Anaesth Reports of Original Investigations PURPOSE: Deceased donor audits (DAs) allow organ donation and transplantation systems to measure and analyze missed donation opportunities (MDOs). Missed donation opportunities can harm both patients/families denied the opportunity to donate and patients on transplant waitlists denied access to lifesaving organs. In Canada, there are no national standards for DAs, data analysis, nor accountability processes surrounding MDOs. Understanding DA current practice in each jurisdicton would facilitate developing a national strategy for DAs. METHOD: All provincial organ donation organizations (ODOs) were invited to participate in an environmental scan (ES) of current DA practices. The two ES phases were an electronic survey followed by semistructured interviews. We collected information about the objectives, frequency, scope, data collection methodology, resources required, definitions/metrics used, and process for reporting outcomes. RESULTS: All eleven ODOs participated in both phases of the ES (July and October 2019). The primary purposes for conducting DAs were to estimate the following: 1) donor potential (5/11, 45%); 2) system performance at the provincial level (3/11, 27%); and 3) system performance at the hospital level (3/11, 27%). Frequency of DAs varied from weekly to annually, depending on the availability of death reports, urban vs rural setting, and staffing. High variability was observed in DA methodology, donor definitions, and metrics across jurisdictions. CONCLUSION: There is significant variability across Canadian ODOs in the methodology, definitions, timeliness, data collection, and reporting of DAs. This underscores the need for a national donor audit strategy to reduce preventable harm from MDOs to patients/families at end of life and those on transplant waitlists. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-023-02584-2. Springer International Publishing 2023-10-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10656310/ /pubmed/37853277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02584-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Reports of Original Investigations Zavalkoff, Samara O’Donnell, Shauna Karam, Isabela F. Lalani, Jehan Shemie, Sam D. Canadian organ donation organizations’ donor audit processes: an environmental scan |
title | Canadian organ donation organizations’ donor audit processes: an environmental scan |
title_full | Canadian organ donation organizations’ donor audit processes: an environmental scan |
title_fullStr | Canadian organ donation organizations’ donor audit processes: an environmental scan |
title_full_unstemmed | Canadian organ donation organizations’ donor audit processes: an environmental scan |
title_short | Canadian organ donation organizations’ donor audit processes: an environmental scan |
title_sort | canadian organ donation organizations’ donor audit processes: an environmental scan |
topic | Reports of Original Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37853277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02584-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zavalkoffsamara canadianorgandonationorganizationsdonorauditprocessesanenvironmentalscan AT odonnellshauna canadianorgandonationorganizationsdonorauditprocessesanenvironmentalscan AT karamisabelaf canadianorgandonationorganizationsdonorauditprocessesanenvironmentalscan AT lalanijehan canadianorgandonationorganizationsdonorauditprocessesanenvironmentalscan AT shemiesamd canadianorgandonationorganizationsdonorauditprocessesanenvironmentalscan |