Cargando…
DIF Statistical Inference Without Knowing Anchoring Items
Establishing the invariance property of an instrument (e.g., a questionnaire or test) is a key step for establishing its measurement validity. Measurement invariance is typically assessed by differential item functioning (DIF) analysis, i.e., detecting DIF items whose response distribution depends n...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37550561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-023-09930-9 |
_version_ | 1785136991821627392 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yunxiao Li, Chengcheng Ouyang, Jing Xu, Gongjun |
author_facet | Chen, Yunxiao Li, Chengcheng Ouyang, Jing Xu, Gongjun |
author_sort | Chen, Yunxiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Establishing the invariance property of an instrument (e.g., a questionnaire or test) is a key step for establishing its measurement validity. Measurement invariance is typically assessed by differential item functioning (DIF) analysis, i.e., detecting DIF items whose response distribution depends not only on the latent trait measured by the instrument but also on the group membership. DIF analysis is confounded by the group difference in the latent trait distributions. Many DIF analyses require knowing several anchor items that are DIF-free in order to draw inferences on whether each of the rest is a DIF item, where the anchor items are used to identify the latent trait distributions. When no prior information on anchor items is available, or some anchor items are misspecified, item purification methods and regularized estimation methods can be used. The former iteratively purifies the anchor set by a stepwise model selection procedure, and the latter selects the DIF-free items by a LASSO-type regularization approach. Unfortunately, unlike the methods based on a correctly specified anchor set, these methods are not guaranteed to provide valid statistical inference (e.g., confidence intervals and p-values). In this paper, we propose a new method for DIF analysis under a multiple indicators and multiple causes (MIMIC) model for DIF. This method adopts a minimal [Formula: see text] norm condition for identifying the latent trait distributions. Without requiring prior knowledge about an anchor set, it can accurately estimate the DIF effects of individual items and further draw valid statistical inferences for quantifying the uncertainty. Specifically, the inference results allow us to control the type-I error for DIF detection, which may not be possible with item purification and regularized estimation methods. We conduct simulation studies to evaluate the performance of the proposed method and compare it with the anchor-set-based likelihood ratio test approach and the LASSO approach. The proposed method is applied to analysing the three personality scales of the Eysenck personality questionnaire-revised (EPQ-R). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11336-023-09930-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10656337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106563372023-08-07 DIF Statistical Inference Without Knowing Anchoring Items Chen, Yunxiao Li, Chengcheng Ouyang, Jing Xu, Gongjun Psychometrika Theory and Methods Establishing the invariance property of an instrument (e.g., a questionnaire or test) is a key step for establishing its measurement validity. Measurement invariance is typically assessed by differential item functioning (DIF) analysis, i.e., detecting DIF items whose response distribution depends not only on the latent trait measured by the instrument but also on the group membership. DIF analysis is confounded by the group difference in the latent trait distributions. Many DIF analyses require knowing several anchor items that are DIF-free in order to draw inferences on whether each of the rest is a DIF item, where the anchor items are used to identify the latent trait distributions. When no prior information on anchor items is available, or some anchor items are misspecified, item purification methods and regularized estimation methods can be used. The former iteratively purifies the anchor set by a stepwise model selection procedure, and the latter selects the DIF-free items by a LASSO-type regularization approach. Unfortunately, unlike the methods based on a correctly specified anchor set, these methods are not guaranteed to provide valid statistical inference (e.g., confidence intervals and p-values). In this paper, we propose a new method for DIF analysis under a multiple indicators and multiple causes (MIMIC) model for DIF. This method adopts a minimal [Formula: see text] norm condition for identifying the latent trait distributions. Without requiring prior knowledge about an anchor set, it can accurately estimate the DIF effects of individual items and further draw valid statistical inferences for quantifying the uncertainty. Specifically, the inference results allow us to control the type-I error for DIF detection, which may not be possible with item purification and regularized estimation methods. We conduct simulation studies to evaluate the performance of the proposed method and compare it with the anchor-set-based likelihood ratio test approach and the LASSO approach. The proposed method is applied to analysing the three personality scales of the Eysenck personality questionnaire-revised (EPQ-R). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11336-023-09930-9. Springer US 2023-08-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10656337/ /pubmed/37550561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-023-09930-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Theory and Methods Chen, Yunxiao Li, Chengcheng Ouyang, Jing Xu, Gongjun DIF Statistical Inference Without Knowing Anchoring Items |
title | DIF Statistical Inference Without Knowing Anchoring Items |
title_full | DIF Statistical Inference Without Knowing Anchoring Items |
title_fullStr | DIF Statistical Inference Without Knowing Anchoring Items |
title_full_unstemmed | DIF Statistical Inference Without Knowing Anchoring Items |
title_short | DIF Statistical Inference Without Knowing Anchoring Items |
title_sort | dif statistical inference without knowing anchoring items |
topic | Theory and Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37550561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-023-09930-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyunxiao difstatisticalinferencewithoutknowinganchoringitems AT lichengcheng difstatisticalinferencewithoutknowinganchoringitems AT ouyangjing difstatisticalinferencewithoutknowinganchoringitems AT xugongjun difstatisticalinferencewithoutknowinganchoringitems |