Cargando…
Trends in Proportion of Medicare Part D Claims Subject to 340B Discounts, 2013-2020
IMPORTANCE: Despite controversy surrounding the 340B program, no study has analyzed trends in the proportion of Medicare Part D pharmacy claims eligible for 340B discounts. OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in the proportion of Medicare Part D claims that are prescribed by 340B-affiliated clinicians and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37976048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4091 |
_version_ | 1785148063639142400 |
---|---|
author | Dickson, Sean Gabriel, Nico Hernandez, Inmaculada |
author_facet | Dickson, Sean Gabriel, Nico Hernandez, Inmaculada |
author_sort | Dickson, Sean |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Despite controversy surrounding the 340B program, no study has analyzed trends in the proportion of Medicare Part D pharmacy claims eligible for 340B discounts. OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in the proportion of Medicare Part D claims that are prescribed by 340B-affiliated clinicians and filled in 340B pharmacies. DESIGN AND SETTING: This longitudinal, retrospective cohort study included 2013 to 2020 claims data from a 5% random sample of Medicare Part D beneficiaries from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and 6292 nine-digit national drug codes that were used by at least 1000 Part D beneficiaries in a given year. Data analysis was completed from November 2022 to April 2023. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: For each drug and year, there were 3 outcomes: (1) proportion of total Part D claims that were prescribed by a 340B-affiliated clinician; (2) proportion of claims prescribed by a 340B-affiliated clinician that were filled in a 340B pharmacy; and (3) proportion of total Part D claims under the 340B program (ie, prescribed by a 340B-affiliated clinician and filled in a 340B pharmacy). RESULTS: The proportion of prescriptions written by a 340B-affiliated clinician doubled from 9.4% in 2013 to 19.3% in 2020. The capture of 340B prescriptions by 340B pharmacies, defined as the proportion of claims prescribed by 340B-affiliated clinicians that were filled by 340B pharmacies, increased from 18.4% in 2013 to 49.9% in 2020. As a result, the total proportion of 340B claims in Part D increased from 1.7% in 2013 to 9.6% in 2020. Rates of 340B prescribing and capture increased consistently across therapeutic classes. In 2020, the antiviral therapeutic class was the class with the largest proportion of 340B claims (16.1%), followed by targeted antineoplastics (15.7%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This cohort study demonstrated that from 2013 to 2020, the share of Medicare Part D claims prescribed by a 340B-affiliated clinician increased; however, the rate at which 340B-eligible prescriptions were filled at 340B pharmacies increased at a faster rate, driving the overall increase in 340B claims. Despite these trends, only half of 340B-eligible prescriptions were subject to the 340B discount in 2020. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10656642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106566422023-11-17 Trends in Proportion of Medicare Part D Claims Subject to 340B Discounts, 2013-2020 Dickson, Sean Gabriel, Nico Hernandez, Inmaculada JAMA Health Forum Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Despite controversy surrounding the 340B program, no study has analyzed trends in the proportion of Medicare Part D pharmacy claims eligible for 340B discounts. OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in the proportion of Medicare Part D claims that are prescribed by 340B-affiliated clinicians and filled in 340B pharmacies. DESIGN AND SETTING: This longitudinal, retrospective cohort study included 2013 to 2020 claims data from a 5% random sample of Medicare Part D beneficiaries from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and 6292 nine-digit national drug codes that were used by at least 1000 Part D beneficiaries in a given year. Data analysis was completed from November 2022 to April 2023. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: For each drug and year, there were 3 outcomes: (1) proportion of total Part D claims that were prescribed by a 340B-affiliated clinician; (2) proportion of claims prescribed by a 340B-affiliated clinician that were filled in a 340B pharmacy; and (3) proportion of total Part D claims under the 340B program (ie, prescribed by a 340B-affiliated clinician and filled in a 340B pharmacy). RESULTS: The proportion of prescriptions written by a 340B-affiliated clinician doubled from 9.4% in 2013 to 19.3% in 2020. The capture of 340B prescriptions by 340B pharmacies, defined as the proportion of claims prescribed by 340B-affiliated clinicians that were filled by 340B pharmacies, increased from 18.4% in 2013 to 49.9% in 2020. As a result, the total proportion of 340B claims in Part D increased from 1.7% in 2013 to 9.6% in 2020. Rates of 340B prescribing and capture increased consistently across therapeutic classes. In 2020, the antiviral therapeutic class was the class with the largest proportion of 340B claims (16.1%), followed by targeted antineoplastics (15.7%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This cohort study demonstrated that from 2013 to 2020, the share of Medicare Part D claims prescribed by a 340B-affiliated clinician increased; however, the rate at which 340B-eligible prescriptions were filled at 340B pharmacies increased at a faster rate, driving the overall increase in 340B claims. Despite these trends, only half of 340B-eligible prescriptions were subject to the 340B discount in 2020. American Medical Association 2023-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10656642/ /pubmed/37976048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4091 Text en Copyright 2023 Dickson S et al. JAMA Health Forum. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Dickson, Sean Gabriel, Nico Hernandez, Inmaculada Trends in Proportion of Medicare Part D Claims Subject to 340B Discounts, 2013-2020 |
title | Trends in Proportion of Medicare Part D Claims Subject to 340B Discounts, 2013-2020 |
title_full | Trends in Proportion of Medicare Part D Claims Subject to 340B Discounts, 2013-2020 |
title_fullStr | Trends in Proportion of Medicare Part D Claims Subject to 340B Discounts, 2013-2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | Trends in Proportion of Medicare Part D Claims Subject to 340B Discounts, 2013-2020 |
title_short | Trends in Proportion of Medicare Part D Claims Subject to 340B Discounts, 2013-2020 |
title_sort | trends in proportion of medicare part d claims subject to 340b discounts, 2013-2020 |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37976048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dicksonsean trendsinproportionofmedicarepartdclaimssubjectto340bdiscounts20132020 AT gabrielnico trendsinproportionofmedicarepartdclaimssubjectto340bdiscounts20132020 AT hernandezinmaculada trendsinproportionofmedicarepartdclaimssubjectto340bdiscounts20132020 |