Cargando…

Trends in Proportion of Medicare Part D Claims Subject to 340B Discounts, 2013-2020

IMPORTANCE: Despite controversy surrounding the 340B program, no study has analyzed trends in the proportion of Medicare Part D pharmacy claims eligible for 340B discounts. OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in the proportion of Medicare Part D claims that are prescribed by 340B-affiliated clinicians and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickson, Sean, Gabriel, Nico, Hernandez, Inmaculada
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37976048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4091
_version_ 1785148063639142400
author Dickson, Sean
Gabriel, Nico
Hernandez, Inmaculada
author_facet Dickson, Sean
Gabriel, Nico
Hernandez, Inmaculada
author_sort Dickson, Sean
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Despite controversy surrounding the 340B program, no study has analyzed trends in the proportion of Medicare Part D pharmacy claims eligible for 340B discounts. OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in the proportion of Medicare Part D claims that are prescribed by 340B-affiliated clinicians and filled in 340B pharmacies. DESIGN AND SETTING: This longitudinal, retrospective cohort study included 2013 to 2020 claims data from a 5% random sample of Medicare Part D beneficiaries from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and 6292 nine-digit national drug codes that were used by at least 1000 Part D beneficiaries in a given year. Data analysis was completed from November 2022 to April 2023. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: For each drug and year, there were 3 outcomes: (1) proportion of total Part D claims that were prescribed by a 340B-affiliated clinician; (2) proportion of claims prescribed by a 340B-affiliated clinician that were filled in a 340B pharmacy; and (3) proportion of total Part D claims under the 340B program (ie, prescribed by a 340B-affiliated clinician and filled in a 340B pharmacy). RESULTS: The proportion of prescriptions written by a 340B-affiliated clinician doubled from 9.4% in 2013 to 19.3% in 2020. The capture of 340B prescriptions by 340B pharmacies, defined as the proportion of claims prescribed by 340B-affiliated clinicians that were filled by 340B pharmacies, increased from 18.4% in 2013 to 49.9% in 2020. As a result, the total proportion of 340B claims in Part D increased from 1.7% in 2013 to 9.6% in 2020. Rates of 340B prescribing and capture increased consistently across therapeutic classes. In 2020, the antiviral therapeutic class was the class with the largest proportion of 340B claims (16.1%), followed by targeted antineoplastics (15.7%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This cohort study demonstrated that from 2013 to 2020, the share of Medicare Part D claims prescribed by a 340B-affiliated clinician increased; however, the rate at which 340B-eligible prescriptions were filled at 340B pharmacies increased at a faster rate, driving the overall increase in 340B claims. Despite these trends, only half of 340B-eligible prescriptions were subject to the 340B discount in 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10656642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106566422023-11-17 Trends in Proportion of Medicare Part D Claims Subject to 340B Discounts, 2013-2020 Dickson, Sean Gabriel, Nico Hernandez, Inmaculada JAMA Health Forum Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Despite controversy surrounding the 340B program, no study has analyzed trends in the proportion of Medicare Part D pharmacy claims eligible for 340B discounts. OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in the proportion of Medicare Part D claims that are prescribed by 340B-affiliated clinicians and filled in 340B pharmacies. DESIGN AND SETTING: This longitudinal, retrospective cohort study included 2013 to 2020 claims data from a 5% random sample of Medicare Part D beneficiaries from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and 6292 nine-digit national drug codes that were used by at least 1000 Part D beneficiaries in a given year. Data analysis was completed from November 2022 to April 2023. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: For each drug and year, there were 3 outcomes: (1) proportion of total Part D claims that were prescribed by a 340B-affiliated clinician; (2) proportion of claims prescribed by a 340B-affiliated clinician that were filled in a 340B pharmacy; and (3) proportion of total Part D claims under the 340B program (ie, prescribed by a 340B-affiliated clinician and filled in a 340B pharmacy). RESULTS: The proportion of prescriptions written by a 340B-affiliated clinician doubled from 9.4% in 2013 to 19.3% in 2020. The capture of 340B prescriptions by 340B pharmacies, defined as the proportion of claims prescribed by 340B-affiliated clinicians that were filled by 340B pharmacies, increased from 18.4% in 2013 to 49.9% in 2020. As a result, the total proportion of 340B claims in Part D increased from 1.7% in 2013 to 9.6% in 2020. Rates of 340B prescribing and capture increased consistently across therapeutic classes. In 2020, the antiviral therapeutic class was the class with the largest proportion of 340B claims (16.1%), followed by targeted antineoplastics (15.7%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This cohort study demonstrated that from 2013 to 2020, the share of Medicare Part D claims prescribed by a 340B-affiliated clinician increased; however, the rate at which 340B-eligible prescriptions were filled at 340B pharmacies increased at a faster rate, driving the overall increase in 340B claims. Despite these trends, only half of 340B-eligible prescriptions were subject to the 340B discount in 2020. American Medical Association 2023-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10656642/ /pubmed/37976048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4091 Text en Copyright 2023 Dickson S et al. JAMA Health Forum. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Dickson, Sean
Gabriel, Nico
Hernandez, Inmaculada
Trends in Proportion of Medicare Part D Claims Subject to 340B Discounts, 2013-2020
title Trends in Proportion of Medicare Part D Claims Subject to 340B Discounts, 2013-2020
title_full Trends in Proportion of Medicare Part D Claims Subject to 340B Discounts, 2013-2020
title_fullStr Trends in Proportion of Medicare Part D Claims Subject to 340B Discounts, 2013-2020
title_full_unstemmed Trends in Proportion of Medicare Part D Claims Subject to 340B Discounts, 2013-2020
title_short Trends in Proportion of Medicare Part D Claims Subject to 340B Discounts, 2013-2020
title_sort trends in proportion of medicare part d claims subject to 340b discounts, 2013-2020
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37976048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4091
work_keys_str_mv AT dicksonsean trendsinproportionofmedicarepartdclaimssubjectto340bdiscounts20132020
AT gabrielnico trendsinproportionofmedicarepartdclaimssubjectto340bdiscounts20132020
AT hernandezinmaculada trendsinproportionofmedicarepartdclaimssubjectto340bdiscounts20132020