Cargando…

Clinical Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection: A Retrospective Analysis from a Hospital in China

BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a new cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination that received clinical approval in China in 2019. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI in the treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) infection in a hospital, and differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Jia, Luo, Chengjia, Huang, Liang, Xiao, Xi, Liu, Ling, Yang, Zhiling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023408
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S435882
_version_ 1785148086428893184
author Xu, Jia
Luo, Chengjia
Huang, Liang
Xiao, Xi
Liu, Ling
Yang, Zhiling
author_facet Xu, Jia
Luo, Chengjia
Huang, Liang
Xiao, Xi
Liu, Ling
Yang, Zhiling
author_sort Xu, Jia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a new cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination that received clinical approval in China in 2019. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI in the treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) infection in a hospital, and differences in efficacy among various infection sites and between monotherapy and combination therapy, providing valuable insights for its further application. METHODS: Patients who used CAZ-AVI between January 2019 and April 2023 were identified through the hospital information system. Demographic information, details of the infection site, KP strain’s drug sensitivity report, treatment duration, combination therapies, adverse drug reactions (ADR), and 28-day survival were recorded. Clinical and microbiological efficacies were analyzed using SPSS 23.0 software to compare different infection sites and combination therapies. RESULTS: The overall effective clinical response (CR) rate of CAZ-AVI against KP infection was 62.13%, with a favorable microbial response (MR) rate was 65.68% and a 28-day survival rate was 63.91%. No significant difference occurred in effective CR and 28-day survival rate among different infection sites (P = 0.709 and 0.862, respectively). The favorable MR rate for abdominal infections was slightly lower than that for other sites of infection (P = 0.021). No significant differences in effective CR, favorable MR, and 28-day survival between monotherapy and combination therapy were present (P values were 0.649, 0.123, and 0.280, respectively). The incidence of ADR was 1.78%, including increased creatinine, elevated transaminase, hematuria, and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: CAZ-AVI demonstrates good clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of KP infections. The clinical efficacy of CAZ-AVI was similar across different infection sites, and combination therapy did not show an advantage over monotherapy. Further studies are warranted. It should be noted that CAZ-AVI may induce thrombocytopenia and hematuria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10656859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106568592023-11-14 Clinical Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection: A Retrospective Analysis from a Hospital in China Xu, Jia Luo, Chengjia Huang, Liang Xiao, Xi Liu, Ling Yang, Zhiling Infect Drug Resist Original Research BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a new cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination that received clinical approval in China in 2019. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI in the treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) infection in a hospital, and differences in efficacy among various infection sites and between monotherapy and combination therapy, providing valuable insights for its further application. METHODS: Patients who used CAZ-AVI between January 2019 and April 2023 were identified through the hospital information system. Demographic information, details of the infection site, KP strain’s drug sensitivity report, treatment duration, combination therapies, adverse drug reactions (ADR), and 28-day survival were recorded. Clinical and microbiological efficacies were analyzed using SPSS 23.0 software to compare different infection sites and combination therapies. RESULTS: The overall effective clinical response (CR) rate of CAZ-AVI against KP infection was 62.13%, with a favorable microbial response (MR) rate was 65.68% and a 28-day survival rate was 63.91%. No significant difference occurred in effective CR and 28-day survival rate among different infection sites (P = 0.709 and 0.862, respectively). The favorable MR rate for abdominal infections was slightly lower than that for other sites of infection (P = 0.021). No significant differences in effective CR, favorable MR, and 28-day survival between monotherapy and combination therapy were present (P values were 0.649, 0.123, and 0.280, respectively). The incidence of ADR was 1.78%, including increased creatinine, elevated transaminase, hematuria, and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: CAZ-AVI demonstrates good clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of KP infections. The clinical efficacy of CAZ-AVI was similar across different infection sites, and combination therapy did not show an advantage over monotherapy. Further studies are warranted. It should be noted that CAZ-AVI may induce thrombocytopenia and hematuria. Dove 2023-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10656859/ /pubmed/38023408 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S435882 Text en © 2023 Xu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Xu, Jia
Luo, Chengjia
Huang, Liang
Xiao, Xi
Liu, Ling
Yang, Zhiling
Clinical Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection: A Retrospective Analysis from a Hospital in China
title Clinical Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection: A Retrospective Analysis from a Hospital in China
title_full Clinical Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection: A Retrospective Analysis from a Hospital in China
title_fullStr Clinical Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection: A Retrospective Analysis from a Hospital in China
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection: A Retrospective Analysis from a Hospital in China
title_short Clinical Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection: A Retrospective Analysis from a Hospital in China
title_sort clinical efficacy and safety evaluation of ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of klebsiella pneumoniae infection: a retrospective analysis from a hospital in china
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023408
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S435882
work_keys_str_mv AT xujia clinicalefficacyandsafetyevaluationofceftazidimeavibactaminthetreatmentofklebsiellapneumoniaeinfectionaretrospectiveanalysisfromahospitalinchina
AT luochengjia clinicalefficacyandsafetyevaluationofceftazidimeavibactaminthetreatmentofklebsiellapneumoniaeinfectionaretrospectiveanalysisfromahospitalinchina
AT huangliang clinicalefficacyandsafetyevaluationofceftazidimeavibactaminthetreatmentofklebsiellapneumoniaeinfectionaretrospectiveanalysisfromahospitalinchina
AT xiaoxi clinicalefficacyandsafetyevaluationofceftazidimeavibactaminthetreatmentofklebsiellapneumoniaeinfectionaretrospectiveanalysisfromahospitalinchina
AT liuling clinicalefficacyandsafetyevaluationofceftazidimeavibactaminthetreatmentofklebsiellapneumoniaeinfectionaretrospectiveanalysisfromahospitalinchina
AT yangzhiling clinicalefficacyandsafetyevaluationofceftazidimeavibactaminthetreatmentofklebsiellapneumoniaeinfectionaretrospectiveanalysisfromahospitalinchina