Cargando…

Partnering with social service staff to implement pragmatic clinical trials: an interim analysis of implementation strategies

BACKGROUND: With recent growth in the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials, the reliance on frontline staff to contribute to trial-related activities has grown as well. Active partnerships with staff members are often critical to pragmatic trial implementation, but rarely do research teams track and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juckett, Lisa A., Bernard, Kimberly P., Thomas, Kali S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37978528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07757-4
_version_ 1785148102149144576
author Juckett, Lisa A.
Bernard, Kimberly P.
Thomas, Kali S.
author_facet Juckett, Lisa A.
Bernard, Kimberly P.
Thomas, Kali S.
author_sort Juckett, Lisa A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With recent growth in the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials, the reliance on frontline staff to contribute to trial-related activities has grown as well. Active partnerships with staff members are often critical to pragmatic trial implementation, but rarely do research teams track and evaluate the specific “implementation strategies” used to support staff’s involvement in trial procedures (e.g., participant recruitment). Accordingly, we adapted implementation science methodologies and conducted an interim analysis of the strategies deployed with social service staff involved in one multi-site pragmatic clinical trial. METHODS: We used a naturalistic, observational study design to characterize strategies our research team deployed with staff during monthly, virtual meetings. Data were drawn from meeting notes and recordings from the trial’s 4-month Preparation phase and 8-month Implementation phase. Strategies were mapped to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy and categorized into nine implementation clusters. Survey data were also collected from staff to identify the most useful strategies the research team should deploy when onboarding new staff members in the trial’s second year. RESULTS: A total of 287 strategies were deployed. Strategies in the develop stakeholder interrelationships cluster predominated in both the Preparation (35%) and Implementation (31%) phases, followed by strategies in the use iterative and evaluative approaches cluster, though these were more prevalent during trial Preparation (24%) as compared to trial Implementation (18%). When surveyed on strategy usefulness, strategies in the provide interactive assistance, use financial approaches, and support staff clusters were most useful, per staff responses. CONCLUSIONS: While strategies to develop stakeholder interrelationships were used most frequently during trial Preparation and Implementation, program staff perceived strategies that provided technical assistance, supported clinicians, and used financial approaches to be most useful and should be deployed when onboarding new staff members. Research teams are encouraged to adapt and apply implementation strategy tracking methods when partnering with social service staff and deploy practical strategies that support pragmatic trial success given staff needs and preferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05357261. May 2, 2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07757-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10656935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106569352023-11-17 Partnering with social service staff to implement pragmatic clinical trials: an interim analysis of implementation strategies Juckett, Lisa A. Bernard, Kimberly P. Thomas, Kali S. Trials Research BACKGROUND: With recent growth in the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials, the reliance on frontline staff to contribute to trial-related activities has grown as well. Active partnerships with staff members are often critical to pragmatic trial implementation, but rarely do research teams track and evaluate the specific “implementation strategies” used to support staff’s involvement in trial procedures (e.g., participant recruitment). Accordingly, we adapted implementation science methodologies and conducted an interim analysis of the strategies deployed with social service staff involved in one multi-site pragmatic clinical trial. METHODS: We used a naturalistic, observational study design to characterize strategies our research team deployed with staff during monthly, virtual meetings. Data were drawn from meeting notes and recordings from the trial’s 4-month Preparation phase and 8-month Implementation phase. Strategies were mapped to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy and categorized into nine implementation clusters. Survey data were also collected from staff to identify the most useful strategies the research team should deploy when onboarding new staff members in the trial’s second year. RESULTS: A total of 287 strategies were deployed. Strategies in the develop stakeholder interrelationships cluster predominated in both the Preparation (35%) and Implementation (31%) phases, followed by strategies in the use iterative and evaluative approaches cluster, though these were more prevalent during trial Preparation (24%) as compared to trial Implementation (18%). When surveyed on strategy usefulness, strategies in the provide interactive assistance, use financial approaches, and support staff clusters were most useful, per staff responses. CONCLUSIONS: While strategies to develop stakeholder interrelationships were used most frequently during trial Preparation and Implementation, program staff perceived strategies that provided technical assistance, supported clinicians, and used financial approaches to be most useful and should be deployed when onboarding new staff members. Research teams are encouraged to adapt and apply implementation strategy tracking methods when partnering with social service staff and deploy practical strategies that support pragmatic trial success given staff needs and preferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05357261. May 2, 2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07757-4. BioMed Central 2023-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10656935/ /pubmed/37978528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07757-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Juckett, Lisa A.
Bernard, Kimberly P.
Thomas, Kali S.
Partnering with social service staff to implement pragmatic clinical trials: an interim analysis of implementation strategies
title Partnering with social service staff to implement pragmatic clinical trials: an interim analysis of implementation strategies
title_full Partnering with social service staff to implement pragmatic clinical trials: an interim analysis of implementation strategies
title_fullStr Partnering with social service staff to implement pragmatic clinical trials: an interim analysis of implementation strategies
title_full_unstemmed Partnering with social service staff to implement pragmatic clinical trials: an interim analysis of implementation strategies
title_short Partnering with social service staff to implement pragmatic clinical trials: an interim analysis of implementation strategies
title_sort partnering with social service staff to implement pragmatic clinical trials: an interim analysis of implementation strategies
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37978528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07757-4
work_keys_str_mv AT juckettlisaa partneringwithsocialservicestafftoimplementpragmaticclinicaltrialsaninterimanalysisofimplementationstrategies
AT bernardkimberlyp partneringwithsocialservicestafftoimplementpragmaticclinicaltrialsaninterimanalysisofimplementationstrategies
AT thomaskalis partneringwithsocialservicestafftoimplementpragmaticclinicaltrialsaninterimanalysisofimplementationstrategies