Cargando…

Surgical treatment options for articular cartilage defects of the glenohumeral joint: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Many joint-preserving surgical interventions for cartilage defects of the knee have been adapted for use in the shoulder; however, there still exists no clear consensus for treatment. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the outcomes of different interventions in p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dagher, Danielle, Selznick, Asher, Prada, Carlos, Al Shehab, Yasser, Leroux, Timothy, Khan, Moin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38028932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17585732221142610
_version_ 1785137115874459648
author Dagher, Danielle
Selznick, Asher
Prada, Carlos
Al Shehab, Yasser
Leroux, Timothy
Khan, Moin
author_facet Dagher, Danielle
Selznick, Asher
Prada, Carlos
Al Shehab, Yasser
Leroux, Timothy
Khan, Moin
author_sort Dagher, Danielle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many joint-preserving surgical interventions for cartilage defects of the knee have been adapted for use in the shoulder; however, there still exists no clear consensus for treatment. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the outcomes of different interventions in patients with focal chondral lesions of the glenohumeral joint. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Medline. Patients who underwent a joint-preserving surgical procedure to treat a focal chondral defect of the glenoid, humeral head or both were included. Patients treated for diffuse cartilage defects or with shoulder arthroplasty were excluded. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, with follow-up data available for 194 shoulders. Eight joint-preserving procedures were evaluated, with microfracture being the most common. One study evaluating microfracture reported significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes at short-term and long-term follow-up compared to preoperative scores. Across all studies, 32 patients underwent subsequent shoulder surgery, with 22 being arthroplasties. CONCLUSIONS: We found improvements in patient-reported and functional outcomes across all studies. Although joint-preserving procedures have shown reasonable outcomes for focal chondral defects of the glenohumeral joint, long-term outcomes remain unknown, and the progression of osteoarthritis remains a concern. Higher quality evidence is required to make definitive recommendations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10656978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106569782022-12-14 Surgical treatment options for articular cartilage defects of the glenohumeral joint: A systematic review Dagher, Danielle Selznick, Asher Prada, Carlos Al Shehab, Yasser Leroux, Timothy Khan, Moin Shoulder Elbow Shoulder BACKGROUND: Many joint-preserving surgical interventions for cartilage defects of the knee have been adapted for use in the shoulder; however, there still exists no clear consensus for treatment. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the outcomes of different interventions in patients with focal chondral lesions of the glenohumeral joint. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Medline. Patients who underwent a joint-preserving surgical procedure to treat a focal chondral defect of the glenoid, humeral head or both were included. Patients treated for diffuse cartilage defects or with shoulder arthroplasty were excluded. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, with follow-up data available for 194 shoulders. Eight joint-preserving procedures were evaluated, with microfracture being the most common. One study evaluating microfracture reported significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes at short-term and long-term follow-up compared to preoperative scores. Across all studies, 32 patients underwent subsequent shoulder surgery, with 22 being arthroplasties. CONCLUSIONS: We found improvements in patient-reported and functional outcomes across all studies. Although joint-preserving procedures have shown reasonable outcomes for focal chondral defects of the glenohumeral joint, long-term outcomes remain unknown, and the progression of osteoarthritis remains a concern. Higher quality evidence is required to make definitive recommendations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV SAGE Publications 2022-12-14 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10656978/ /pubmed/38028932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17585732221142610 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Dagher, Danielle
Selznick, Asher
Prada, Carlos
Al Shehab, Yasser
Leroux, Timothy
Khan, Moin
Surgical treatment options for articular cartilage defects of the glenohumeral joint: A systematic review
title Surgical treatment options for articular cartilage defects of the glenohumeral joint: A systematic review
title_full Surgical treatment options for articular cartilage defects of the glenohumeral joint: A systematic review
title_fullStr Surgical treatment options for articular cartilage defects of the glenohumeral joint: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Surgical treatment options for articular cartilage defects of the glenohumeral joint: A systematic review
title_short Surgical treatment options for articular cartilage defects of the glenohumeral joint: A systematic review
title_sort surgical treatment options for articular cartilage defects of the glenohumeral joint: a systematic review
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38028932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17585732221142610
work_keys_str_mv AT dagherdanielle surgicaltreatmentoptionsforarticularcartilagedefectsoftheglenohumeraljointasystematicreview
AT selznickasher surgicaltreatmentoptionsforarticularcartilagedefectsoftheglenohumeraljointasystematicreview
AT pradacarlos surgicaltreatmentoptionsforarticularcartilagedefectsoftheglenohumeraljointasystematicreview
AT alshehabyasser surgicaltreatmentoptionsforarticularcartilagedefectsoftheglenohumeraljointasystematicreview
AT lerouxtimothy surgicaltreatmentoptionsforarticularcartilagedefectsoftheglenohumeraljointasystematicreview
AT khanmoin surgicaltreatmentoptionsforarticularcartilagedefectsoftheglenohumeraljointasystematicreview