Cargando…

Flat panel CT versus multidetector CT in skull base imaging: are there differences in image quality?

BACKGROUND: Purpose of this study was to compare image quality of the skull base in standard 20s protocol flat panel computed tomography (FPCT) with the new time and dose improved 10s protocol as well as with 128 slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). METHODS: 10 whole skull preparations we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schulze, Maximilian, Hirt, Bernhard, Reimann, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37980498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-023-00391-0
_version_ 1785148110979203072
author Schulze, Maximilian
Hirt, Bernhard
Reimann, Katrin
author_facet Schulze, Maximilian
Hirt, Bernhard
Reimann, Katrin
author_sort Schulze, Maximilian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Purpose of this study was to compare image quality of the skull base in standard 20s protocol flat panel computed tomography (FPCT) with the new time and dose improved 10s protocol as well as with 128 slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). METHODS: 10 whole skull preparations were scanned with either 128 slice MDCT(SOMATOM Definition AS+, Siemens, Erlangen) or FPCT (AXIOM-Artis, Siemens, Erlangen) using 10s or 20s protocol. RESULTS: FPCT provides significantly better image quality and improved delimitation of clinically relevant structures in the anterior, temporal and posterior skull base compared to 128 slice MDCT. The 20s FPCT protocol yielded best delimitability of evaluated skull base structures. However, the shorter, dose saving 10s FPCT protocol was still significantly superior to 128 slice MDCT regarding delimitability of skull base structures and additionally showed no significant inferiority compared with the 20s FPCT protocol. CONCLUSIONS: The 10s FPCT protocol yields a significantly better image quality at a comparable radiation dose exposure in imaging skull base structures compared to MDCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 371/2017BO2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10656997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106569972023-11-18 Flat panel CT versus multidetector CT in skull base imaging: are there differences in image quality? Schulze, Maximilian Hirt, Bernhard Reimann, Katrin Head Face Med Research BACKGROUND: Purpose of this study was to compare image quality of the skull base in standard 20s protocol flat panel computed tomography (FPCT) with the new time and dose improved 10s protocol as well as with 128 slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). METHODS: 10 whole skull preparations were scanned with either 128 slice MDCT(SOMATOM Definition AS+, Siemens, Erlangen) or FPCT (AXIOM-Artis, Siemens, Erlangen) using 10s or 20s protocol. RESULTS: FPCT provides significantly better image quality and improved delimitation of clinically relevant structures in the anterior, temporal and posterior skull base compared to 128 slice MDCT. The 20s FPCT protocol yielded best delimitability of evaluated skull base structures. However, the shorter, dose saving 10s FPCT protocol was still significantly superior to 128 slice MDCT regarding delimitability of skull base structures and additionally showed no significant inferiority compared with the 20s FPCT protocol. CONCLUSIONS: The 10s FPCT protocol yields a significantly better image quality at a comparable radiation dose exposure in imaging skull base structures compared to MDCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 371/2017BO2. BioMed Central 2023-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10656997/ /pubmed/37980498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-023-00391-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Schulze, Maximilian
Hirt, Bernhard
Reimann, Katrin
Flat panel CT versus multidetector CT in skull base imaging: are there differences in image quality?
title Flat panel CT versus multidetector CT in skull base imaging: are there differences in image quality?
title_full Flat panel CT versus multidetector CT in skull base imaging: are there differences in image quality?
title_fullStr Flat panel CT versus multidetector CT in skull base imaging: are there differences in image quality?
title_full_unstemmed Flat panel CT versus multidetector CT in skull base imaging: are there differences in image quality?
title_short Flat panel CT versus multidetector CT in skull base imaging: are there differences in image quality?
title_sort flat panel ct versus multidetector ct in skull base imaging: are there differences in image quality?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10656997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37980498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-023-00391-0
work_keys_str_mv AT schulzemaximilian flatpanelctversusmultidetectorctinskullbaseimagingaretheredifferencesinimagequality
AT hirtbernhard flatpanelctversusmultidetectorctinskullbaseimagingaretheredifferencesinimagequality
AT reimannkatrin flatpanelctversusmultidetectorctinskullbaseimagingaretheredifferencesinimagequality