Cargando…

Vibrotactile feedback as a countermeasure for spatial disorientation

Spaceflight can make astronauts susceptible to spatial disorientation which is one of the leading causes of fatal aircraft accidents. In our experiment, blindfolded participants used a joystick to balance themselves while inside a multi-axis rotation device (MARS) in either the vertical or horizonta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vimal, Vivekanand Pandey, Panic, Alexander Sacha, Lackner, James R., DiZio, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38028769
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1249962
_version_ 1785137151706398720
author Vimal, Vivekanand Pandey
Panic, Alexander Sacha
Lackner, James R.
DiZio, Paul
author_facet Vimal, Vivekanand Pandey
Panic, Alexander Sacha
Lackner, James R.
DiZio, Paul
author_sort Vimal, Vivekanand Pandey
collection PubMed
description Spaceflight can make astronauts susceptible to spatial disorientation which is one of the leading causes of fatal aircraft accidents. In our experiment, blindfolded participants used a joystick to balance themselves while inside a multi-axis rotation device (MARS) in either the vertical or horizontal roll plane. On Day 1, in the vertical roll plane (Earth analog condition) participants could use gravitational cues and therefore had a good sense of their orientation. On Day 2, in the horizontal roll plane (spaceflight analog condition) participants could not use gravitational cues and rapidly became disoriented and showed minimal learning and poor performance. One potential countermeasure for spatial disorientation is vibrotactile feedback that conveys body orientation provided by small vibrating devices applied to the skin. Orientation-dependent vibrotactile feedback provided to one group enhanced performance in the spaceflight condition but the participants reported a conflict between the accurate vibrotactile cues and their erroneous perception of their orientation. Specialized vibrotactile training on Day 1 provided to another group resulted in significantly better learning and performance in the spaceflight analog task with vibrotactile cueing. In this training, participants in the Earth analog condition on Day 1 were required to disengage from the task of aligning with the gravitational vertical encoded by natural vestibular/somatosensory afference and had to align with randomized non-vertical directions of balance signaled by vibrotactile feedback. At the end of Day 2, we deactivated the vibrotactile feedback after both vibration-cued groups had practiced with it in the spaceflight analog condition. They performed as well as the group who did not have any vibrotactile feedback. We conclude that after appropriate training, vibrotactile orientation feedback augments dynamic spatial orientation and does not lead to any negative dependence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10657135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106571352023-11-03 Vibrotactile feedback as a countermeasure for spatial disorientation Vimal, Vivekanand Pandey Panic, Alexander Sacha Lackner, James R. DiZio, Paul Front Physiol Physiology Spaceflight can make astronauts susceptible to spatial disorientation which is one of the leading causes of fatal aircraft accidents. In our experiment, blindfolded participants used a joystick to balance themselves while inside a multi-axis rotation device (MARS) in either the vertical or horizontal roll plane. On Day 1, in the vertical roll plane (Earth analog condition) participants could use gravitational cues and therefore had a good sense of their orientation. On Day 2, in the horizontal roll plane (spaceflight analog condition) participants could not use gravitational cues and rapidly became disoriented and showed minimal learning and poor performance. One potential countermeasure for spatial disorientation is vibrotactile feedback that conveys body orientation provided by small vibrating devices applied to the skin. Orientation-dependent vibrotactile feedback provided to one group enhanced performance in the spaceflight condition but the participants reported a conflict between the accurate vibrotactile cues and their erroneous perception of their orientation. Specialized vibrotactile training on Day 1 provided to another group resulted in significantly better learning and performance in the spaceflight analog task with vibrotactile cueing. In this training, participants in the Earth analog condition on Day 1 were required to disengage from the task of aligning with the gravitational vertical encoded by natural vestibular/somatosensory afference and had to align with randomized non-vertical directions of balance signaled by vibrotactile feedback. At the end of Day 2, we deactivated the vibrotactile feedback after both vibration-cued groups had practiced with it in the spaceflight analog condition. They performed as well as the group who did not have any vibrotactile feedback. We conclude that after appropriate training, vibrotactile orientation feedback augments dynamic spatial orientation and does not lead to any negative dependence. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10657135/ /pubmed/38028769 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1249962 Text en Copyright © 2023 Vimal, Panic, Lackner and DiZio. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Vimal, Vivekanand Pandey
Panic, Alexander Sacha
Lackner, James R.
DiZio, Paul
Vibrotactile feedback as a countermeasure for spatial disorientation
title Vibrotactile feedback as a countermeasure for spatial disorientation
title_full Vibrotactile feedback as a countermeasure for spatial disorientation
title_fullStr Vibrotactile feedback as a countermeasure for spatial disorientation
title_full_unstemmed Vibrotactile feedback as a countermeasure for spatial disorientation
title_short Vibrotactile feedback as a countermeasure for spatial disorientation
title_sort vibrotactile feedback as a countermeasure for spatial disorientation
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38028769
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1249962
work_keys_str_mv AT vimalvivekanandpandey vibrotactilefeedbackasacountermeasureforspatialdisorientation
AT panicalexandersacha vibrotactilefeedbackasacountermeasureforspatialdisorientation
AT lacknerjamesr vibrotactilefeedbackasacountermeasureforspatialdisorientation
AT diziopaul vibrotactilefeedbackasacountermeasureforspatialdisorientation