Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in assessing cervical lymph node status in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Accurate preoperative prediction of lymph node (LN) status plays a pivotal role in determining the extension of neck dissection (ND) required for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Struckmeier, Ann-Kristin, Yekta, Ebrahim, Agaimy, Abbas, Kopp, Markus, Buchbender, Mayte, Moest, Tobias, Lutz, Rainer, Kesting, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37875746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05470-y
_version_ 1785137187204890624
author Struckmeier, Ann-Kristin
Yekta, Ebrahim
Agaimy, Abbas
Kopp, Markus
Buchbender, Mayte
Moest, Tobias
Lutz, Rainer
Kesting, Marco
author_facet Struckmeier, Ann-Kristin
Yekta, Ebrahim
Agaimy, Abbas
Kopp, Markus
Buchbender, Mayte
Moest, Tobias
Lutz, Rainer
Kesting, Marco
author_sort Struckmeier, Ann-Kristin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Accurate preoperative prediction of lymph node (LN) status plays a pivotal role in determining the extension of neck dissection (ND) required for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in detecting LN metastases (LNMs) and to explore clinicopathological factors associated with its reliability. METHODS: Data from 239 patients with primary OSCC who underwent preoperative CT and subsequent radical surgery involving ND were retrospectively reviewed. Suspicious LNs were categorized into three groups: accentuated (< 10 mm), enlarged (≥ 10 mm), and melted. Statistical analysis encompassing correlation and comparative analysis, and determination of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were performed. RESULTS: Overall, sensitivity was significantly higher in the accentuated LNs group (83.54%) compared to the melted LNs group (39.24%, p < 0.05, t test). Conversely, specificity was significantly higher in the melted LNs group (98.19%) compared to the accentuated LNs group (55.15%, p < 0.05, t test). Accentuated LNs exhibited a false negative rate of 13.00%. False positive rates were 51.80%, 30.26% and 8.82%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy for detecting LNMs in level IIa and IIb exceeded that of level III. Patients with solely accentuated LNs were more likely to have a small, well-differentiated tumor. However, no distinctions emerged in terms of the occurrence of T4 tumors among the three groups. CONCLUSION: CT proves sufficient to predict LNMs in patients with OSCC. Looking ahead, the potential integration of artificial intelligence and deep learning holds promise to further enhance the reliability of CT in LNMs detection. However, this prospect necessitates further investigation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-023-05470-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10657302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106573022023-10-25 Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in assessing cervical lymph node status in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma Struckmeier, Ann-Kristin Yekta, Ebrahim Agaimy, Abbas Kopp, Markus Buchbender, Mayte Moest, Tobias Lutz, Rainer Kesting, Marco J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Research OBJECTIVE: Accurate preoperative prediction of lymph node (LN) status plays a pivotal role in determining the extension of neck dissection (ND) required for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in detecting LN metastases (LNMs) and to explore clinicopathological factors associated with its reliability. METHODS: Data from 239 patients with primary OSCC who underwent preoperative CT and subsequent radical surgery involving ND were retrospectively reviewed. Suspicious LNs were categorized into three groups: accentuated (< 10 mm), enlarged (≥ 10 mm), and melted. Statistical analysis encompassing correlation and comparative analysis, and determination of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were performed. RESULTS: Overall, sensitivity was significantly higher in the accentuated LNs group (83.54%) compared to the melted LNs group (39.24%, p < 0.05, t test). Conversely, specificity was significantly higher in the melted LNs group (98.19%) compared to the accentuated LNs group (55.15%, p < 0.05, t test). Accentuated LNs exhibited a false negative rate of 13.00%. False positive rates were 51.80%, 30.26% and 8.82%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy for detecting LNMs in level IIa and IIb exceeded that of level III. Patients with solely accentuated LNs were more likely to have a small, well-differentiated tumor. However, no distinctions emerged in terms of the occurrence of T4 tumors among the three groups. CONCLUSION: CT proves sufficient to predict LNMs in patients with OSCC. Looking ahead, the potential integration of artificial intelligence and deep learning holds promise to further enhance the reliability of CT in LNMs detection. However, this prospect necessitates further investigation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-023-05470-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-10-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10657302/ /pubmed/37875746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05470-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Struckmeier, Ann-Kristin
Yekta, Ebrahim
Agaimy, Abbas
Kopp, Markus
Buchbender, Mayte
Moest, Tobias
Lutz, Rainer
Kesting, Marco
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in assessing cervical lymph node status in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
title Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in assessing cervical lymph node status in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in assessing cervical lymph node status in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in assessing cervical lymph node status in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in assessing cervical lymph node status in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in assessing cervical lymph node status in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in assessing cervical lymph node status in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37875746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05470-y
work_keys_str_mv AT struckmeierannkristin diagnosticaccuracyofcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyinassessingcervicallymphnodestatusinpatientswithoralsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT yektaebrahim diagnosticaccuracyofcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyinassessingcervicallymphnodestatusinpatientswithoralsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT agaimyabbas diagnosticaccuracyofcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyinassessingcervicallymphnodestatusinpatientswithoralsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT koppmarkus diagnosticaccuracyofcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyinassessingcervicallymphnodestatusinpatientswithoralsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT buchbendermayte diagnosticaccuracyofcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyinassessingcervicallymphnodestatusinpatientswithoralsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT moesttobias diagnosticaccuracyofcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyinassessingcervicallymphnodestatusinpatientswithoralsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT lutzrainer diagnosticaccuracyofcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyinassessingcervicallymphnodestatusinpatientswithoralsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT kestingmarco diagnosticaccuracyofcontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyinassessingcervicallymphnodestatusinpatientswithoralsquamouscellcarcinoma