Cargando…

Family carer experiences of hospice care at home: Qualitative findings from a mixed methods realist evaluation

BACKGROUND: Hospice-at-home aims to enable patients approaching end-of-life to die at home and support their carers. A wide range of different service models exists but synthesised evidence on how best to support family carers to provide sustainable end-of-life care at home is limited. AIM: To explo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abrahamson, Vanessa, Wilson, Patricia, Barclay, Stephen, Brigden, Charlotte, Gage, Heather, Greene, Kay, Hashem, Ferhana, Mikelyte, Rasa, Rees-Roberts, Melanie, Silsbury, Graham, Goodwin, Mary, Swash, Brooke, Wee, Bee, Williams, Peter, Butler, Claire
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37864507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692163231206027
_version_ 1785148163485597696
author Abrahamson, Vanessa
Wilson, Patricia
Barclay, Stephen
Brigden, Charlotte
Gage, Heather
Greene, Kay
Hashem, Ferhana
Mikelyte, Rasa
Rees-Roberts, Melanie
Silsbury, Graham
Goodwin, Mary
Swash, Brooke
Wee, Bee
Williams, Peter
Butler, Claire
author_facet Abrahamson, Vanessa
Wilson, Patricia
Barclay, Stephen
Brigden, Charlotte
Gage, Heather
Greene, Kay
Hashem, Ferhana
Mikelyte, Rasa
Rees-Roberts, Melanie
Silsbury, Graham
Goodwin, Mary
Swash, Brooke
Wee, Bee
Williams, Peter
Butler, Claire
author_sort Abrahamson, Vanessa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospice-at-home aims to enable patients approaching end-of-life to die at home and support their carers. A wide range of different service models exists but synthesised evidence on how best to support family carers to provide sustainable end-of-life care at home is limited. AIM: To explore what works best to promote family carers’ experiences of hospice-at-home. DESIGN: Realist evaluation with mixed methods. This paper focuses on qualitative interviews with carers (to gain their perspective and as proxy for patients) and service providers from 12 case study sites in England. Interviews were coded and programme theories were refined by the research team including two public members. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Interviews with carers (involved daily) of patients admitted to hospice-at-home services (n = 58) and hospice-at-home staff (n = 78). RESULTS: Post bereavement, 76.4% of carers thought that they had received as much help and support as they needed and most carers (75.8%) rated the help and support as excellent or outstanding. Of six final programme theories capturing key factors relevant to providing optimum services, those directly relevant to carer experiences were: integration and co-ordination of services; knowledge, skills and ethos of hospice staff; volunteer roles; support directed at the patient–carer dyad. CONCLUSIONS: Carers in hospice-at-home services identified care to be of a higher quality than generic community services. Hospice staff were perceived as having ‘time to care’, communicated well and were comfortable with dying and death. Hands-on care was particularly valued in the period close to death.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10657508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106575082023-11-19 Family carer experiences of hospice care at home: Qualitative findings from a mixed methods realist evaluation Abrahamson, Vanessa Wilson, Patricia Barclay, Stephen Brigden, Charlotte Gage, Heather Greene, Kay Hashem, Ferhana Mikelyte, Rasa Rees-Roberts, Melanie Silsbury, Graham Goodwin, Mary Swash, Brooke Wee, Bee Williams, Peter Butler, Claire Palliat Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Hospice-at-home aims to enable patients approaching end-of-life to die at home and support their carers. A wide range of different service models exists but synthesised evidence on how best to support family carers to provide sustainable end-of-life care at home is limited. AIM: To explore what works best to promote family carers’ experiences of hospice-at-home. DESIGN: Realist evaluation with mixed methods. This paper focuses on qualitative interviews with carers (to gain their perspective and as proxy for patients) and service providers from 12 case study sites in England. Interviews were coded and programme theories were refined by the research team including two public members. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Interviews with carers (involved daily) of patients admitted to hospice-at-home services (n = 58) and hospice-at-home staff (n = 78). RESULTS: Post bereavement, 76.4% of carers thought that they had received as much help and support as they needed and most carers (75.8%) rated the help and support as excellent or outstanding. Of six final programme theories capturing key factors relevant to providing optimum services, those directly relevant to carer experiences were: integration and co-ordination of services; knowledge, skills and ethos of hospice staff; volunteer roles; support directed at the patient–carer dyad. CONCLUSIONS: Carers in hospice-at-home services identified care to be of a higher quality than generic community services. Hospice staff were perceived as having ‘time to care’, communicated well and were comfortable with dying and death. Hands-on care was particularly valued in the period close to death. SAGE Publications 2023-10-21 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10657508/ /pubmed/37864507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692163231206027 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Abrahamson, Vanessa
Wilson, Patricia
Barclay, Stephen
Brigden, Charlotte
Gage, Heather
Greene, Kay
Hashem, Ferhana
Mikelyte, Rasa
Rees-Roberts, Melanie
Silsbury, Graham
Goodwin, Mary
Swash, Brooke
Wee, Bee
Williams, Peter
Butler, Claire
Family carer experiences of hospice care at home: Qualitative findings from a mixed methods realist evaluation
title Family carer experiences of hospice care at home: Qualitative findings from a mixed methods realist evaluation
title_full Family carer experiences of hospice care at home: Qualitative findings from a mixed methods realist evaluation
title_fullStr Family carer experiences of hospice care at home: Qualitative findings from a mixed methods realist evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Family carer experiences of hospice care at home: Qualitative findings from a mixed methods realist evaluation
title_short Family carer experiences of hospice care at home: Qualitative findings from a mixed methods realist evaluation
title_sort family carer experiences of hospice care at home: qualitative findings from a mixed methods realist evaluation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37864507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692163231206027
work_keys_str_mv AT abrahamsonvanessa familycarerexperiencesofhospicecareathomequalitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT wilsonpatricia familycarerexperiencesofhospicecareathomequalitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT barclaystephen familycarerexperiencesofhospicecareathomequalitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT brigdencharlotte familycarerexperiencesofhospicecareathomequalitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT gageheather familycarerexperiencesofhospicecareathomequalitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT greenekay familycarerexperiencesofhospicecareathomequalitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT hashemferhana familycarerexperiencesofhospicecareathomequalitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT mikelyterasa familycarerexperiencesofhospicecareathomequalitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT reesrobertsmelanie familycarerexperiencesofhospicecareathomequalitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT silsburygraham familycarerexperiencesofhospicecareathomequalitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT goodwinmary familycarerexperiencesofhospicecareathomequalitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT swashbrooke familycarerexperiencesofhospicecareathomequalitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT weebee familycarerexperiencesofhospicecareathomequalitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT williamspeter familycarerexperiencesofhospicecareathomequalitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsrealistevaluation
AT butlerclaire familycarerexperiencesofhospicecareathomequalitativefindingsfromamixedmethodsrealistevaluation