Cargando…

A prospective randomized half-body study: 308 nm LED light vs. 308 nm excimer laser for localized psoriasis

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease affecting approximately 3.2% of the population. The 308 nm light emitting diode (LED) is a novel, portable, and cost-effective light source, may have potential in the treatment of localized psoriasis patients in a home setting. OBJECTIVE: To compare th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Yingyuan, Lu, Jiajing, Zhang, Yi, Shi, Yuling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020146
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1275912
_version_ 1785137303742578688
author Yu, Yingyuan
Lu, Jiajing
Zhang, Yi
Shi, Yuling
author_facet Yu, Yingyuan
Lu, Jiajing
Zhang, Yi
Shi, Yuling
author_sort Yu, Yingyuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease affecting approximately 3.2% of the population. The 308 nm light emitting diode (LED) is a novel, portable, and cost-effective light source, may have potential in the treatment of localized psoriasis patients in a home setting. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and dermoscopic responses in localized psoriatic patients undergoing localized phototherapy with 308 nm LED light and excimer laser. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis and symmetrical skin lesions were included in this prospective, randomized, left-to-right body trial. The target lesions were randomly treated with either LED light or excimer laser twice a week for 12 weeks. The responses were evaluated by the local psoriasis severity index (LPSI) scores, and dermoscopic features of the target lesions were examined and analyzed. RESULTS: Out of the 22 included psoriasis patients, 10 successfully completed the 12 weeks study. Both treatment sides showed similar clinical improvement in terms of clinical response, as evidenced by a LPSI 50 rate of 70% on the LED side and 80% on the excimer side, p > 0.05. Furthermore, the dermoscopic features also exhibited comparable improvement. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of 308 nm LED light therapy are comparable to 308 nm excimer laser therapy. Moreover, given the portability and cost-effectiveness of 308 nm LED light, it holds great promise as a home phototherapy in the treatment of psoriasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10657802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106578022023-11-06 A prospective randomized half-body study: 308 nm LED light vs. 308 nm excimer laser for localized psoriasis Yu, Yingyuan Lu, Jiajing Zhang, Yi Shi, Yuling Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease affecting approximately 3.2% of the population. The 308 nm light emitting diode (LED) is a novel, portable, and cost-effective light source, may have potential in the treatment of localized psoriasis patients in a home setting. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and dermoscopic responses in localized psoriatic patients undergoing localized phototherapy with 308 nm LED light and excimer laser. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis and symmetrical skin lesions were included in this prospective, randomized, left-to-right body trial. The target lesions were randomly treated with either LED light or excimer laser twice a week for 12 weeks. The responses were evaluated by the local psoriasis severity index (LPSI) scores, and dermoscopic features of the target lesions were examined and analyzed. RESULTS: Out of the 22 included psoriasis patients, 10 successfully completed the 12 weeks study. Both treatment sides showed similar clinical improvement in terms of clinical response, as evidenced by a LPSI 50 rate of 70% on the LED side and 80% on the excimer side, p > 0.05. Furthermore, the dermoscopic features also exhibited comparable improvement. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of 308 nm LED light therapy are comparable to 308 nm excimer laser therapy. Moreover, given the portability and cost-effectiveness of 308 nm LED light, it holds great promise as a home phototherapy in the treatment of psoriasis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10657802/ /pubmed/38020146 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1275912 Text en Copyright © 2023 Yu, Lu, Zhang and Shi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Yu, Yingyuan
Lu, Jiajing
Zhang, Yi
Shi, Yuling
A prospective randomized half-body study: 308 nm LED light vs. 308 nm excimer laser for localized psoriasis
title A prospective randomized half-body study: 308 nm LED light vs. 308 nm excimer laser for localized psoriasis
title_full A prospective randomized half-body study: 308 nm LED light vs. 308 nm excimer laser for localized psoriasis
title_fullStr A prospective randomized half-body study: 308 nm LED light vs. 308 nm excimer laser for localized psoriasis
title_full_unstemmed A prospective randomized half-body study: 308 nm LED light vs. 308 nm excimer laser for localized psoriasis
title_short A prospective randomized half-body study: 308 nm LED light vs. 308 nm excimer laser for localized psoriasis
title_sort prospective randomized half-body study: 308 nm led light vs. 308 nm excimer laser for localized psoriasis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020146
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1275912
work_keys_str_mv AT yuyingyuan aprospectiverandomizedhalfbodystudy308nmledlightvs308nmexcimerlaserforlocalizedpsoriasis
AT lujiajing aprospectiverandomizedhalfbodystudy308nmledlightvs308nmexcimerlaserforlocalizedpsoriasis
AT zhangyi aprospectiverandomizedhalfbodystudy308nmledlightvs308nmexcimerlaserforlocalizedpsoriasis
AT shiyuling aprospectiverandomizedhalfbodystudy308nmledlightvs308nmexcimerlaserforlocalizedpsoriasis
AT yuyingyuan prospectiverandomizedhalfbodystudy308nmledlightvs308nmexcimerlaserforlocalizedpsoriasis
AT lujiajing prospectiverandomizedhalfbodystudy308nmledlightvs308nmexcimerlaserforlocalizedpsoriasis
AT zhangyi prospectiverandomizedhalfbodystudy308nmledlightvs308nmexcimerlaserforlocalizedpsoriasis
AT shiyuling prospectiverandomizedhalfbodystudy308nmledlightvs308nmexcimerlaserforlocalizedpsoriasis