Cargando…

Risk of African swine fever virus transmission among wild boar and domestic pigs in Poland

INTRODUCTION: African swine fever (ASF) is a notifiable disease of swine that impacts global pork trade and food security. In several countries across the globe, the disease persists in wild boar (WB) populations sympatric to domestic pig (DP) operations, with continued detections in both sectors. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pepin, Kim M., Borowik, Tomasz, Frant, Maciej, Plis, Kamila, Podgórski, Tomasz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38026636
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1295127
_version_ 1785137315508649984
author Pepin, Kim M.
Borowik, Tomasz
Frant, Maciej
Plis, Kamila
Podgórski, Tomasz
author_facet Pepin, Kim M.
Borowik, Tomasz
Frant, Maciej
Plis, Kamila
Podgórski, Tomasz
author_sort Pepin, Kim M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: African swine fever (ASF) is a notifiable disease of swine that impacts global pork trade and food security. In several countries across the globe, the disease persists in wild boar (WB) populations sympatric to domestic pig (DP) operations, with continued detections in both sectors. While there is evidence of spillover and spillback between the sectors, the frequency of occurrence and relative importance of different risk factors for transmission at the wildlife-livestock interface remain unclear. METHODS: To address this gap, we leveraged ASF surveillance data from WB and DP across Eastern Poland from 2014–2019 in an analysis that quantified the relative importance of different risk factors for explaining variation in each of the ASF surveillance data from WB and DP. RESULTS: ASF prevalence exhibited different seasonal trends across the sectors: apparent prevalence was much higher in summer (84% of detections) in DP, but more consistent throughout the year in WB (highest in winter with 45%, lowest in summer at 15%). Only 21.8% of DP-positive surveillance data included surveillance in WB nearby (within 5 km of the grid cell within the last 4 weeks), while 41.9% of WB-positive surveillance samples included any DP surveillance samples nearby. Thus, the surveillance design afforded twice as much opportunity to find DP-positive samples in the recent vicinity of WB-positive samples compared to the opposite, yet the rate of positive WB samples in the recent vicinity of a positive DP sample was 48 times as likely than the rate of positive DP samples in the recent vicinity of a positive WB sample. Our machine learning analyses found that positive samples in WB were predicted by WB-related risk factors, but not to DP-related risk factors. In contrast, WB risk factors were important for predicting detections in DP on a few spatial and temporal scales of data aggregation. DISCUSSION: Our results highlight that spillover from WB to DP might be more frequent than the reverse, but that the structure of current surveillance systems challenge quantification of spillover frequency and risk factors. Our results emphasize the importance of, and provide guidance for, improving cross-sector surveillance designs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10657852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106578522023-01-01 Risk of African swine fever virus transmission among wild boar and domestic pigs in Poland Pepin, Kim M. Borowik, Tomasz Frant, Maciej Plis, Kamila Podgórski, Tomasz Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science INTRODUCTION: African swine fever (ASF) is a notifiable disease of swine that impacts global pork trade and food security. In several countries across the globe, the disease persists in wild boar (WB) populations sympatric to domestic pig (DP) operations, with continued detections in both sectors. While there is evidence of spillover and spillback between the sectors, the frequency of occurrence and relative importance of different risk factors for transmission at the wildlife-livestock interface remain unclear. METHODS: To address this gap, we leveraged ASF surveillance data from WB and DP across Eastern Poland from 2014–2019 in an analysis that quantified the relative importance of different risk factors for explaining variation in each of the ASF surveillance data from WB and DP. RESULTS: ASF prevalence exhibited different seasonal trends across the sectors: apparent prevalence was much higher in summer (84% of detections) in DP, but more consistent throughout the year in WB (highest in winter with 45%, lowest in summer at 15%). Only 21.8% of DP-positive surveillance data included surveillance in WB nearby (within 5 km of the grid cell within the last 4 weeks), while 41.9% of WB-positive surveillance samples included any DP surveillance samples nearby. Thus, the surveillance design afforded twice as much opportunity to find DP-positive samples in the recent vicinity of WB-positive samples compared to the opposite, yet the rate of positive WB samples in the recent vicinity of a positive DP sample was 48 times as likely than the rate of positive DP samples in the recent vicinity of a positive WB sample. Our machine learning analyses found that positive samples in WB were predicted by WB-related risk factors, but not to DP-related risk factors. In contrast, WB risk factors were important for predicting detections in DP on a few spatial and temporal scales of data aggregation. DISCUSSION: Our results highlight that spillover from WB to DP might be more frequent than the reverse, but that the structure of current surveillance systems challenge quantification of spillover frequency and risk factors. Our results emphasize the importance of, and provide guidance for, improving cross-sector surveillance designs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10657852/ /pubmed/38026636 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1295127 Text en Copyright © 2023 Pepin, Borowik, Frant, Plis and Podgórski. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Pepin, Kim M.
Borowik, Tomasz
Frant, Maciej
Plis, Kamila
Podgórski, Tomasz
Risk of African swine fever virus transmission among wild boar and domestic pigs in Poland
title Risk of African swine fever virus transmission among wild boar and domestic pigs in Poland
title_full Risk of African swine fever virus transmission among wild boar and domestic pigs in Poland
title_fullStr Risk of African swine fever virus transmission among wild boar and domestic pigs in Poland
title_full_unstemmed Risk of African swine fever virus transmission among wild boar and domestic pigs in Poland
title_short Risk of African swine fever virus transmission among wild boar and domestic pigs in Poland
title_sort risk of african swine fever virus transmission among wild boar and domestic pigs in poland
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38026636
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1295127
work_keys_str_mv AT pepinkimm riskofafricanswinefevervirustransmissionamongwildboaranddomesticpigsinpoland
AT borowiktomasz riskofafricanswinefevervirustransmissionamongwildboaranddomesticpigsinpoland
AT frantmaciej riskofafricanswinefevervirustransmissionamongwildboaranddomesticpigsinpoland
AT pliskamila riskofafricanswinefevervirustransmissionamongwildboaranddomesticpigsinpoland
AT podgorskitomasz riskofafricanswinefevervirustransmissionamongwildboaranddomesticpigsinpoland